The Grassroots Blogging Provision's Real Purpose 227
ICantFindADecentNick writes "The Register carries a report on the defeat of Section 220 of the reform bill (the grassroots provision). In an all-too-familiar scene, bloggers, Slashdot readers and several news outlets were taken in by the hype surrounding a provision in the Senate ethics reform bill that would have required grassroots lobbying firms to register with the US Congress. To be fair, some commenters did see through the deception but the campaign, organized by Richard Viguerie, still succeeded. From the article: 'Viguerie, for those not familiar with the tarnished panoply of backroom players in American politics, pioneered the use of direct mail techniques for conservative causes, and has been called the "funding father" of the modern conservative movement. His ad agency currently handles direct mail campaigns for non-profits seeking to stimulate grassroots activity or raise funds from the general public.'" This is, of course, The Register. Still interesting to look back at the news from another point of view.
right... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:throwing the baby out with the bathwater (Score:5, Informative)
Tarnished Backroom (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Hooray for "editors"! (Score:2, Informative)
Cheers,
Craig
Re:Biased summary (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Bad summary (Score:2, Informative)
If you are PAID to express an opinion then how can the speech be free?
Re:Hooray for "editors"! (Score:3, Informative)
you're comparing apples and oranges there
(of course companies DO lie in their advertising and packaging quite often, just in ways that aren't easily discernible)
SB