Take Two Files Suit Against Jack Thompson 99
Bullied writes "Take Two has tired of Jack Thompson's frivolous lawsuits and has filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida to prevent him from filing any more 'nuisance' lawsuits. 'Take Two argues that the lawsuits violate its First Amendment rights to free expression, but it also claims that the suits are so vague as to be unconstitutional. "This unconstitutional vagueness will have a chilling effect on Plaintiff as well as Plaintiff's customers," says the company. "Plaintiff's distributors likely will respond to the uncertainty and fear of penalties by withholding Plaintiff's video games from the public."' Take Two also cites the disruptive effect Thompson's suits have on its retail partners."
What took so long? (Score:5, Insightful)
Thank god (Score:2, Insightful)
He filed so many crap cases, and got away with it, it is high time the tables are turned!
-bs
Re:What took so long? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Can anyone fill in legal details? (Score:3, Insightful)
It's funny when people like him wonder why others object to being told what they should and should not consume (media, food, whateverwise). I don't think he's clued in that just because he doesn't like something doesn't mean it should be illegal.
Oh well. Dude hasn't accomplished anything with his life, why start now?
Tom
Re:Can anyone fill in legal details? (Score:4, Insightful)
Funny, I don't quite think that's accurate.
If he starts bitching about a game, I know people who will rush out to buy it.
If ever said a game is good, they would rush to put it on their "not even on a very cold day in hell" list.
Re:We can only hope (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah. I wish all the people I disagree with would shut the fuck up. It ought to be illegal to hold different views from the majority. People shouldn't be free to speak whatever they want.
The guy should be held accountable for frivolous lawsuits, but he has the right to say whatever he wants. To sue him squawking about "free speech", with the intention of "shutting him up", is way beyond hypocritical - almost lawyerish.
Re:What took so long? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What took so long? (Score:3, Insightful)
No he's not, he's thinking of his own ego. I can safely say that he doesn't represent *real* Christians.
Re:We can only hope (Score:3, Insightful)
They should just pull a Viacom though, and ask for $1,000,000,000 in compensation.
Kinda hard to do with a straight face, given that they're trying to convince a judge that his lawsuits are frivolous— the word "Chutzpah" springs to mind.
There's no hope of them getting a billion bucks out of him, even if he not only goes bankrupt but shishishorupf [google.com]. I'd settle for disbarring and a federal injunction, since they might have a hope of actually getting that. Tar and feathers would be a classic touch, but more honor than Thompson deserves.
Re:What took so long? (Score:4, Insightful)
But this jackass comes up here every few months associated with some new attempt to litigate things out of existence. I think it's our duty as citizens, particularly if we have children, to try and pass them a world with SOME degree of personal freedom. A lot has been lost in this country, and complacency and apathy will have to shoulder a large part of the blame.
When they came for the gamers, I said nothing, because I was not a gamer.
Re:Talk Show (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What took so long? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:What took so long? (Score:3, Insightful)