Viet Dinh Defends The Patriot Act 817
Grrr writes "Wired News has posted an interview with Viet Dinh, who worked on the PATRIOT Act for the Justice Department. In the past he said, "Security without liberty - it's not an America I would want to live in." And also, in this interview, "I think right now at this time and this place the greatest threat to American liberty comes from al-Qaida and their sympathizers rather than from the men and women of law enforcement and national security who seek to defend America and her people against that threat." Several of his replies are (predictably / necessarily / discouragingly) less than direct."
FBI is DROWNING in information (Score:1, Informative)
Wonderful---more P.R. bullcrap from the Government (Score:5, Informative)
The only reason they affect liberties is because Congress passes things like the Patriot Act. Otherwise, all they affect is safety.
Terrorists affect SAFETY, Congress affects LIBERTY. Get it straight, and we can all stop falling for this crap coming from Washington. If they said these terrorist groups were the greatest threat to our safety, then I'd buy it. But they are, however, NOT a threat to our liberty.
The Patriot Act is the threat to our liberty, effectively nullifying the Bill of Rights when it comes to searches and siezures, and the right to a FAIR and SPEEDY trial.
Government disheartens me. So do the people who buy crap like this from them and cannot draw the distinction for themselves. Just my (flaming) two cents.
This isn't supposed to be flamebait, but mod it as such if you think it is.
BULLSHIT! (Score:5, Informative)
MODS, please. Pay attention. (Score:1, Informative)
Then, when you've cast a bit of doubt, check poster's history. Note that he posts early, NEVER posts anything other than regurgitated obvious stuff, posts similar headlines EVERY time... Note that many people (including yours truly, I admit) have outed the guy for misrepresenting himself as such things as professor at a nonexistent school, professor at a community college,professional programmer, etc. Note that he posts at -1 most of the time, because he's a known troll and karmawhore.
See, I wouldn't normally feel the necessity to out every karmawhore on Slashdot - but you MODs keep falling down on your duties.
It's not "+1, Informative" if it's wrong; it's not "+1, Insightful" if it's obvious. If you can't tell, don't mod it either.
Thanks.
Re:Asking a Vietnam refugee... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The greatest threat to my liberty... (Score:5, Informative)
Basically, what I'm saying is that neither party has been particularly good on matters of personal liberties and the right to privacy. The Republicans are just a lot more blatant about their intentions than the Democrats. And the Republicans tend to go a little farther and push a little harder than the Democrats do.
Just keeping this debate honest...
For future reference (Score:3, Informative)
Re:BZZZZZZT! WRONG! (Score:2, Informative)
Article XVI.
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.
And that my friends, is why the 16th amendment is the most hated. The standing army thing is probably justified under the elastic clause. You can look that one up
Re:Read the Patriot Act (Score:3, Informative)
If you want to see balanced criticism of the Patriot Act based on what it actually says, read this series [msn.com] in Slate.
About the Patriot Act,
From a Clifford May [townhall.com] columnRe:Read the Patriot Act (Score:3, Informative)
One of the U.S. citizens being held indefinitely without trial is named Jose Padilla. He was arrested in Chicago [cato.org] at the airport, not on a foreign battlefield! The other one is named Yaser Hamdi, and he might have been trying to kill American soldiers, but we don't really know, since he wasn't captured by U.S. forces. He was handed over to them by an Afghan warlord [philpotonpolitics.com] working with the U.S. No U.S. soldiers saw him captured and they had to take the Afghan's word for what he was doing.
I could find links to wiretap changes, but I'm feeling lazy. In any case you seem to have had a few misunderstandings of your own--ones that can easily be corrected with 5 minutes of Googling.
Re:His name is Viet Dinh (Score:3, Informative)
RTFA. He came at the age of 7. (How many Vietnamese Americans were there before the 1970s?)
Offtopic, but .... (Score:3, Informative)
HR 163 http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:H.
S 89 http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:S.
Pretty much, if you are persuiing higher education, that no longer matters, and you can still get drafted. Also, if I read it correctly, it states that everyone HAS to mandatorily serve under military service.
I cannot stand the nazi Bush regime, and their total disregard for our status as human beings.
