.xxx registry sues US government 225
An anonymous reader writes in to say that "ICM Registry LLC, the company behind the proposed .xxx internet porn domain, is to sue two departments of the US government for access to documents it claims show the US pressured ICANN into rejecting the domain.
The Florida-based startup will sue the Department of Commerce and the Department of State to get them to release documents that they redacted when they responded to a Freedom Of Information Act request that ICM filed last year."
WTF? Redacted? (Score:5, Interesting)
I thought the government was only allowed to redact documents obtained under the FOIA to preserve national security. Since when does letting people have a naughty domain name threaten national security?
FFS, kick the knee-jerking puritans out of office already.
Why?! This .xxx registry is a big blockage. (Score:3, Interesting)
It ALSO makes it easier to block. No more wack-a-mole with porn sites.*
Unless that your kind of thing. Nothing wrong with that.
Re:WTF? Redacted? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Why?! This .xxx registry is a big waste of spac (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Why?! This .xxx registry is a big waste of spac (Score:2, Interesting)
The issue I think is that so many sites on
From the start-your-moaning dept. (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm not really sure how to take that tagline...
Anyway, why shouldn't there be a xxx domain? Not mandatory, but if a particular site wants to say right up front, "Hey, I'm porn," what's wrong with that? Maybe it seems a little much to give a whole domain to a single topic, but if you don't want to accidentally see porn it gives you a decent way to greatly reduce the amount you see, and it's one of those universal things in our (and by our I mean the whole world's) society, there's some people that want to see porn and some that don't, and at most a very very small percentage that don't care one way or the other. Give the way TLDs are used these days it seems a hell of a lot more useful than any of the others beside .gov and .edu. Doesn't hurt anyone either, anyone that wants to find porn can find it in as long as it takes to type "porn [google.com]" in the Google search box.
Don't get me wrong, it's not a "strong" in the computer science meaning of the word filter, but it's decent and it helps out people on both sides of the fence. I don't see why this is being fought. Is disallowing this TLD going to stop porn on the Internet? Am I missing something here?
Re:WTF? Redacted? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Why?! This .xxx registry is a big waste of spac (Score:1, Interesting)
You just don't get it. Pron is not difficult to find now. What's a lot more difficult (relatively) is filtering it out. If you take all of the existing pron sites and force them to move to
I wonder what would happen if.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:WTF? Redacted? (Score:2, Interesting)
I tend to agree and hope the rest of the
So, who will our third party candidate be this year?
Re:The fundamentalists fear it will encourage porn (Score:3, Interesting)
In addition, they don't want [go.com] a new vaccine that prevents early stage cervical cancer and cancer lesions caused by HPV infection, because this may encourage teenagers to be more sexually promiscuous.
To restate: they would rather watch teenagers die a horrible death through cancer, than allow teens to bump and grind a little.