Google Asks Booble To Cease And Desist 445
cosmodemonic writes "The folks at Search Engine Journal have the low-down on a cease and desist order that Google has sent to the porn search engine/Google parody Booble. It seems that, although Booble is claiming to be a parody (which is protected under law), Google is flexing its muscle because of the marketability of the parody." Search Engine Journal makes the reasonable suggestion: "Recent rulings may favor Google in the case, since Booble may be trying to profit from the marketability of the parody."
Can't Beat 'em, don't wanna buy them... (Score:5, Funny)
If this is the law now... (Score:5, Funny)
Shame, I liked Even Worse a lot when I was a boy...
Re:Can't Beat 'em, don't wanna buy them... (Score:5, Funny)
Bummer. (Score:5, Funny)
I'm feeling Lucky (Score:5, Funny)
No permanent slashdot link? (Score:5, Funny)
heh (Score:5, Funny)
New user to booble (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I hope they lose (Score:2, Funny)
Step away from the computer...
Re:I'm feeling Lucky (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Bummer. (Score:0, Funny)
Ooooh, NO! Google just became big/fat enough... (Score:1, Funny)
Dear Google (Score:1, Funny)
If this is about your own, you know, "inadequacies", you don't need to worry, I'll still love you, but you need to understand, I really like porn!
I think they're on solid ground here. (Score:5, Funny)
IWTKAL, but I think Booble is on pretty solid ground here. This is clearly, clearly a parody site (in fact, it's pretty bad parody if you ask me) and nowhere near functional.
I mean geez, a porn search engine that doesn't return any hits for "Jenna Haze," "Cherry Rain," or "Belladonna" is a long way from "marketable."
We put the Spring in Springfield (Score:4, Funny)
We just learned this place existed...
The Simpsons has an answer for everything
Re:Can't Beat 'em, don't wanna buy them... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Can't Beat 'em, don't wanna buy them... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Good riddance anyway (Score:5, Funny)
Why?
Afraid he might get ideas?
Re:Come on now... (Score:3, Funny)
Many poor countries simply ignore patents and copyrights. Why? Their economies are usually heavy on agriculture, natural resources or low-tech manufacturing, and not so much in knowledge industries. There simply isn't enough supply to warrant having the laws, and in many countries the demand is low enough that it is simply not worthwhile for first world firms to push the issue too hard.
There is one important caveat to this: sometimes demand for some patented product does skyrocket for whatever reason. One case in point is with AIDS drugs: there is an AIDS epidemic right now in Africa. Don't underestimate how bad it is: the word epidemic is so over used, I don't think it properly describes how widespread AIDS is in some countries. The first world manufacturers only wanted to sell at ridiculously high prices, considering how poor these countries are. Their insistance became moot when an Indian drug manufacturer agreed to sell AIDS drugs closer to the actual cost of manufacturing. The first world firms have since softened their position.
The situation may change as poor countries develop, but then it will probably happen only because they will have a domestic industry to protect (think India in 20 years).
They're just sore 'cause (Score:0, Funny)
Re:I hope they lose (Score:1, Funny)
Re:If this is the law now... (Score:5, Funny)
Q: Hey Al!!!!! What do u think about Napster? I just want to know if you approve.
A: I have very mixed feelings about it. On one hand, I'm concerned that the rampant downloading of my copyright-protected material over the Internet is severely eating into my album sales and having a decidedly adverse effect on my career. On the other hand, I can get all the Metallica songs I want for FREE! WOW!!!!!
Re:Good riddance anyway (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Whatever you do (Score:1, Funny)
Hermaphoride pr0n followed by shower...
Cold water, eh?
Re:Good riddance anyway (Score:1, Funny)
Miconi! In my office! NOW!
Re:No permanent slashdot link? (Score:3, Funny)
is it really a search engine (Score:3, Funny)
However, the "I am feeling lucky" button changes. Sometimes it says "I am feeling lucky", sometimes it says "I am feeling playful", and sometimes it says "I am feeling nostalgic". Each of these buttons takes you to a different adult site.
So, booble is more of a portal than a search engine.
Now, we know that we can have software called "Firebird" and "Thunderbird" without the car industry dropping engine blocks on us. However, I think "portal" and "search engine" are close enough, in the eyes of the courts and lawyers, for this to be trademark infringement (after all, they thought the Phoenix browser infringed on Phoenix BIOS!)
Re:Booble Replies (Score:3, Funny)
If by "entirely different" they mean "80% identical", then I guess they have a point...
?oo?le.com
Google, say it isn't so! (Score:4, Funny)
Is someone _really_ going to mistake the booble site for google? C'mon, it's pretty obvious that it's not google. I guess they're pissed that booble knocked off the look of the google page or something. But then they should just have booble chagne it so it's obviously different. Taking down the site name is just too much... I've always though booble was kinda funny
I guess google is just trying to protect their trademark or something, but really... is it that confusing?
I guess nobody's told Yahoo about yourmom.com yet... that site is organize pretty much like yahoo.com... they even mimic the logo. Hmmm, hope yahoo doesn't read slashdot, cuz I may have just alerted them... dammit!