Re:The greatest threat (Score:3, Informative)
Re:The greatest threat to my liberty... (Score:4, Informative)
Provide one with a sensible, reasonable platform that doesn't try to upset the applecart all at once and alienate every damn person on the planet, and I'll consider it.
I like the Libertarians as a general rule, except they can't ever agree on anything, except in the most general terms. The Libertarian convention is some of the best entertainment ever. Sorry, too fragmented to ever serve as anything but an example.
The Reform Party - uh. no. never. Ross Perot? C'mon guys. Great ideas focused solely on govermental reform and nothing else.
Greens - Nope. Not ever. Too far left.
Constitution Party - Too much Bible thumping. "Return
I'd feel like I was wasting my vote if I DID vote for any of those.
Re:I doubt it (Score:3, Informative)
just remember one simple fact: Hitler was elected.
That is categorically untrue. Read Steve Kangas' discussion of this common misconception at http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-hitlerdemo.htm [huppi.com]
Re:the most disturbing part of the interview... (Score:4, Informative)
I wish I had time to do it for you myself, but here's a pretty good analysis of the USA PATRIOT act and why it's bad:
http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/usapatriot [epic.org]
Physical violence against citizens in the most blatant way, murder, is preventable.
Wrong. The only way that would be possible would be for each and every person in the US to have an armed guard in their company 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year. Life is dangerous, that's a fact of life. I've said it before, and I'll say it again.. live long enough, you die. Every time, no exceptions.
Each one of those twenty hijackers made a conscious effort. America did not deserve it. not one person who died deserved it.
No argument there. I'm a firefighter, so 343 of my brothers died on 9/11 as a result. I definitely feel the pain of what happened. But if we start sacrificing our civil liberties in the name of psuedo-safety in the aftermath of 9/11, then those brave men and women died in vain, and there memories are tarnished forevermore.
And it could have been prevented had a decent enough intelligence effort been put forth.
That's debatable. The intelligence we DID have wasn't acted on appropriately. Would more intelligence have really helped?
If the government did NOT put forth efforts to protect us, it would be abdicating its duty.
No, no, no. Nobody has any obligation to protect me (or you) but myself (or yourself). It's a simple concept called personal responsibility, and it used to be considered a basic principle in this country. The government is not a full-time nanny who can watch over each and every one of us around the clock.
The thing is, no matter how careful you are, bad things can still happen. That sucks, but it's life. How many of you really thought you were going to live forever, anyway? But while you are living, you should be able to live with Freedom and Liberty, as a free man, according to the principles defined in the Constitution.
10/26/2001 - a date which will live in infamy (Score:2, Informative)
On October 26th - a date which will live in infamy - the President signed the USA/PATRIOT act, officially known as HR 3162. And you should well note that, according to Representative Ron Paul (R) of Texas - as reported on November 9th by Kelly O'Meara of the Washington Times' Insight Magazine - the bill had not even been printed and members of the House could not read it before they were compelled to vote on it. O'Meara wrote, "Meanwhile, efforts to obtain copies of the new bill were stonewalled even by the committee that wrote it." Most of its provisions have nothing to do with fighting terrorism. Under this so-called anti-terrorist measure:
terrorist threat: the numbers (Score:5, Informative)
The 2001 attack was the big exception: 3000 Americans were killed that year on US soil.
However, to put this in context, about 40,000 Americans are killed every year in auto accidents.
So this is what we're sacrificing liberty for: a phenomenon that is typically less than 0.1% of the threat from auto accidents, and didn't evern break 10% in the worst year ever.
Re:Your fellow Americans... (Score:3, Informative)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2071496.stm
Re:The problems with the Patriot Act.... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:The greatest threat to my liberty... (Score:3, Informative)
Constitution Party - Too much Bible thumping. "Return ... our law to it's Biblical foundation". Not only no, but hell no. It's the Taliban all over again.
You are too funny. Here are some quotes from the Constitutionalist Party platform.
Yep, sounds just like the Taliban.
Re:The greatest threat to my liberty... (Score:4, Informative)
Constitution Party != Constitutionalist Party
Do a little googling on the two.
Re:The greatest threat to my liberty... (Score:3, Informative)