Microsoft Security Updates for Pirated Windows? 1096
zachlipton writes "DSL Reports has an interesting question posted: should users with pirated copies of Windows be allowed to download security updates, such as for Sasser? Apparently, without a valid CD key, users cannot download these updates. Do they get what they deserve, or should they be allowed these updates through Windows Update in order to reduce the impact of these worms on the rest of the net? Should security updates only for worms be made available to pirated users, or also updates for issues that while not posing a risk to other internet users, would open the pirate up to a security hole?"
Already a technical error... (Score:5, Informative)
Beta versions and corporate license CDs (Score:5, Informative)
Microsoft disables some CD keys already which are known to be pirated, but I wonder how many valid corporate group cd key installations there are which have been pirated. In that case, it really wouldn't be feasible for MS to disable that cd key, as it would disable that entire company, etc.
For a while... (Score:2, Informative)
It's probably in everyone's interest to give out patches to all, even those that Micro$oft knows are illegal copies, as it probably impacts the spread of viruses such as Sasser more than it does their pocketbook.
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:4, Informative)
XP and Longhorn-beta are special that way. Most other packages (2000 included) have generic MSDN keys.
Windows Xp Sp2 Latest Build (Score:4, Informative)
The keygen(a very very very popular one) generates product keys in the range 640-645. SP2 turns activation back on when it detects this.
xp updates (Score:3, Informative)
Not sure what's going on exactly... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Microsoft is not a charity (Score:1, Informative)
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:3, Informative)
Last time I had an MSDN sub, all the products that required activation off the shelf also required activation when installed from the MSDN CDs. That includes Windows XP, Office XP, Visio 2002 and Windows Server 2003. IIRC, even VS.Net requires activation.
Microsoft ships you all of thier patches with the MSDN update CDs too, so you can test your application and find out what thier latest patches broke and why.
As I said, I haven't had access to MSDN for a couple of years, but I imagine this would still be the case.
Soko
Re:Not sure what's going on exactly... (Score:3, Informative)
I had to do this just a couple hours ago -- on my Tektronix scope (that happens to run Win2k).
Re:Hey lets support the thieves! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Updates (Score:5, Informative)
Even better than that is "Reset5". Updates are allowed for unactivated XP installs that are still in the first 30 days. Reset5 is a little service that runs at startup and magically keeps that 30 day grace period timer set at 30 days. This is actually more than just a handy tool for pirates. I personally use it on my legitimate copy of XP Pro because the stupid piece of crap DE-ACTIVATES ITSELF if I change more than a couple pieces of hardware (something I do with remarkable frequency).
Re:Not sure what's going on exactly... (Score:5, Informative)
FCKGW-... being they key that was commonly distributed with the first major pirate release of XP (Devil's own).
Re:Windows Xp Sp2 Latest Build (Score:2, Informative)
Don't use Windows Update (Score:4, Informative)
Or better yet, use the Microsoft Security Baseline Analyzer Tool [microsoft.com] which includes Hfnetchk.exe.
Windows Update actually deletes downloaded updates once they're installed. You can try to retrieve them before they're installed. But it's easier to just download them from the download center. That way you can qchain 'em if you do a reinstall.
They CAN download security updates (Score:2, Informative)
Google, anyone? (Score:5, Informative)
"I'm Feeling Lucky", even.
Re:Read carefully (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Tricky situation... (Score:0, Informative)
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:3, Informative)
Not true for VS.NET. Not for VS.NET 2002 and VS.NET 2003 at least...
Re:What do you expect? (Score:3, Informative)
Since they started distributing software that interferes with the stability of everyone else's networks, of course.
Re:Just pirate the patches (Score:2, Informative)
Pirate doesn't equal stupid, it just equals "too cheap to buy a version of Windows". As other posters have stated: Microsoft owes *a lot* to pirates. Imagine what would have happened if Windows 95 would have had "real" copy protection. The migration would have happened a lot slower. Heck, I only "upgraded" to Windows 95 in 97. From OS/2 that is. I loved OS/2. *sniff*
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:5, Informative)
Funny thing about that: although Microsoft claims that they will allow 2 (or 3??) automatic registrations over the 'net without calling, I have found that not to be the case. Since XP was released, reg process for win2k or office2k always reports server down or too busy and then I must call. I haven't gotten any flack from the flunkies passing out reg numbers, but the 1/2 hour wasted is a pain. Microsoft has forced me to pirate a copy of their software to use valid licenses.
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:1, Informative)
Upgrade works OK for pirated WinXP (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Beta versions and corporate license CDs (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:2, Informative)
The few pirates I know are all running Advanced Server and Datacenter when they feel like running Windows.
