New Microsoft Dirty Tricks Revealed 207
Conrad Mazian writes "Robert X. Cringely has an article on the Technology Evangelist web site where he claims that Microsoft destroyed evidence in the Burst vs Microsoft case. Specifically Burst's lawyers had asked for certain emails, Microsoft claimed that they couldn't find the backup tapes the emails would be on, and while this was happening the tapes were in a vault at Microsoft — until they mysteriously disappeared. It's a fascinating story, and even names one person at Microsoft."
Not completely right... (Score:3, Funny)
names (Score:5, Funny)
Oooh! It names someone at Microsoft. I'll tell you, but you gotta keep it a secret, okay? Bill Gates. Shhhh, don't tell anyone I told you...
the irony (Score:5, Funny)
And Microsoft wants to be number one in search?
Re:How convenient (Score:1, Funny)
Far more believeable then "the dog ate my homework", no shortage of historical evidence for Microsoft crashes, the only evidence I ever saw of a dog eating someone's homework was the neighbor's daughter feeding her Home Economics mistakes to their dog.
Re:Jesus Christ! (Score:5, Funny)
The corraborating evidence comes up missing ?
Re:Jesus Christ! (Score:3, Funny)
He's mostly just in charge of the destruction of chair evidence though.
I swear I had no choice to hide the tapes! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Not completely right... (Score:4, Funny)
And the DRM wouldn't let them access the content?
You can do no wrong... (Score:1, Funny)
Sneak Peak (Score:1, Funny)
The codename for the sucessor to vista?
(I know it's offtopic but it's funny so go ahead and nuke me)
Re:How convenient (Score:5, Funny)
Well, long story short, When I would eat a peanut butter sandwich while doing my homework the dog would seem interested in my backpack that night. When I left the zipper open or worse yet, it broke fro shoving too much stuff in it, the dog went in and ate the papers I was working on while eating the peanut butter sandwich.
Re:Oh, NO! (Score:4, Funny)
"Schlemiel, Schlimazel, Hasenpfeffer Incorporated!" [wikipedia.org] ??
Of course they are. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oh, NO! (Score:3, Funny)
A fine counter-argument. I'm surprised it isn't used more often.
"Come on, Your Honor, it's not like I'm the first to EVER commit this crime!"