Passport Chip Could Attract High-Tech Muggers 348
Orangez writes "Wired.com reports that 'business travel groups, security experts and privacy advocates are looking to derail a government plan to insert remotely readable chips in American passports, calling the chips homing devices for high-tech muggers, identity thieves and even terrorists.' and that 'The 64-KB chips will include the information from the photo page of the passport, including name, date of birth and a digitized form of the passport picture.'"
Solution (Score:0, Interesting)
security (Score:5, Interesting)
just a thought
hmm... (Score:3, Interesting)
This is a dupe - no, wait ... (Score:4, Interesting)
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/28/1
Or is it a trip?
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/23/2
A quad? (Quap?)
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/27/0
Quint? Penta?
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/10/22/0
So
Re:why are travellers worried? (Score:5, Interesting)
Stalking is illegal for a reason. Even if no physical contact is ever made it constitutes harassment. Harassment leads to a degradation of the quality of life, poor performance at work, and after extended periods of time can lead to a psychological breakdown. Creating a population of paranoid schizophrenics isn't all bad. Once they come apart at the seams we can lock them in a cell with a bicycle and use them to produce energy, thus breaking our dependence on oil and negating the need for nuclear fuel. It'll also solve the overpopulation problem if we keep the sexes separated. In the end it'll allow some members of the population, who aren't being harassed or seem to be immune to natural instincts (are they even human then?), to live a life of leisure using the energy of those we have harassed and then locked up.
disabling chip? (Score:4, Interesting)
Here's a link to the standard (Score:3, Interesting)
Document 9303 at the ICAO [icao.int]. Note that it's the international Civil Aviation organization that defined the standard and is pushing it. Note that they intentionally do not encrypt the data so that it's simpler and easier for third world governments to read.
Re:Blame the terrorists. (Score:2, Interesting)
Exactly, because despite popular opinion they're goal is not to go out and kill every single American. Their goal is to go out and make every single American afraid of them, afraid to live their lives.
And Mission Accomplished.
They have successfully reduced my dad, into a withered old man afraid to ever leave the country, who does nothing but curse these damn 'rag-heads'. "We need more legislation and more intrusive government, cause those bastards are everywhere. They want to kill us all. So we need to get em first. Nuke those bastards. We need to kill any and all of them, cause they're all rag-heads and they all want us dead with their 'Islam'."
Who's the real terrorists again dad?
Submit your Comments to the State Department (Score:2, Interesting)
Actually that might be part of the plan (Score:5, Interesting)
My question at that point is: why not use another technology? The whole point of RFID is that it is readable from a distance without jumping through any hoops. If TFA is correct they are negating the whole point of RFID and fighting it's inherent nature to do so. It seems that some kind of optical technology would be perfectly suited to do exactly what they want to do with RFID.
Sweden getting this as well (Score:2, Interesting)
so, im getting a new "regular" passport tomorrow... my current expires in july, no rush, but this new one will last 10 years so why not have it done with
Re:disabling chip? (Score:3, Interesting)
I will just keep mine wrapped in a few layers of aluminium foil until I am standing in line at immigrations thank you.
I can also see, after the media catches on about identity theft via RFID passports some enterprising company will begin selling lead lined passport covers or something similar. This also begs the question why the covers are not lined with an RF blocking material so the chip can only be read when the passport is open in the first place.
Open Secrets (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Actually that might be part of the plan (Score:2, Interesting)
You'd need a smarter RFID. (Score:3, Interesting)
Still, that would leave at least five system weaknesses obvious to even cursory glances:
1) It's still a Mark One RFID initial response; to prevent traffic analysis from making identifying USAssholes (yes, I can say that, I am one) trivial for hostile entities, there need to be a lot more responding Mark One RFIDs chirping away out there.
2) The specific query to the RFID could be played back. This might be solvable by inclusion of a random number component with in the initial response.
3) Every Mark Two RFID query generator needs to have the signature capability; the system is only safe until one is stolen and reverse engineered. Giving each it's own marine guard [imdb.com] is liable to increase the expense of the deployment slightly. This might be obviated by an integrity-and-privacy secured uplink connection to a centralized query making server located at Fort Meade [nsa.gov].
4) This still implies US passport holders should trust the US government to be able to secretly and silently find out exactly who they are at any time. Survey says...
5) I'm betting the computation for signature checks exceed the RFID remotely powered capabilities; I suspect they don't have much more than needed to play "Marco!".... "Polo!"
Re:Actually that might be part of the plan (Score:3, Interesting)
State Department contractors are looking to include some shielding
My best friend's husband works for a French company called A.S.K. that makes smart cards, and induction cards, and RFID cards, and he was telling me about the process, and how they're bidding for the American Passport contract.
When I mentioned about the tin foil, he said that none of the samples they've delivered to the U.S. have any shielding, and that there's been no talk at all of shielding of any kind.
<Tinfoil Hat>I truly think this talk of shielding is just to pacify us until it's already a done deal, and it's too late to do anything about.</Tinfoil Hat>
Re:Actually that might be part of the plan (Score:3, Interesting)
New terrorist plan: walk around an airport with some sort of high-frequency emitter in a briefcase - frying everybody's RFID passport chips.
Make for a wonderful day at Customs, I'm sure.
Then you'd have to have security guys wandering around the airport with RFID detectors trying to spot excessively powerful transmissions (or hardware in the building to do so and alert security.)
Alternate plan: walk around with the same sort of long-range detectors the state obviously wants to use and suck all the data out of everybody's passport, burn it onto your fake passports (after looking up the individual's photo somewhere and copying that in - since I assume photos will remain the primary identity device in passports) and walk your terrorist army through any Customs.
Next problem: how do ordinary people get their passports with all this data in the chip? Obviously that data will have to be reported - or sucked out of some huge TIA database, right? So this is just to set up once again the "need" for the government to know EVERYTHING about you - so they can issue a fucking passport...