Court Rules GPS Tracking Legal For Law Officers 293
Via Engadget (which does a good job of explaining the case), an anonymous reader passed us a link to a GPS Tracking Systems Blog post. The site, which reports regularly on GPS-related news, has word that on-the-sly GPS tracking is legal for officers of the law. A 7th circuit court of appeals ok'd the use of a GPS device in apprehending a criminal. Though the defendant's lawyers argued on fourth amendment grounds, the judge found GPS tracking did not warrant an 'unlawful search and seizure'. The judge did warn against 'wholesale surveillance' of the population, though, so ... that's some comfort.
Re:It ok'd the WARRANTLESS use of GPS (Score:4, Funny)
Apparently, you are not aware that On*Star can give restaurant recommendations in times of dire emergency or you'd have never made your comment.
Re:It ok'd the WARRANTLESS use of GPS (Score:5, Funny)
Has such a case occurred? (Restaurant recommendation instead of calling an ambulance.) Anyway, I suppose it all makes sense. You're bleeding to death. Therefore you have anemia. Nothing a good, bloody steak can't fix.
-b.
Re:It ok'd the WARRANTLESS use of GPS (Score:4, Funny)
Note to self... (Score:3, Funny)
Gas pump courtesy (Score:1, Funny)
Re:It ok'd the WARRANTLESS use of GPS (Score:5, Funny)
Re:If I find the bug, can I keep it? (Score:1, Funny)
More importantly, if an officer shoots you, do you get to keep the bullet?
If they shoot you, and then ask for their ammunition back, that would just be cruel.
Re:It ok'd the WARRANTLESS use of GPS (Score:3, Funny)
Duh.
Re:It ok'd the WARRANTLESS use of GPS (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It ok'd the WARRANTLESS use of GPS (Score:3, Funny)