New RFC Considers .sex TLD Dangerous 421
netcentric writes "A post on CircleID has reported about an RFC prepared by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd and Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com's Washington D.C. correspondent, analyzing proposals from various parties to mandate the use of special top level domain names (such as .sex or .xxx) or an IP address bit to flag 'adult' or 'unsafe' material or the like. The analysis explains why these ideas are dangerous and ill considered from legal, philosophical, and technical points of view. Here is the post to this report on CircleID along with some commentaries and link to the entire RFC 3675."
I have a porn RFC (Score:0, Funny)
Lieberman (Score:5, Funny)
Adult Bit and Evil bit? (Score:5, Funny)
Adult bit? Don't the have that already? (Score:5, Funny)
hahah (Score:5, Funny)
Lets just say I should hope so
Haven't been with her yet (Score:2, Funny)
Does she have the clap or what?
Amazon.sex (Score:5, Funny)
tomshardware.sex
slashdot.sex
irs.sex
gateway.sex
Internet's about to get real interesting.
Thread title (Score:5, Funny)
Now _that_ would be a dangerous series of websites.
wbs.
Re:hahah (Score:4, Funny)
I think maybe I'll get a
Cheers.
Re:"If he committed no crime in his home country" (Score:0, Funny)
Obligatory Scrubs Quote (Score:5, Funny)
Re:RTFA (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Obligatory Scrubs Quote (Score:2, Funny)
why don't you people use hyperlinking? I had to cut and paste that into my address bar.
Slippery slope (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, yes you were all happy when the GOTO [acm.org] was considered harmful. But it didn't stop there. Oh no. I warned you, I did.
And now see where it's led? Sex considered harmful!
Bring back the GOTO before it is too late!
Yes! (Score:5, Funny)
Preferably something easy to type with one hand.
Re:Don't forget (Score:3, Funny)
google.sex
But it can be made safe! (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Adult Bit and Evil bit? (Score:5, Funny)
ddd? (Score:4, Funny)
that will be fun.
Everyone says they hate sex (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I've never thought this was a good idea... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Amazon.sex (Score:2, Funny)
Of course it's a good idea! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:RTFA (Score:3, Funny)
After all, a person who doesn't have time to RTFA isn't going to take the time to watch their kids, either.
I'd be more insightful, but I think my puppy is eating my couch.
Re:ddd? (Score:3, Funny)
Pornography is a very powerful force.
I really wish someone could explain exactly what this powerful force is capable of.
Besides boosting the paper tissue industry.
Re:RTFA (Score:3, Funny)
Re:RTFA (Score:3, Funny)
Your message got cut by my censorship filter on the "boob" in your name, Buck-a-boob-ob.
So much for content control...
Re:I've never thought this was a good idea... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Amazon.sex (Score:3, Funny)
Error 404--Not Found
From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1:
10.4.5 404 Not Found
The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or permanent, but naturally we hope it's not.
If the server does not wish to make this information available to the client, or if the client is a prude, the status code 403 (Forbidden) can be used instead. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address. This may mean the resource really just wants you to STOP CALLING. Get the hint and try another different resource, or resolve your issue using any number of 'offline' methods.
Re:ddd? (Score:4, Funny)
Sex dangerous? (Score:3, Funny)
Some UK adverts (Score:5, Funny)
Ad #1 [trojangames.co.uk] Ad #2 [trojangames.co.uk] Ad #3 [trojangames.co.uk]