DeCSS: Jon Johansen Retrial Begins 559
JPMH writes "Jon Johansen is back on trial for DeCSS. Despite the acquittal back in January, the Norwegian Economic Crime Unit (OKOKRIM) is allowed to bring his case back before an enlarged panel of judges. The retrial begins today."
Most worrying bit:: (Score:5, Interesting)
This is really not good for peoples civil liberties at all - it sucks! This will mean lots of people will get sued potenially.
Ok, that really sucks (Score:-1, Interesting)
Re:Most worrying bit:: (Score:5, Interesting)
If you purchase something, and you own it, can the company who created it, but who no longer owns it, put restrictions on the manner in which it can be used?
For my most chafing U.S. example, it is illegal to copy and distribute a movie. But, legally, do you *have* to watch the FBI warning at the beginning of the movie?
If you ask me, there should be no point in a DVD at which you cannot skip ahead, fast forward, or hit menu to get out of the current section of the disc.
~Wx
Re:Most worrying bit:: (Score:2, Interesting)
I hope someone with a brain throws this out the moment it reaches that point. This whole thing is a crock -- it's being done only to suppress fair use rights and the like. It's just like the SCO suit -- they're trying to geta nice big wave of FUD going, and I'm sure that they know it.
What's next -- a SCO-style marathon of going after blue-haired grannies who want to watch DVDs on their Linux-based PVR system set up by their loving children?
Re-trial is common when a precedent is being set (Score:5, Interesting)
Simon
It's Norweigan Law (Score:5, Interesting)
this is misleading.
according to the complaint [ipjustice.org] filed against him he was charged with vilolating section 145.2 of the Norweigan criminal statute "which outlaws bypassing technological restrictions to access data that one is not entitled to access."
according to the criminal complaint he was charged with accessing the master key, the master key list, as well as the contents of a protected disk.
the question is whether the master key, and the master key list, which are intentionally encrypted, can be considered as data he is not "entitled to access."
to say he is being prosecuted for "accessing his own property" is simply shrill hyperbole.
despite the confidence expressed by his lawyer, his case is not so clear cut.
Jon is now 18 years old (Score:5, Interesting)
I was still sitting on legos and eating giant bowls of Sugar Crisp in front of the Smurfs when I was 15.
When will we see the takedown of fair use in this country?
OT Question: Don't the major linux players (IBM, RedHat, um.. Dell ect.) distribute some sort of linux DeCSS DVD player? Why are they not being hunted down and sued by the MPAA?
Re:Most worrying bit:: (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Most worrying bit:: (Score:5, Interesting)
I wish him luck in the trial, and boy do I think he's going to need it now.
Accessing data to which he was not entitled (Score:4, Interesting)
So it should boil down to whether people are entitled to access data on DVDs for which they paid fair and square. Why do we pay $25/DVD if it isn't for the right to access the data on them?
Re:What is this about ? (Score:3, Interesting)
sound like good reasons to me.
Re:Ok, that really sucks (Score:3, Interesting)
In theory, yes that could happen. In reality, the DA would simply try to nail you on some bullshit charge that can carry a hefty penalty. e.g. Al Capone was nailed on tax evasion after the various agencies were continually unable to prove his involvement in serious crimes.
Re:What is this about ? (Score:3, Interesting)
Prosecutor doesn't know algorithms (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article
If you scroll a little down you'll find:
According to newspaper VG's web site, the
technical nature of the case led to judge Wenche
Skjaeggestad asking the prosecutor to explain the
meaning of the central term 'algorithm' (a
computational procedure applied to solve a
problem), a request eventually satisfied by one
of the expert assessors.
Now, who could expect the prosecutor to actually understand what it is he's beeing charged of? That would just be silly..
Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Prosecutor doesn't know algorithms (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:What is this about ? (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd say watergate , Iran / contra not to mention quantanamo are pretty bad casses of government abuse myself, but then that's probably because I'm not as free as Americans and I've probably been indoctrinated by my evil government to think that.
Keep tossing until something sticks (Score:0, Interesting)
I'm glad I live in the USA where that cant happen.. um errr unless enough evidence is found to reopen the case.. or its for 'national security reasons' or or or...
Re:Love that US Constitution!! (Score:2, Interesting)
This is (unfortunately) true in Civil matters only between two parties (e.g. lawsuit), where the damages are only monetary, not incarceration. Multiple motions and appeals occur in criminal cases if the defendant is found guilty. Once the defendant is acquitted (innocent) of the charges, the appeals etc. cease.
Re:Ok, that really sucks (Score:3, Interesting)
The really bad principle in this (Score:4, Interesting)
Anybody who has been engaged in a long drawn out legal case with many hearings knows that it is one of the worst things that can happen to anybody, and even if one is eventually successful it may take years to recover. What is happening in Guantanamo Bay is deplorable, but surely what is happening in this case is deplorable on a smaller scale. To me, both cases are like prosecuting a small scale cannabis seller because the guy running the big operation selling crack is too powerful and the police badly need a drugs bust for the statistics.