This is False Information (Score:3, Informative)
Actually, most software in Asia *is* pirated. (Score:5, Informative)
Who modded this flamebait tripe as "insightful"?
Perhaps you were ignorant of the fact, but:
- according to the Business Software Alliance [bsa.org].Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:3, Informative)
FrontPage Professional 2003
Office 2000 Premium (Brazil & Chinese Versions)
Office 2003 Proofing Tools
Office Professional Enterprise Edition 2003
Office XP Suite (Retail)
OneNote 2003
Project Professional 2002
Project Professional 2003
Project Standard 2003
Publisher 2002
Publisher 2003
Small Business Server 2003
Visio 2002 Professional
Visio 2002 Professional (Chinese Versions)
Visio Professional 2003
Windows "Longhorn" Client Preview
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition (64 bit)
Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
Windows Server 2003 Web Edition
Windows XP Home Edition (Retail, MSDN)
Windows XP Media Center Edition
Windows XP Professional (64 bit)
Windows XP Professional (Retail, MSDN)
Windows XP Tablet PC Edition MSDN
BTW - retail just means you can use the product for real, and not just for test purposes (this comes with the MSDN universal licence). You are limited to an initial 10 installations (but you don't have to activate every install - 60 days for OS and 50 users for office products). If you use up your 10 uses you can get more activations (I believe - I've not actually tried this).
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Yes we should all pay for this too (Score:4, Informative)
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:5, Informative)
I've seen articles where they interviewed shop owners, and they just didn't understand what the problem was. They considered the *DISCS* to be the product, not the content, and said they didn't understand, they bought the discs for x, they sell them for x*2, they're doing nothing wrong, what's the problem?
Another friend said it's about the same in Russia, though less open. For about $15, you can buy a CD pack containing Windows, Office, and a selection of games and stuff. Even when someone has the legitimate software, they sometimes use the "pirate pack" because the pirates take the time to have the properly localized versions of everything already set up. I think the Russians know that what they're doing isn't considered "right" though.
Certainly there are big pirating operations everywhere, but in some countries, pirating is the norm, and nobody thinks twice about it.
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:2, Informative)
a java version of the proggie this year (IRPF2004). Runs on OsX, Solaris, Linux, anywhere
that the sun JDK runs. Used it this year and it is very nice. Check it in 2005.
cheers.
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:3, Informative)
However, there is a limit to the number of different/reconfigured PC's you can install to using the provided key, and yes tracking that can be a pain in the ass. I've worked on projects where we needed to test on lots of PC's over a multiple month period, and we ended up having to basically make a pool of keys from multiple subscriptions so that people with more extreme requirements (like the device driver guys) wouldn't run out of activations.
Yes, we could have constantly reinstalled without activating or kept calling MS tech support, but both of those also qualify as a pain in the ass in my book.
Suck your [microsoft.com] own [extremetech.com] smoke [google.com].
Re:Hey lets support the thieves! (Score:5, Informative)
My textbook says, "In one form of dumping, a company sells products abroad at prices below its cost of production. In another, a company exports a large quantity of a product at a lower price than the same product in the home market and drives down the price of the domestic product." (Contemporary Business, 11e). Dumping is an illegal pratice. Of course, that's never stopped Microsoft before. They come from the school that believes laws are just "guidlines" and use their huge cash reserves to pay off any indiscretions.
Re:Read carefully (Score:2, Informative)
So right off the bat the EULA is lying. You already have the right to install and use your copy of the software; Microsoft can't grant you what you already have. Now, nothing says you can't give up this right in a binding contract, so MS would have to successfully argue before a judge that the EULA is a binding contract in order to hold you to its terms.
Fat chance, says I. I can think of a couple of defences right off the bat: coercion (if I don't want to agree to the EULA but exercise my statutory right anyway, the software gives me no means to do so), no consideration (MS doesn't give me anything in exchange for agreeing to its terms), and some take on first-sale doctrine (I bought my copy from a third party, not MS; MS shouldn't get to impose additional terms on me after a sale it wasn't even involved in).
MS has never even taken an end-user to court to attempt to enforce its terms, either, to my knowledge. They came up with product activation instead to act as their own judge.
Two notes: this scenario wouldn't apply to commercial use of the software, especially for firms that sign license agreements before any copies of software change hands; and this assumes you could afford to fight off the MS-megabuck lawyers in the first place.
(Insert usual IANAL disclaimer here.)
