Pop-Up Ads Lead to Consumer Revolt, Ad-Blocking 697
securitas writes "The New York Times' Saul Hansell reports on pop-up advertising and the consumer backlash against intrusive advertising. It's worth noting that pop-ups and pop-unders are the most effective, lucrative and annoying online advertising form. The article discusses the boom in ad-blocker software, with AOL, Yahoo and Google getting into the game. Microsoft says that it will include pop-up blocking in IE when it releases WinXP SP2. According to one pop-under ad agency, 20%-25% percent of Web users have pop-up blocking enabled, double the rate of a year ago - Earthlink's numbers bear that out, with 1 million of its 5 million customers using its ad-blocking software 18 months after release. DoubleClick says that it is 'developing technology that will enable pop-up ads to evade the blocking software.' Why isn't that surprising?"
Poor Windows XP users... (Score:3, Funny)
That is innovation for ya
You're Stealing the Internet! (Score:3, Funny)
You are all just a bunch of sick criminals.
--
Jamie Kellner
Chairman and CEO of Turner Broadcasting
I have a crazy idea.. (Score:5, Funny)
Why is this so hard? Google's apparently doing a pretty good job of it-- Sure you need a lot more customers, but for the love of frank, I don't need any goddamned spy cameras, I don't have a babysitter or a cheating spouse, or for that matter a misbehaving dog.
Microsoft says that it will include... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I have a crazy idea.. (Score:5, Funny)
How do you know unless you have the spy camera?? There could be a babysitter in your house right now without your knowing!
Bring it on! (Score:3, Funny)
Bring it on Doubleclick! It'll be a fucking frosty day in hell when I ever buy anything from any company that advertises with you. Doubleclick will do all of that work only to have companies that make pop-up blocking software figure out a way to block the new kind of pop-up ads and shut them down again. The problem is that as long as even 0.0001% of users are stupid enough to click the pop-ups and actually buy something there will always be scum sucking, bottom feeding companies that will do what Doubleclick does. It's just like the spam problem. All of us pay because of the few rocket scientists who buy things that are advertised via pop-ups and spam. I just hope these tools don't reproduce, but we all know they will. In fact, they are the type that tend to reproduce most.
"Hey, what the hell Bobby Sue, let's have another 13 kids we can't afford to feed. Hey, Bobby Sue, lookie here, it says here in my e-lectronic mail that they've get these new fangeled pills that can enlarge my penis. Heeeee hah! I'm saving this here message and if I can't find these babies at Wal-Mart then I'll just click this here website and buy these puppies. Your 4 credit cards aren't still maxed out is they Bobby Sue?"
Re:Does advertising have to be annoying? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:But look how FEW people few use it ... (Score:4, Funny)
Do you drive?
Re:Feh (Score:3, Funny)
Pity poor guy (Score:2, Funny)
> widely used, will definitely cut into my
> income," said William Smith, who runs 40
> Web sites from Winnipeg, Manitoba.
> "A guy has to make money," he said.
"These bank vaults, as they become too widely used, will definitely cut into my income," said Smilliam With, bank robber and safecracker. "A guy has to make money," he said.
Re:Does advertising have to be annoying? (Score:4, Funny)
Lucrative? (Score:2, Funny)
Lucrative? That's because people were accidentally clicking on the ad in their haste to hit the close button.
Chip H.