The Grinch Who Patented Christmas 207
theodp writes "The USPTO has reversed its earlier rejection and notified Amazon that the patent application for CEO Jeff Bezos' invention, Coordinating Delivery of a Gift, has been examined and is allowed for issuance as a patent. BTW, Amazon was represented before the USPTO by Perkins Coie, who also supplied Bezos with legal muscle in his personal fight against zoning laws that threatened to curb the size of his Medina mansion (reg.) before the City of Medina eventually gave up on regulating the size of homes (reg.)."
Re:Isn't this obvious (Score:1, Insightful)
Since the USPTO is letting just ANYTHING through.. (Score:2, Insightful)
A little freedom, eh? (Score:4, Insightful)
What the hell does the size of Bezos' home have to do with a patent? That's right, NOTHING! We have something in this country called liberty and if Bezos owns land and wants to build a house that uses 99.9% of it, he should be able to build it. City councils dictating to folks about the style and size of private homes is over the line. Safety standards and building codes are fine within reason.
Oh, and the patent sucks, Bezos is a jerk...
Re:A little freedom, eh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, no morelooking up the Zip Code.. (Score:2, Insightful)
So, after reading the patent, as I understand it, I am allowed to look up a Zip Code for my personal enjoyment, but if I do it for a web client sending a package to someone, I have to licence the right to look up the freeken zip code !!!
Un Friggen Believable..
Re:A little freedom, eh? (Score:3, Insightful)
Penalties (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Isn't this obvious (Score:3, Insightful)
The Good, The Bad, and The Stupid (Score:4, Insightful)
There is prior art here. In fact, it's basically what UPS, FedEx, Airborn Express does already if there's a problem with a delivery. It's basically how the Post Office handles undeliverables. They contact the recipient based on additional information in their database, including home phone, business phone or e-mail.
Just look at the opener to the "invention's" background: The Internet comprises a vast number of computers that are interconnected for the purpose of exchanging information. Various protocols, such as the HyperText Transfer Protocol ("HTTP"), have been defined to aid in this exchange of information." You gotta be kidding me! Remember when you were in grade school, and there was always that one kid who opened his report with "Webster's defines 'x' as...'? That's what this sounds like to me. You know what Bezos and crew invented? They invented a way to transmit bullshit over the Internet.
Re:The courts are not to blame (Score:3, Insightful)
"A person shall be entitled to a patent unless--
(a) he invention WAS KNOWN OR USED by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or"
"A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically DISCLOSED OR DESCRIBED a"
These are subjective things 'known' 'used' 'disclosed' 'described' determined first by a patent examiner. The judicial branch only becomes involved later, when they are faced with the situation where the patent officer has already effectively accepted that it is not "KNOWN OR USED" or "DISCLOSED OR DESCRIBED " and are taking a challenge.
So the Judicial branch make their interpretation in the context that the patent officer has done his job.
If I'm wrong then please point me to US case law where the patent office has refused a patent because it is 'known' or 'used' and the courts have then set an interpretation that overrules them.
Re:Gamer (Score:2, Insightful)
Because net worth is how to measure how important you are, and not how well you can game the system, right? Everyone who's rich deserves it, and everyone who's poor, too. Right?
Re:why pick on Amazon? (Score:3, Insightful)
Because Amazon's patents are particularly evil: they try to patent trivial business methods.
I'm sure you can find plenty to pick on in [IBM's] applications.
Go ahead and review their applications and let us know. We complain about the patents that we know about.
Not to mention that Amazon is often on the receiving end of patent aggression.
All the worse that Amazon is engaging in this kind of conduct themselves and isn't more aggressively working towards changing the patent system.
Note that Amazon's patents do not help them defend against that sort of abuse.
Re:A little freedom, eh? (Score:2, Insightful)
What you're saying is if someone wants to build a MIssle Silo or Sewage Treatment Plant next door too your home, They should be allowed, regardless of Zoning Laws.
What about if someone wants to convert the alleyway behind their house to a shed or herb garden, blocking access to anyone else who uses that alley? Is that OK too?
How about if someone wants to build a three-storey Lego-Brick on their property, all the way to the fence, while every other house in the street is a small country-style cottage?
Re:Move to Mexico (Score:1, Insightful)
Doesn't FedEx ... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Gamer (Score:3, Insightful)
Bezos net worth in 2003 was $4.95 billion dollars.
Here is the OP quote, including the half you deleted:
>I'm sorry, does Bezos actually have a clue about doing things, or is all he knows how to game the patent and legal system?
The sheer size of Bezos's net worth isn't relevant to the question, which was concerned with its origin.
In most circles, getting a parcel delivered on time and to the right address is considered a good thing.
And is preventing others from doing likewise also considered a good thing?