Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship

Top 10 List of Worldwide Internet Censors 115

PreacherTom writes "Reports of internet censorship are nothing new and are quite expected from countries whose leadership depends on controlling the popular worldview. Reporters Without Borders, a Paris group that does advocacy work for press freedom, puts a number to the trend with a list of the countries that it says go the furthest to censor the Internet. Photos document the worldwide protests and continuing struggles. Not surprisingly, China is described as the pioneer of internet censors, dedicating more resources than any other country to restrict online freedoms." This week we also discussed the Reporters Without Borders' 13 Enemies of the Internet list.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Top 10 List of Worldwide Internet Censors

Comments Filter:
  • Summary (Score:4, Informative)

    by Mr2001 ( 90979 ) on Monday November 13, 2006 @03:39AM (#16820632) Homepage Journal
    Myanmar, China, Belarus, Iran, Tunisia, Cuba, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Vietnam, North Korea, Syria, and Uzbekistan.
  • by OverlordQ ( 264228 ) on Monday November 13, 2006 @03:44AM (#16820652) Journal
    It was 13 not ten.

    Myanmar, China, Belarus, Iran, Tunisia, Cuba, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Vietnam, North Korea, Syria, and Uzbekistan


    Did anybody (Editors/Submitter) RTFA? I mean the first line of the article is:

    Reporters Without Borders calls out China, Myanmar, Belarus, and 10 other countries for quashing online political and religious expression


    Some simple math, 1 = China, 2 = Myanmar, 3 = Belarus . . . and then add another 10 . . . That gives you 13, well at least around here it does.
  • Re:Summary (Score:4, Informative)

    by zeromorph ( 1009305 ) on Monday November 13, 2006 @04:30AM (#16820840)
    Myanmar, China, Belarus, Iran, Tunisia, Cuba, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Vietnam, North Korea, Syria, and Uzbekistan.

    Technically we have a dupe here, the article [businessweek.com] is actually totally based on the Reporters without borders press release [rsf.org] we discussed [slashdot.org] a few days ago. The list of enemies is also identical with the list of censors:

    Belarus, Burma, China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Vietnam (Only Burma is called Myanmar.)

  • by ebonum ( 830686 ) on Monday November 13, 2006 @05:12AM (#16820958)
    As an American who has relocated to work in China, I have yet to have problems with the censors. The ping times and transfer rates to and from the US are really slow, but I can get to everything I need. I can read the NYTimes, WSJ, CNN and, most importantly, ./. I can even read this post and all the comments, even the ones that bash the Chinese Government. I don't think it's because the censors are asleep today. For instance, there was a story today in the WSJ today that covered the riots at a hospital in southern China. I'm sure the official news, Xin Hua, forgot to cover the even, but that didn't stop me from reading the story. To say that the government has this firm grip on the Chinese people is nothing more than a clear sign of ignorance. There are far to many people here for the government to even think about trying to keep an eye on everyone or maintaining tight control. Also, the techniques that are highly effective for tracking people in the US don't exist here. This is a cash society. You can go for months or years without leaving any electronic record of your existence. In the US, you can't even drive down the road without your license plate number being picked up or buy breakfast without your debit card indicating that you where Noah's Bagels on University Ave. at 7:07AM and that you bought the Kona Blend. Organizations such as the NSA have deep pockets, tremendous resources, and some very smart people.

            For 99.99% or the people here, we are free to go about our business. As long as you are not advocating the overthrow of the government or engaging in illegal activities you aren't going to have too many problems here. (disclaimer: business where there is a lot of money at stake are another matter) I need not remind you how the laws have been changing in the US for anyone implicated in overthrowing the US government. Try going to websites that advocate the overthrow of the US government and have bomb making instructions. Better yet, set one up inside the US and see how long it is till you get censored. See if the two governments are really all the different. Governments defend themselves. You might not agree with the ways they do it, but they do it nonetheless. And of course the US government has NEVER tried to cover anything bad they they did up...

    I'm not implying that I'm a big supporter of the Chinese government. There are a lot of things they need to improve on and change. The list is very long. However, the Chinese government is making massive improvements every year and should be given credit for doing so.

    I write this b/c I think there is a tremendous amount of misunderstanding in the US of what it is really like to live in China.
  • by Lorean ( 756656 ) on Monday November 13, 2006 @05:58AM (#16821160)
    Oh really? I live in Beijing myself. Here are some websites for you to try accessing:
    www.wikipedia.org (do a wikipedia search on tiananmen massacre and then see what happend)
    news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4960762.stm
    www.blogspot.com

    Oh here's an interesting tidbit of knowledge for you slashdoters. Accessing most Western websites from China is blasted slow. But running bittorrent is just as fast as if I was back home. (For some reason I recently started to be able to stream youtube videos, haven't quite figure that one out)
  • by owlnation ( 858981 ) on Monday November 13, 2006 @07:55AM (#16821664)
    It's more than that, but the other countries they seem to have ignored. And curiously for a French organisation they have omitted France, whom along with Germany, heavily censors anything Nazi. (Thus driving the large and ever growing larger numbers of Nazi Germans more underground, and obscuring their danger).
  • by Bryansix ( 761547 ) on Monday November 13, 2006 @12:21PM (#16824442) Homepage
    Straw Man Argument - You set up the Libertarians as a party defined by love of corporations when they are better defined for a love of small government

    Straw Man Argument - You seek to align Libertarian with Emo Hipsters in an attempt to make them look retarded

    False Dichotomy - You state that people who espouse libertarianism are either in bed with the corporations of the day or are emo hipsters. The reality of the situation is much more diverse in nature then you let on
    Hopefully you will learn that such posts will not make you achieve good karma any sooner and will always be shot down. First think, then post.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...