No Honor Among Malware Purveyors 416
metalion writes "True to the saying 'no honor among thieves,' adware company, Avenue Media, is finding that competing adware company, DirectRevenue, is detecting and deleting their software. Now Avenue Media is crying foul and have filed a lawsuit against DirectRevenue stating that DirectRevenue 'knowingly and with intent to defraud, exceeded its authorized access to users' computers.' DirectRevenue acknowledges that it may uninstall competing applications in its user license agreement. A researcher at Harvard University, Ben Edelman, reasons that 'Once the computer is infected with 10 different unwanted programs, the person is likely to take some action to address the situation.' Just how far will adware companies go to continue to attempt to bombard us with their ads?"
Too funny (Score:5, Insightful)
Now they are complaining about themselves.
When does it stop?
-nB
fight amongst yourselves (Score:4, Insightful)
We could have a little battlebots competition! The Amazing Bonzi takes on reigning champion THE GATOR.
Malware attacking malware... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:If they succed . . . (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Now here's an idea (Score:4, Insightful)
Just because it is listed in Add/Remove Software doesn't mean it is removed entirely.
I hope the plaintif prevails (Score:5, Insightful)
In fact, just about any attack on the concept of click-through EULAs is pretty good in my book. Scream "contract!" all you want, they're bad for me personally and bad for the industry. Consent and informed consent are two different things and it appears the industry has completely abandonded any pretext of the latter.
TW
Hard to get excited... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:too funny (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm hoping Avenue Media, I make good money removing spyware from people's machines.
Re:If they succed . . . (Score:2, Insightful)
Exceeded its authorized access? (Score:5, Insightful)
And is my mom and other not-so-savvy users granting said authority in the first place? This suit seems riddled with assumptions that it was legal in the first place to install such software.
And since when has malware displayed any EULA - or any UI, for that matter?
Re:too funny (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Ripoff (Score:2, Insightful)
Come on, this is Slashdot. You don't actually expect competence, do you?
Playing CoreWars the Internet... (Score:5, Insightful)
When it will stop. (Score:2, Insightful)
However, when the stupid malware companies realize that what they really need to do is be more like the true biologial parasite, then it may slow down. A RL parasite is benign to the host. If they wrote their code so that you never knew it was there, you would never know to complain now would you?
Re:If they succed . . . (Score:5, Insightful)
This lawsuit is about some adware going outside the boundaries of their advertised function, and removing other adware and only telling the users by the fine print of the EULA.
Re:Well... (Score:4, Insightful)
We have, It's called Linux.
Mozilla is the key along with a system that is better suited to internet attachment.
Perhaps they should sue their customers (Score:3, Insightful)
So, the users should be punished for violating the copyright on the software they didn't want in the first place, and was installed without their knowledge.
Re:Now here's an idea (Score:2, Insightful)
But on a clean install, there IS no spyware to uninstall. So how can you install the first program without breaking...wait, that's brilliant!
Advertisers in general are going insane (Score:5, Insightful)
A lady in El Paso gets a telemarketing call. She says no, repeatedly. Telemarketer ignores her, repeatedly. She hangs up, forcefully.
She later gets a letter saying:
So, we have:
OK, I move that we commit all advertisers to institutions for the criminally insane, right now.
Any seconds?
Re:When it will stop. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:too funny (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:When it will stop. (Score:2, Insightful)
Said home company could then gather up all the data, find out what sites are being visited the most, and direct their 'customers' to advertise at said sites.
If done properly, even 10 of these types of programs should not be noticable...
Or something...
Off to the patent office with me! Gotta patent the idea before them aweful software companies steal it!
hum (Score:2, Insightful)
Honor among thieves (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Firmware ADS. (Score:3, Insightful)
oh wait....
Re:Cool! (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually it only needs to deliver advertising/spamming/phishing revenue. If it hitches a ride on a worm, that would make it even more fit.
Damage to the network is a "neutral" trait until it starts to interfere with spyware downloads.
