Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet United States Your Rights Online

NOAA Adopts New Net Policy 204

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has adopted a new policy which applies to provision of all National Weather Service environmental information, including forecasts, warnings, and observations. In June, /. reported that NOAA was taking comments on the proposed policy. Hundreds of Slashdotters responded. And it made a difference: NOAA will make its data and products available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form and will use other dissemination technologies, e.g. satellite broadcast, NOAA Weather Radio, and wireless, as appropriate. Congrats to the Slash community for making a difference and helping to set US Govt policy.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NOAA Adopts New Net Policy

Comments Filter:
  • free weatherbug? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Lord Ender ( 156273 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @01:51AM (#10971763) Homepage
    Does this mean someone could write a free version of weatherbug that doesn't include the annoying spyware and registration? That'd be nice.
  • by TimmyDee ( 713324 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @01:55AM (#10971781) Homepage Journal
    This just goes to show that not all hope is lost in participatory government. I know I get frustrated at times with how much clout corporations have in government operations, but every now and again I get a little glimmer of hope.
  • Well... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by laughingcoyote ( 762272 ) <barghesthowl@@@excite...com> on Thursday December 02, 2004 @01:59AM (#10971802) Journal

    Least they listen every once in a while. Still, it's good to see that at least ONE agency remembers that the people are supposed to run the government, not the other way around.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 02, 2004 @02:00AM (#10971806)
    Maybe all the "But I'm helpless..." posters should print this story out, and put it on their wall.
  • Re:Fight Club. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by YOU LIKEWISE FAIL IT ( 651184 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @02:04AM (#10971832) Homepage Journal

    I like Chuck Palahniuk as much as the next burnt-out twenty-something office worker, but like Nietzsche, not everything he writes is an endorsement of what comes out of his pen, or for that matter, the gospel truth.

    YLFI,
    a beautiful and unique snowflake
  • by Forbman ( 794277 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @02:07AM (#10971849)
    this lasts.

    All it will take is someone from TWC or some of the other commercial repackagers of NWS information who happens to have been a good RNC/TeamW contributor to put a whisper in Karl Rove's ear that NOAA is out of line here, that those commie freeniks should have to pay for the information, and it will then fall under some blanket of the US PATRIOT Act, National Security, DMCA, etc., so that their handle on the data from NOAA/NWS is impenetrable for the untermenschen (ie., the rest of us).
  • Now.... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by doormat ( 63648 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @02:20AM (#10971900) Homepage Journal
    If we could only get that kind of voice on the issues of copyright and patents!!
  • by Fess_Longhair ( 695896 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @02:29AM (#10971932)
    The big problem with NOAA is getting the data out the door. Even their NWS field offices only get a small piece of what's available, and they have very tight bandwidth limitations. For example, it would be great to get all of the GFS ensemble member grids in real time, but they're largely unavailable; and it's really a small ensemble compared to what the future (should) hold.
  • by rdean400 ( 322321 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @07:20AM (#10972819)
    To whomever identified this point, whether it was a commenter or NOAA staff member:

    "Mission connection: NOAA's information services will support the NOAA mission. As a government agency, NOAA recognizes its core responsibility to protect life and property."

    The responsibility to protect life and property trumps all other concerns. Providing for the security of citizens is the primary responsibility of government. Supplying the data only to commercial entities would be improper delegation of that responsibility.
  • by k98sven ( 324383 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @08:52AM (#10973133) Journal
    What the heck does proprietary matter?

    There are plenty of ISO and ANSI standards which are patent-encumbered. And you usually have to pay money to get access to the standards documents.

    Non-proprietary doesn't mean open.
    And proprietary doesn't mean non-open.

    So what's the point in distinguishing them, then? Not many people care about who created the standard. People do care about if they can implement it for free, and freely.
  • Thanks NOAA (Score:3, Insightful)

    by fbg111 ( 529550 ) on Thursday December 02, 2004 @03:21PM (#10977048)
    Congrats to the Slash community for making a difference and helping to set US Govt policy.

    And thanks to NOAA for being receptive to non-corporate opinions.

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...