Microsoft's Bold Patent Move 571
theodp writes "On Thursday, the USPTO disclosed that Microsoft has a patent pending for displaying numbers in a box to make them stand out. " Check out the images to see the power of this breakthrough patent. That's almost impossible to do without patents.
Next: Microsoft patents the patent (Score:4, Funny)
I'm sure they are working on a patent that covers the process of applying for a patent.
From the patent application: (Score:5, Funny)
Thiti Wang-Aryattawanich
I'd just like to know his nickname, is all...
Re:Well... (Score:3, Funny)
I read the entire patent application. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hey... Microsoft? (Score:1, Funny)
Why not patent this: (Score:3, Funny)
If not, I'm filling out my forms right now, and someone around here's gonna owe me a lot of money.
Re:Prior art (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Am I dumb? (Score:5, Funny)
No
And even if a poster did such a thing, it would never get through
Another Idea (Score:2, Funny)
Wow! Innovative! (Score:5, Funny)
+----------+
| Amazing! |
+----------+
Re:Well... (Score:5, Funny)
I've got MS right where I want them... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I read the entire patent application. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Quick, lets patent DNA! (Score:5, Funny)
The claims made are:
"By inserting the gene into a compatible host via a retrovirus, that host becomes capable of using and activating advanced equipment left behind by our now dead anscestors who just happened to invent the Latin language."
I mean, does that sound rediculous or what? The patent office should go back to requiring working models of an invention as proof!
Re:Next: Microsoft patents the patent (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Well... (Score:3, Funny)
Aren't the two mutually exclusive?
Re:Post Text Missing? (Score:2, Funny)
That's... um.... creepy, dude. (Score:3, Funny)
bad news/good news (Score:5, Funny)
The bad news is that the USPTO granted Microsoft assanine patent.
The good news is that we slashdotted the USPTO (and I just saved a bundle on my car insurance)
Re:Well... (Score:5, Funny)
Aren't the two mutually exclusive?
It's Perl we are talking about here...
Re:Uh oh! (Score:5, Funny)
Not 5 minutes ago, I recieved an email consisting of, and I quote, "Goddamned slashdot linked the USPTO again during work hours, guess I'm staying late today..."
Re:Simple Solution (Score:1, Funny)
(No offense to any aforementioned bastards in the audience.
Re:Well... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Well... (Score:5, Funny)
Hell, no, they aren't mutually exclusive.
Look at George Bush.
Only in natural languages! (Score:1, Funny)
At least binary and hex are still safe!
It may look ugly? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:CSS (Score:5, Funny)
Biggest lies ever told (apologies for off-color reference):
1. The check is in the mail
2. Don't worry, I won't come in your mouth
3. We're from the government and we're here to help
4. This patent is only for defense
Re:Am I dumb? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Well... (Score:2, Funny)
Alright, now you've done it. (Score:1, Funny)
Godwin's law strikes again!
Uhhh, This thread's over now.
Re:From the patent application: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Well... (Score:3, Funny)
A perl regular expression beat her in a beauty contest!
Re:Well... (Score:5, Funny)
No it isn't. Although, to be fair, it does have exceptional support for write only programmers
Re:Well... (Score:3, Funny)
You Laugh... (Score:2, Funny)
An even bolder patent move (Score:2, Funny)