Re:When it will stop. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Well... (Score:1, Insightful)
Because it is. Have you tried to kill Messenger access to the Internet? Microsoft has played every trick in the book to make sure that this program can get through any firewall unless you make the firewall so tight that you might as well have no Internet access whatsoever.
My point is that your remedies will only be effective so long as Microsoft allows them to be. As long as Windows code is hidden behind a proprietary screen, you will never know. Linux and other software, however, being Open Source, will never be able to hide this for long.
Pay no attention to this post. Continue to bask in the warm glow of your secure systems.
EULAs not intended to be read (Score:2, Insightful)
I didn't get very far, though. Before it would boot (acutally, install Windows from a restore parition) the software wanted my to agree to two click-through EULAs, one from Microsoft and one from IBM. The funny part is that the license texts, which would have required tens of pages each if printed for sure, was displayed in two tiny text areas, only three text lines high. There was no option to save or print the licenses, and, if I call correctly, there was even some music playing in the background.
The point is, noone is intended to read these texts. I'm not sure what implications that has for the validity of this kind of licenses in various jurisdictions (IANAL etc), but the whole situation is just weird.
(Needless to say, I powered off the machine at that point and net-booted a Debian installer.)
Re:If they succed . . . (Score:2, Insightful)
But that is how most adware gets installed in the first place. If the fine print of the EULA is good enough to authorize an install, it should be good enough to authorize a removal. It is, after all, the end users computer. These companies act like they own the computer instead of the end user.
Actually, this brings to light a larger question.. (Score:5, Insightful)
I think all the EULA's are out of control as to how much control and ownership these companies have over your PC and what right's we as owners of the PC should have reserved.
I keep hoping someday, someone, somewhere will really bring all these EULA's that we are all subjected to each and everytime we install something, under a microscope and start really questioning the legality of said EULA's.
Just my 2 cents...
Long Live the Click-through EULA! (Score:1, Insightful)
Since the user no doubt agreed to it, I see no problem here.
Re:Spyware filing a lawsuit? (Score:0, Insightful)
I really feel sorry for those of you who live in the "land of the free", every day it becomes more obvious that there is NOTHING free about your land. Please, please, please get congress moving on putting up that 40ft high "security" wall around the US, the sooner you are all locked in, the better off the rest of the world will be. Oh wait, no, sell it as "the sooner that we are all locked OUT", that will get congress moving.
I can not believe that I ever wanted to get a green card. Throwing out that application was the best thing I ever did. Had I not done so, I would be waiting around to be drafted by the least competent leader on earth, to go fight a war that pads his friends pockets, yet solves nothing. Oh, and waiting to see if some cop is going to decide that THIS pipe is paraphanalia, and that twig is trafficing.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Too funny (Score:2, Insightful)
The idea of peace through threat of mutually assured destruction pre-dates Reagan. See, for example, the Wikipedia article on MAD [wikipedia.org]. The idea that "the only winning move is not to play" certainly existed outside the movie, but it was the point of the movie. That movie was the way in which that idea, phrased in that way, solidified in the American consciousness.
It's a shame that you choose to post anonymously, since I'd enjoy continuing this conversation.
-Peter
Re:Advertisers in general are going insane (Score:3, Insightful)
Nope, it makes me angry, and it's good to express one's anger. And if enough people express it, maybe we can have our phones back at last. The anger comes from not just your call, no. It comes because your call has come as the second or third time that day that I have been pulled away from what I was doing, ran to a phone that I had been waiting for for some other reason, and it's someone presuming to butt into my private time to try to sell me something. Some people tolerate it fine, good for them. Some people just really want someone to talk to (I've done telemarketing at one point actually, so I know this). The rest of us are busy having our lives, and unless you're going to make a contribution to at least my phone bill, stay the hell off my phone. I pay for it to be used for my purposes, you can't reasonably presume that my priorities include salesmen in my own home at any time that is convenient to them. Friends, family, certainly, these are priorities. Others are trespassers.