Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy United States Your Rights Online

Bush Wants Right to ISP Customer Data 565

bryan8m writes "Wired is reporting that the Bush administration wants back the ability to make ISPs turn over information on their customers. The U.S. Court of Appeals is handling the case and of course the feds want to hide details of it from the public. The law giving the government the power to seize communications records from 1986 was strengthened in 2001 by the Patriot Act and struck down after the ACLU challenged it."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bush Wants Right to ISP Customer Data

Comments Filter:
  • by taniwha ( 70410 ) on Monday May 30, 2005 @06:38PM (#12679090) Homepage Journal
    on the contrary, Bush is convinced there is .... and he's gonna make sure that damned sleigh gets searched by the bozos at TSA each and every time
  • Time to (Score:5, Funny)

    by FidelCatsro ( 861135 ) <fidelcatsro&gmail,com> on Monday May 30, 2005 @06:41PM (#12679123) Journal
    Execute order 66
  • Shaddup! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30, 2005 @06:44PM (#12679148)
    Yer all a bunch of commie pinko liberal America-haters. Our President is doing the BEST HE CAN to protect us from terrorism, and he NEEDS these powers.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30, 2005 @06:45PM (#12679161)
    After a quick browsing of the ISP records they could know a lot about us... It seems that you have been living two lives. In one life, you are Thomas A. Anderson, program writer for a respectable software company. You have a social security number, you pay your taxes and you help your land lady carry out her garbage. In the other you are an annoying slashdot troll under the alias "Anonymous Coward" and are guilty of virtually every computer crime we have a law for, including extreme comparisons of the Bush administration to fictional works such as The Matrix or 1984. One of these lives has a future... In all seriousness, though, I can't see how giving the government access to ISP records is going to beneficial to the people. Guess the Department of Homeland Security is getting bored and needs something to do.
  • by Valacosa ( 863657 ) on Monday May 30, 2005 @06:48PM (#12679181)
    Seriously, if things keep on going on the way they are, I can see a lot of personals like this popping up:

    "Single, white 22-year old Canadian male willing to `marry' American female fleeing fascist regime. Must be intelligent and conversational. Preferably aged 19-25, ethnicity unimportant."
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30, 2005 @07:01PM (#12679272)


    http://www.marryanamerican.ca/ [marryanamerican.ca]

  • by Decameron81 ( 628548 ) on Monday May 30, 2005 @07:04PM (#12679289)
    Give it a little more time... These things don't happen overnight.
    ...and just when you thought you were helping good Bush end the war and bring peace he will do a dark side lighting on Richard Stallman and throw him out of the window...
  • Re:Paranoia (Score:3, Funny)

    by geomon ( 78680 ) on Monday May 30, 2005 @07:06PM (#12679295) Homepage Journal
    Sigh... here goes another moonbat delusional hatefest on Slashdot.

    Mocking Republicans for doing the same stuff that Democrats were demonized for is pure sport for Libertarians.

    The sooner people realize that there is a fractional difference between the two, the sooner we can return to true competition in politics.

    Republicans=Democrats who used to smoke pot until their kids started stealing their stash.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30, 2005 @07:06PM (#12679299)
    As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly stop this insanity. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither Slashdot nor its current rung on the ladder to total power. Unless you share my view that I indeed hope that Slashdot's punishment fits its crime, there's no need for you to hear me further. According to the laws of probability, I feel that Slashdot has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. It obviously has none, or it wouldn't use antidisestablishmentarianism as a more destructive form of diabolism.

    Should we blindly trust such superficial, gruesome boneheads? Slashdot's bedfellows insist that "Slashdot is a perpetual victim of injustice." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that Slashdot's hariolations are about as useful to society as a hundred deutsche marks were in 1923 Germany, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, Slashdot somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. Slashdot's propositions will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that. Slashdot's artifices are a hotbed of corporatism. But you knew that already. So let me add that Slashdot keeps saying that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. For some reason, Slashdot's forces actually believe this nonsense.

    Like a lion after tasting the blood of human victims, Slashdot will feed us ever-larger doses of its lies and crackpot assumptions. Please let me explain that ignorance is bliss. This may be why Slashdot's cringers are generally all smiles. The long and short of it is that Slashdot struts like a god on Mount Olympus, looking down on us mortals below. In view of that, it is not surprising that I don't need to tell you that in Slashdot's line of business, you don't need to know what you're talking about. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that Slashdot's factotums all look like Slashdot, think like Slashdot, act like Slashdot, and make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up, just like Slashdot does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha! If Slashdot were as bright as it thinks it is, it'd know that I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that it shouldn't take a condescending cheap shot at a person that most insane gutter-dwellers will never be in a position to condescend to. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate its philippics are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. Unfortunately, Slashdot's stubborn prognoses neglect to take one important factor into consideration: human nature. Common sense and scientific evidence agree: If we don't remove the Slashdot threat now, it will bite us in our backside as soon as our backs are turned.

    Will the worst kinds of spineless mountebanks there are ever oppose our human vices wherever they may be found -- arrogance, hatred, jealousy, unfaithfulness, avarice, and so on? Don't bet on it. Pessimism is dangerous. Slashdot's self-centered version of it is doubly so. If I may be permitted to make an observation, when you tell Slashdot's emissaries that Slashdot's litanies are filled with a number of very clear-cut and blatant lies -- lies of both om
  • Re:Shaddup! (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30, 2005 @07:23PM (#12679413)
    Yer all a bunch of commie pinko liberal America-haters. Our President is doing the BEST HE CAN to protect us from terrorism, and he NEEDS these powers.

    Now Edith, get me a beer, eh? Meathead, when are you gonna get a job. I'll give Polacks credit when credit is due. Now stifle yourself.

  • by Ki Master George ( 768244 ) on Monday May 30, 2005 @07:38PM (#12679520)
    Yeah, I really hate facists, too. What, with all their faces and all.
  • Re:Shaddup! (Score:2, Funny)

    by cp.tar ( 871488 ) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Monday May 30, 2005 @08:20PM (#12679767) Journal
    Chancellor Palpatine IS DOING THE BEST HE CAN to protect us from the Trade Union and the war and everything, and he NEEDS these powers.

    Sorry... what was I saying?

  • by timbo234 ( 833667 ) on Monday May 30, 2005 @11:03PM (#12680836) Journal
    Witnessing the political-tribal call of the young male goldenchested Libertarian is a prized event for anthropologists....


    If only the same were true for trolls you might have another way of getting attention besides posting flamebait on slashdot
  • by Dabido ( 802599 ) on Tuesday May 31, 2005 @01:00AM (#12681490)
    "one of their "scientists" had slime growing under their sink. Man, thats a whole WMD program right there, our country was clearly in imminent danger from those stinky mildew-wielding terrists"

    This has to do with the US finding Weapons of Mass Disposal units doesn't it? They had to go in for sanitation reasons! What do you think Bush meant when he said he was going to "clean up the world"? It's all about the hygene, and any dictator we find not showering and living in a little rat infested hole, just isn't hygenic enough to run a country. I say, strip them down to the underpants and scrub them with some steel wool and Jif! Let's clean up Iraq!

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...