Row Brews Over P2P Advertising 185
KennyMillar writes "BBC News Online is reporting that advertisers are starting to place ads on P2P networks, because they are so popular. But the owners of paid-for download services are accusing them of "providing 'oxygen' for companies that support illegal downloading.""
Router Host Blocking (Score:5, Interesting)
And you thought the trojans and spyware were bad.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:FP (Score:4, Interesting)
They do. It's called "product placement." E.g. ever notice how (almost) every computer ever shown in movie or TV show is a Mac?
Cheers,
Richard
"support illegal downloading' my ass (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't see anything illegal with that.
The last MP3 I got, was from a band sponsored website ' please download these and do what you want with them , share them.. burn them.. and if you like it come back and buy our album " Their music is ALSO copyrighted..
Enough with the 'its all copyright piracy' arguments already..
And this doesnt even touch the argument that even downloading 'restricted' media may actually be legal anyway in many cases, regardless of what the RIAA/MPAA thinks..
Obvious solution (Score:5, Interesting)
Why they should do this:
1. They're not restricted in terms of media. They can ship any audio, video, text, software, etc. media that the "viewers" can open.
2. They have a leg-up on illegal files because they can provide several stable download points (perhaps even using something like Akamai) that make their files faster to download.
3. There is no uplink lag
4. Uplink equipment cost is trivial by comparison with a broadcast or even cable station.
5. Ad revenues can be tied to more reliable measures of the viewer base than with broadcast or television. Neilsen would love this, as would advertisers.
6. You get to leap-frog HDTV and go to better digital formats long before HDTV telvisions have saturated the market.
There are more, subtler advantages, but I think any Hollywood MBA worth is diploma should be able to see them.
Pfff (Score:5, Interesting)
Not that I ever seen big companies put ads on P2P sites but if they do it is a sure sign that the music industry is now considered worthy of being ripped off by both consumers and other industries.
Lets face it. File sharing is good business. ISP's and telecoms make money off it. Recordable CD/DVD makers earn from every burned game/movie/cd. Burner makers profit. HD makers profit. Modem makers profit. Cable companies making the cables being rolled out to support our ever increasing data needs profit. Streetmakers profit because cables go underground.
Everybody is making money of filesharing except the music industry and now even totally unrelated industries are finding ways to make a buck out of it. It makes sense for a mobile phone company to advertise to music file sharers. Kids who don't spend money on overpriced cd's DO spend it on SMS packages.
Music industry wake up. Nobody likes you or your product. Get with the times or die. When the first cars arrived I bet the horse industry held similar pleas and nobody cared back then either.
Want to beat filesharing? I got a very simple solution. Get rid of pre-pressed cd's. Put 1 big central computer in each record labels basement wich contains all their songs ever recorded. Put smaller computers hooked up to the net in each point of sale. Give it a few terrabyte cache with the best sellers. Put up several terminals for people to browse the catalogs and sample songs. On request burn or upload selected songs to the buyer. Songs in the cache cost no extra bandwidth and HD space is cheap. Songs downloaded cost peanuts.
Every point of sale will have an infinite stock and be able to sell to every type of music lover. No longer problems with over or understocking. No stolen cd cases.
A simple business model and one the point of sales people love. They have been suggesting this for a long time and several have tried.
But the music industry doesn't want it. It prefers to cling on to the old model. Some horse cart makers turned to making horseless carriages and survived, some didn't. Do we really care about the losers?
Re:Router Host Blocking (Score:1, Interesting)
Bigger Mouth Than It Deserves? (Score:1, Interesting)
Another example of the entertainment industry having a bigger mouth than it deserves.
Just how the hell do they manage to shout so LOUDLY!! The games industry is worth ten times that of the movie industry, yet we never hear the gaming companies moning that P2P has taken away 85% of their business unlike the whinging pathetic record labels and movie houses
Screw em, the sooner the big 5 record labels and God knows how many hooooge movie companies go bust and leave room for the small inovative, value for money quality establishments the better.
Re:And you thought the trojans and spyware were ba (Score:4, Interesting)
Your printer is out of paper. A dialog pops up:
You open the system control folder. Before showing your files, it tells you:
You start writing a letter. A window opens:
Re:And you thought the trojans and spyware were ba (Score:3, Interesting)
A dialog will appear with a "Clink Here to Buy Ink" button, which oddly enough, takes you right to the Epson online store...
N.