U.S. Justice Dept. Chooses Corel over Microsoft 390
peg0cjs writes "The Justice Department, which challenged Microsoft Corp. in courtrooms for nearly a decade over antitrust violations, will pay more than $2 million each year to buy business software from Corel Corp, according to this article from CANOE. 'The Justice Department will make WordPerfect software available to more than 20 organizations inside the agency, but not the FBI or Drug Enforcement Administration, which use Microsoft's Office business software exclusively, said Mary Aileen O'Donovan, a program manager in the Justice Management Division.' According to the article, the deal is worth up to $13.2 million over five years for Ontario-based Corel. Has sanity finally set in, or is this just a blip in Microsoft's dominance in controlling government software decisions?"
The Reason: Corel's "Microsoft" Modes (Score:1, Informative)
For instance, I installed Quattro Pro and Presentations today after a client's files required them. I almost told the client to go to hell, but as you already know, it's the PROFIT!!?! step that keeps my mouth shut
Both Quattro Pro and Presentations, upon launching, ask if they should be run in "Microsoft Excel" mode and "Microsoft PowerPoint" mode respectively. Not that this does anything to make the programs any better looking, but it does allow for a pre-configured key mapping that most Microsoft Office users will feel comfortable with.
Re:Hrm. (Score:5, Informative)
2. Support contract.
3. Being able to pay a single source for training materials.
Reference... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Hahaha - incorrect (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Doesn't MS own Corel? (Score:5, Informative)
Note MS's Corel shares were a special non-voting kind, which means they had no say in Corel's decision to exit the linux business.
Don't look for sanity... (Score:4, Informative)
No sanity there...
Hahaha on you! (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Doesn't MS own Corel? (Score:3, Informative)
If it is so, isn't this ruling a win-win for MS?
MS owned some non-voting stock in Corel back when it was a public company. Not any longer.
Nothing nefarious here (Score:2, Informative)
By the way, the format issue is so important it is one of the reasons why faxing legal documents is OK, but sending them electronically is not (the local printer may reformat the document while in electronic format).
Re:Updates - already has happened (Score:2, Informative)
standard (Score:2, Informative)
While the "excellence" is debatable, the fact that .doc is a standard isn't.
Re:Alt-F3 Tells All (Score:4, Informative)
No, it doesn't. There is a distinct difference between something being standard, which is what you looked up, and The Standard, which is what you said.
Courts require filings in PDF, not WPD (Score:5, Informative)
That's not true: Federal Courts I know of require PDF.
My wife works for a Federal Appeals court; they use WordPerfect internally but require PDF filings.
Some clients are law firms; all their court filings are in PDF.
could you be any MORE pedantic? (Score:3, Informative)
You keep using the term "standard", but I do not think it means what you think it means.
So he proceeded to define it. "STANDARD" doesn't mean "standards group".
In any case, MS word is THE STANDARD word processing format across the world. De facto. There is no de jure standard. So it is The Standard. It sucks, you can hate it, but it's reality. Perhaps some day enough people will want to change that. Apparently not today.
Re:Alt-F3 Tells All (Score:2, Informative)