Internet Radio In Danger of Extinction in United States 229
An anonymous reader passed us a link to a Forbes article discussing dire news for fans of Internet radio. Yesterday afternoon saw online broadcasters, everyone from giants like Clear Channel and National Public Radio to small-fry internet concerns, arguing their case before the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB). The CRB's March 2nd decision to increase the fees associated with online music broadcasting will have harsh repercussions for those who engage in the activity, the panel was told. "Under a previous arrangement, which expired at the end of 2005, broadcasters and online companies such as Yahoo Inc. and Time Warner Inc.'s AOL unit could pay royalties based on estimates of how many songs were played over a given period of time, or a 'tuning hour,' as opposed to counting every single song ... [They] also asked the judges to clarify a $500 annual fee per broadcasting channel, saying that with some online companies offering many thousands of listening options, counting each one as a separate channel could lead to huge fees for online broadcasters." There was also a previous provision for smaller companies that allowed them to pay less, something the March 2 decision did away with; in the view of the royalty holders, advertising more than pays for these fees, and they're ready for higher payments.
Classic Radio (Score:5, Interesting)
Outsourcing? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Well it had to happen sometime (Score:1, Interesting)
Except internet broadcasters have been paying fees. The difference is that the new rules make the fees higher for internet radio stations than for terrestrial radio stations.
Should mimic broadcast radio (Score:1, Interesting)
What's To Stop International Broadcasts? (Score:1, Interesting)
Profit? (Score:3, Interesting)
Royalties for broadcasting over public airwaves, or on the Internet are a really dumb idea. The artist already got paid with the CD sale. The artist gets 'free' advertising.
Go on tour and make your money. Use CDs as promotional material.
Re:As the adage says, if you outlaw Internet Radio (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:ditch corporate music (Score:3, Interesting)
Until music is sold without DRM in mp3/flac form for reasonable prices people will continue to download and nobody will buy cds. Unfortunatley (for them) RIAA & friends dont want to sell mp3/flacs without DRM. Therefore they are digging their own graves a little more every day.
One day even these dinosaurs will have to face reality and see that they are no longer needed in their current form and they grow less powerful everyday. Just as a meteor one day killed all the dinosaurs and made way for man, so will p2p smite the record companies and finally free the independant artist from their evil chains (please excuse the dramatism
Re:Well it had to happen sometime (Score:3, Interesting)
Potential audience size is meaningless (Score:2, Interesting)
No, else by your logic, any song played on shortwave radio would have to account for a potential audience of 6+ billion people.
Re:Denial, RIAA style-sideline story (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Outsourcing? (Score:1, Interesting)
Now, offshore business entities
Re:ditch corporate music (Score:3, Interesting)
David Byrne [nytimes.com] agrees with you -- he believes that thanks to the Internet, artists don't need the music labels as much anymore, which means if the RIAA wants to stick around, it better find a way to adapt to the times.
Annoying, yes. A problem, no. (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:This is what the US needs (Score:3, Interesting)
The thing that galls me the most is that he has absolutely no concern about America's place in the world. To him, America *is* the world. His rationale? We've got every type of climate and terrain, somebody from every country in the world, and "all the brains to last my lifetime" (his words). He has no kids so he doesn't give a flying fig about the future more than the next release of GTA.
I get the impression there are a lot of these people about.
Re:ditch corporate music (Score:3, Interesting)
What you are saying is true for bands from large music companies.
OTH, a regional band in my area named Blue October's CD's are almost like a compilation of greatest hits. Maybe it's because they are still fresh/young and have something to say. I know they love their music enough for the lead singer to come out on a broken leg to sing despite being in obvious pain.
It's tough- I was exposed to them through copies of their music ( a friend wanted me to go to a concert so burned me a CD). Then I went to the concert (k-ching) and later bought a couple T-Shirts online (k-ching, k-ching). Without piracy, I'd have never become a fan.
Actually i think you're right- they are more releasing quality only and not rushing to produce filler. So they are really in the mode you are suggesting we should be in.
It's a shame for the "one hit wonders".
I don't see any point in the huge cut RIAA takes and a trivial search reveals sites saying how with a million records sold AND a concert tour, some bands still OWE money to the industry. That's just not right. That's downright evil.
Re:It will sort itself out... (Score:3, Interesting)
I read it, and the panel that awarded the fees basically took the content industries' recommendations for the new fee structure verbatim, with only one exception (they also wanted a 25% add-on to the fee for any broadcast terminating at a mobile device). It's like two people going to a required mediator, and one party asking for $1000, and the other suggesting that they can afford $50, and the judge saying "$1000 sounds good to me!"