Re:I can't believe this question even deserves... (Score:4, Informative)
That isn't a point of contention, read at *least* the summary before going off the handle. This is not about security updates for the benefit of the pirate end user, but the impact of having pirate end users incapable of getting security updates propogating worms that make the rest of the good community suffer.
On remote-exploit security updates, now that I see this circumstance, I think they should apply no matter what. Now feature enhancements and reliability fixes for the end user, those should be denied. Those fixes not being applied are far more annoying to the typical end user anyway, so MS would improve the community by fixing even the pirate systems in the ways that impact the community, but keep things hard for the pirate users by leaving their system extra buggy (even above and beyond the normal Windows experience).
me too (Score:5, Informative)
XVJW8-DB93F-2R2XD-XGB3D-3788D
To illustrate how crap things have become with preinstalled doze, my Sony didn't even come with a CD!
Re:What about MSDN windows (Score:4, Informative)
Okay, here, I'll slow it down a bit for those that don't grok the problems here...
Say I want to test a piece of software with 10 PC's simultaneously for 3 months without reformatting them. That's fine by the license - just activate each and go for it.
Now say I get two new machines in with completely different hardware that is supposedly having an incompatibility with the product. I remove XP on two of the old machines that have proven to work well with the product and do a format, then send them off to IT to be used for whatever. The licensed software has been removed - you'd think one could install it on the two new machines now and run for three more months without problems, yes? No, because of the stupid activation limitations. That's scenario 1.
Now, howabout a situation where there are 2 developers, each with his own MSDN license. Both are working on a single project, but their testing needs are different. Developer A needs to do a lot of different OS/configuration testing, but the actual hardware doesn't matter that much - let's say he's the apps guy. Developer B needs to test on every variation of hardware he can possibly get his hands on, because he's the driver guy working on a USB device. Because of the large variety of USB implementations out there (many of which are flawed in their own special way), he really needs to do hard-core, long term testing on several different machines. So, Developer A and Developer B pool their resources - both are working on the same project within a single room, so it makes sense that they should be able to do that. A gets 5 machines, B gets 15.
Now, combine the two situations and add more developers over a longer period of time. What you have now is a clusterfuck. Despite the fact that your team has legitimately purchased enough licenses to run on all the machines they have at any one time, you now have a definite possibility of a license shortage and you're forced to keep a list of all of the developer keys with tallies on how many times each has been used so you'll have known keys available when it comes time to remove old/broken/obsoleted test machines and bring in new ones.
Now, to add another issue in the mix - if you renew your subscription, you keep the same key and don't get additional reinstalls. So, either you beg your representative to refresh your key or give you a new one, or you're even more limited on test machines unless you cancel your MSDN subscription and buy a new one - getting 10 more installs in the process.
Got it?
Re:Hey lets support the thieves! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:And the truth comes out on Slashdot... (Score:2, Informative)
Yeah, like that [computerworld.com] hasn't [computerworld.com] happened [stargeek.com] several [netcraft.com] times [securitypipeline.com] already [macobserver.com].
p
Re:Yes we should all pay for this too (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Yes we should all pay for this too (Score:4, Informative)
Re: prices below its cost of production (Score:1, Informative)
Software created (lets just say once) and then put into production - millions of CDs are stamped with the SAME code!!
Therefore cost of production is eXtremely LOW!!
-
I have a
Re:Actually, most software in Asia *is* pirated. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Yes we should all pay for this too (Score:2, Informative)
You are actually wrong about this. You don't buy a copy of Windows. You buy the media and manual, and pay for the rights to use Windows (ie. LICENSE). So you don't actually own it to sell. Non-transferable rights are everywhere to be seen, and enforced many times over on different courts all around the world.
If you don't agree with the EULA, you still can't resell it. You can, however, return it for a full refund. I know of many people who did this: got a computer with windows, and returned the windows license to Microsoft (or an authorized office) for a full refund. This is, so far, the only legal alternative. If someone know of any court rulling otherwise, I would be happy to receive a link to the rulling.
Unless someone whats to take the pain to go to court, and prove that this is wrong, this is how it works.
Re:Actually, most software in Asia *is* pirated. (Score:3, Informative)
What planet are you reading from?
In order to lose $50 million, you have to actually *have* that $50 million, or some way of obtaining it. If you stop those 10k people from pirating that $5k piece of software, you don't get $50 million from it. You get 10k fewer people using the software. It's not the same thing as losing, or gaining, $50 million in sales.
This simple fact of arithmetic has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with whether you believe software piracy is right, wrong, or purple.
Great and all (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Hey lets support the thieves! (Score:3, Informative)