Sony Settles With FTC Over Rootkits 133
The FTC has struck a deal with Sony punishing Sony for the rootkits it included on millions of CDs in 2005. The deal is exactly like the Texas and California settlements — $150 a rootkit. The settlement isn't final yet. There will be a 30-day public consultation. American citizens who read Slashdot might want to put in their two cents. Comments will be accepted through March 1 at: FTC, Office of the Secretary, Room H-135, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580 (snail mail only). Here is the FTC page announcing the settlement.
Drawing parallels (Score:4, Insightful)
Meanwhile, RIAA wants $750 per song... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Drawing parallels (Score:3, Insightful)
Not bad (Score:2, Insightful)
The only thing I'd like to see added onto there is a clause requiring Sony to pay the legal defense fees of anyone sued by the RIAA. I can dream.
By that rationale... (Score:4, Insightful)
From TFA
Hmmm... no mention whether Vista or other Microsoft operating systems will come under fire of the same arguement.
If someone in their basement pulled the exact..... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:how does this multiply out? (Score:5, Insightful)
Wouldn't a better punishment be that Sony is made to stand up and publicize (using such mediums as MTV) the particular CDs that were infected and educate people as to how they can protect against malware. - It openly damages them to those who aren't aware about this (thereby acting as a deterant for anyone else thinking about doing somthing like this), informs the masses as to the lengths DRM goes to (generating more widespread disapproval for DRM) and helps to fight malware through educating the yoot.
Re:Save your reciept ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:By that rationale... (Score:3, Insightful)
The proposed settlement requires Sony BMG to clearly disclose limitations on consumers' use of music CDs, bars it from using collected information for marketing, prohibits it from installing software without consumer consent, and requires it to provide a reasonable means of uninstalling that software.
From the summary, I thought this was about the rootkit, not the DRM functionality it was meant to protect. Why does the settlement require things that the law already requires? If the above is just a clarification of how the law was interpreted in this case, this might really have serious implications for the current crop of DRM. iTunes' DRM limits use to Apple products, PCP limits content playback to licensed hardware, Vista (probably) doesn't come with clear disclosure of what the DRM does etc.
Hell, I bet not one DRM'd cd/dvd or DRM-limited piece of hardware has any visible warning label spelling out what restrictions it imposes compared to what the customer might reasonably expect.
Re:Vaginas for Jesus: Nice real nice, REMOVE IT (Score:1, Insightful)
These are part of the answer why most internet publicists don't allow the public to comment the news. Which is a shame since some readers do have something interesting to say.
Understatement of the year... (Score:5, Insightful)
Huh? "Reasonably difficult"? This damned thing broke Russinovich's [technet.com] machine, and he had to use several utilities he developed himself to get rid of it by looking deeper into the Windows OS than I think Microsoft ever intended (or wanted) anyone to look. How many
"Difficult to uninstall"? Right...
Wonder who really gets to pay... (Score:5, Insightful)
Artist monthly statement:
Sales: $$$
Gross royalties (tiny%): $
Deductions:
[ blah blah blah ] $$
DRM legal costs $$
[new this month]
Net Royalties: -$$$
[NB: you won't have to pay us because we're nice like that, we'll just carry it forward]
Re:How About... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why are they even paying this man?
Re:If someone in their basement pulled the exact.. (Score:5, Insightful)
All the rights of an individual with hardly any of the responsibilities.
Re:How About... (Score:3, Insightful)
Listen.... it doesn't matter that they're separate departments. Its. The. Same. Company. Saying "Oh its just the music department, all those other departments are ok," is just a cop-out. At least be honest that you don't really care.
Re:How About... (Score:1, Insightful)
If he did, the shareholders would fire him. That, incidentally, is why corporations are more evil than any individual.
The REAL point of a class action lawsuit (Score:3, Insightful)
-Eric
Re:Not bad (Score:2, Insightful)
Also, their player program that shipped with the rootkit CDs had a 'phone-home' function that loaded a banner from the web. It didn't actually provide Sony any personal data other than the user's IP address, but Sony should be required to track down anyone still running the rootkit player and assist them in removing their software. If they can track down file-sharers using an IP address they should be required to do the same to clean up their mess.