Sony's New Nagging Copy Protection 404
bort27 writes "You can put away your Sharpies, because Sony has launched a new CD copy protection scheme that is actually designed to be easily cracked: 'The copy-protection technology is...far from ironclad. Apple Macintosh users currently face no restrictions at all. What's more, if users go to a Web site to complain about the lack of iPod compatibility, Sony BMG will send them an email with a back door measure on how to work around the copy protection.'"
Change your business model instead. (Score:2, Insightful)
FtA: "The whole industry is in discussions with Apple, and we hope to have a solution soon," he said.
The "solution" he wants will lock Apple's customers into the music cartel's own brand of DRM. How is that solving anything for the consumer? Fucking prick.
ok... (Score:5, Insightful)
Interesting... (Score:5, Insightful)
The sad part... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Interesting... (Score:3, Insightful)
Media company bisiness plan: (Score:1, Insightful)
2: Record them
3: Sell recordings
4: Profit!
Seriously, the problem with record sales isn't "piracy [talklikeapirate.com]", but a shortage of stuff worth buying.
Lawsuit shortlist? (Score:4, Insightful)
The scary part to me is the e-mail address... now they can start getting a shortlist of people to look at closer for copyright violation issues. I know I'll let someone else ask for the hack and Google it myself...
Sony Assumes too Much (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm waiting for game developers to do this... (Score:4, Insightful)
I know it's totally irrelevant, but given the Sony 'initiative' and the fact they publish games... I'm waiting for this to happen too
What about Sony / BMG's existing DRM? (Score:3, Insightful)
Sony / BMG are making CDs using SunnComm's MediaMaxx that require a software end user licence agreement (EULA) to listen to on a computer, and they can not be ripped into an MP3 or an AAC file. Hence I have no way to listen to these albums on my iPod. I don't believe in agreeing to a EULA to listen to these songs on my home PC, so I can't use these CDs on my PC. And to pay $12-$15 for a CD that I can only listen for twenty minutes on the way to work or doing errands is crazy.
Why is the industry shooting itself in the foot by driving away loyal customers? I want to give bands like Velvet Revolver, Kings of Leon, and the Foo Fighters my hard earned money, but their record labels are not giving me a product that I find acceptable... A good old fashioned compact disk.
its a trojan horse (Score:5, Insightful)
call me paranoid
Jonathan
Re:The sad part... (Score:5, Insightful)
Hold Shift? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Interesting... (Score:3, Insightful)
Hey TMM, good to hear from ya. Could be a concern. If you are going to rip a song and distribute it to friends, you certainly don't want to advertize the fact even if it was easy to do.
Personally, I don't believe in distributing -- I think copyright should be honored within the bounds of fair use. To that end, I routinely strip out any encumbrance that interferes with my fair use rights, mostly because I don't want to have to keep up with some technology for years to come just to listen to my legally obtained songs. So anytime I get a copy protected CD, I always save the songs to my computer for backup in 320k bit format, then remaster the CD to play the way I want it to. And keep the original CD for proof of ownership. Same goes for DVDs (plus, I dump the unable to skip advertisements MPAA thinks everyone wants to watch every time they watch a DVD). But that's just me.
Sony's Next DRM innovation (Score:2, Insightful)
The revolutionary "imaginary" copy protection. Prominently featured on every product, a sharp and stylish sticker heralding the state-of-the-art "Sony Super-Fantastic Copy Protection 5000," a technology so advanced, it can't even be detected! Customers thinking of trying to subvert this new DRM can call an 800 number, where a helpful, sweet-sounding old lady will gently encourage them to do the right thing, so as not to disappoint their mothers and grandmothers.
Re:The sad part... (Score:2, Insightful)
WARNING it's a trap! (Score:5, Insightful)
Sony BMG will send them the back door (Score:3, Insightful)
Note: This was in the context of copying a Sony DRM protected song to your iPod...
This is a tacit admission by Sony that copying the song from the CD to another device falls within the realm of fair use (meaning you don't need Sony's permission to copy it yourself). Obviously most informed consumers believe that but some testamony in recent lawsuits have been arguing against it. It also means that Sony may have a difficult time suing anyone for breaking the new DRM if they plan to tell you how to do so themselves. It, however, could be a problem with the DMCA, as Sony might be telling you how to circumvent Apple's DRM. Should be interesting to see if Apple responds.
When will they learn? (Score:3, Insightful)
I've got over 1,500 vinyl albums of music of all types, over 1,000 of which I've never played. I've bought them at garage sales and auctions for maybe $100 total. I'm going through and listening, digitizing the ones I like.
So to the Inferno with you, Sony, and may your cash registers melt in the flames of your corporate soul.
Re:Sony Assumes too Much (Score:5, Insightful)
I would if I had to keep the tag on even after I've bought the item.
Re:Interesting... (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm also guessing that many fewer people are going out to buy the new track when they can find out it sucks from a friend 1st.
Re:ok... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The sad part... (Score:5, Insightful)
Have you ever been to the movies? Some theaters have infrared lights behind the screen to thward movie copying. Thus, you've bought a copy-protected product.
Do you own a car? Go ahead and try to reverse-engineer the electronics and you'll find out what many mom-and-pop repair shops already know -- it's copy protected.
Ever read a newspaper? Copyright protection there, which some people see as copy protection. And if you go along with that line of thinking, then look at the bottom of your screen where it says "© 1997-2005 OSTG." That's right -- Slashdot is protected by copyright, and thus, laws against copying its content. In other words --copy protection.
There's no point in fighting the war. You've already lost.
Bad copy protection (Score:2, Insightful)
"Casual" piracy? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Soft Security, Guide Posts: right on! (Score:3, Insightful)
Under your analogy, it'd be perfectly reasonable for someone to put a barrier keeping you from entering your own property. Under property law that'd be a nuisance and would clearly be illegal.
Re:The sad part... (Score:5, Insightful)
Furthermore, the auto electronics do prevent reverse engineering and diagnostics, but they aren't "copy protection". Your mechanic is not trying to make a copy of the engine, he's trying to figure out what's wrong to fix it.
Infrared lights in theaters? Cable signals? Yup, that is copy protection. The others are not.
Re:Soft Security, Guide Posts: right on! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Let's just hope.... (Score:1, Insightful)