John Gilmore interviewed by Greplaw 164
mpawlo writes "I have just published another one of those Greplaw interviews. This time, John Gilmore had the courtesy of answering a wide range of questions on various subjects such as terrorism and security, spam blocking, censorship, secret laws in airports and of course - sarongs. Gilmore starts: 'I'm a civil libertarian millionaire eccentric.' Enjoy!"
Judge Kafka? (Score:5, Interesting)
Is this the United States the Founding Fathers built, or Stalinism by way of Kafka?
ahem (Score:3, Interesting)
Created On: 03-Oct-03
Domain Name: GREPLAW.ORG
Created On: 11-Apr-2002
Re:And I thought I was alone... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:A wise man... (Score:3, Interesting)
For as much as some tend to complain about oppression in America, I'm not aware of such things actually happening."
Well if you are not aware of it then it probably never happened.
Here let me go the TheListOfPeopleWeKilledBecauseTheyDaredToQuestion
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:And I thought I was alone... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:And I thought I was alone... (Score:2, Interesting)
I don't want the police to start searching my house without a warrant, but I have no problem with the requirement of presenting identification when you are driving any vehicle under 25,000 pounds (standard license). To me, this is common sense.
Don't mean to harsh, but if someone wants to "live off the grid" and not have an id/dl then they shouldn't expect to share the same rights, since they are not willing to accept the same responsibility and accountability. Fine, live off the grid, walk or bike anywhere you want, you have that right. I just don't quite see how that extends to a drivers license that is not an ID.
Re:And I thought I was alone... (Score:3, Interesting)
We call those non-photo drivers licenses...you may still get one in Vermont and several Canadian provinces (New Brunswick and Quebec, perhaps a few others.) You may also get one with a bona fide relgious objection in many states, but as we know, that goes back and forth.
To this day, the most non-photo licenses out there are found in New Jersey, which only recently elminated the non-photo license (or is trying to.)
Re:And I thought I was alone... (Score:3, Interesting)
What I take from John Gilmore arguments, is that people should not be arbitrarily identified just because they are walking down the street or stepping on a plane. In a supposedly "free" societ you don't need a license to walk down a street, and you don't need a license to sit down on a plane and be flown somewhere. There isn't a good enough reason in a "free" society to just ask who you are if you are not doing anything wrong. Asking for ID as you pick up your ticket from the airport that you may of paid for earlier or something I think is reasonable so they can ensure that the ticket is given to the right person and not being stolen. Treating you as a suspected terrorist because you want to board a plane, that is not so reasonable in my books.
If you are driving a car and speeding possibly endangering other lives and the police stop you and want some identification then they seems perfectly reasonable to me. Using these forms of identification to find out who people are when they are not doing anything wrong I don't think is on. But these things are my opinions and are not facts.
Re:And I thought I was alone... (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course, it'll never happen. But it's a nice thought.
Re:And I thought I was alone... (Score:1, Interesting)
The funniest thing about the Libertarian party is that the talk out of both sides of their mouths. They claim they are not about survival of the fittest [lp.org]. They even say that they have a problem with their image [lp.org] that is being portrayed to the American public making them think that they are a bout survival-of-the-fittest. I wonder why [lp.org] that is?
P.S. If the Libertarians are against licensing drivers because it's not constitutional, let's go with what the Libertarian morons want, let's also abolish murder laws. There is no provision in the constitution providing safety. Besides He Who Would Sacrifice Freedom For Safety Deserves
Neither. So according to the Libertarians, if you feel that we need to have murder as a felony, then you deserve no liberty.