RIAA Threatens 15-Year-Old 1016
MunchMunch writes "It looks like the RIAA is still going after teenagers--this time, 15-year old Megan Dickinson was caught sharing 1,100 files. At the maximum statutory damages for copyright infringement, this makes Megan's liability at least $825,000, at most a mere $165,000,000. Naturally, the RIAA benevolently offered a $3,500 settlement to avoid these moderate, legally sanctioned damages. As we can hardly forget, the RIAA has already used this technique to settle with a 12 year old. Megan's unsurprising take: 'Yeah, it seems ridiculous.'"
Re:What's stopping (Score:2, Funny)
Why don't these people fight? (Score:4, Funny)
Good idea? (Score:4, Funny)
RIAA's Day-after Thanksgiving sale already? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Assassination? (Score:5, Funny)
Only in America. Land of the Free, Home of the Brave.
Re:I'm not afraid of you! (Score:1, Funny)
Better yet, I'll sell you the same 100 songs for 50 cents each - that's only $500.
Re:Nothing better to do (Score:5, Funny)
If you have sediment in your piss, I think you have bigger problems than paying too much for your CDs.
Re:1100 FILES??? (Score:3, Funny)
On second thought, NOPE, I have no music at ALL! Nope, I'm entirely pirate music free! You happy RIAA lawyers have a great day and thanks for keeping me honest.
Re:uh (Score:2, Funny)
Now, if a 30 year old woman has a nudie pic of a 15 year old boy, *then* I'd have issues.
"Stealing" vs. "copyright infringement" aside, I agree that she's probably doing something illegal, but I still think the RIAA are assholes, and I continue to boycott them in the hopes that they and their whole system of music distribution die a nasty, flaming death.
The music machine has so disgusted many of us that we have trouble seeing people who act against their interests, even illegally, as bad
If you are going to be a criminal... (Score:3, Funny)
Not enough to share? (Score:3, Funny)
Seriously though, the RIAA doesn't care who you are so long as you've got their material without paying for it. Instead of this whole big campaign against people who share their material, why not use it to pay the artists in compensation for the money they "might" be losing?
Don't you know? (Score:1, Funny)
11. Thou shalt not challenge the authoritai of The Wife.
12. Thou shalt not use a law paid for by a corporation against that same corporation.
13. Thou shalt not put the Chest Pain unit for Seniors on the 13th floor of a Hospital.
You know, I just have to say . . . (Score:4, Funny)
Then, while it writhes on the sidewalk, I'd turn to the MPAA, and say, "You're next, Nancy."
Then I'd swagger off to Moe's for a Duff.
Wow, my data is worth alot! (Score:3, Funny)
Dave
Re:Assassination? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:What? (Score:3, Funny)
Actually, it is.
Most criminals aren't caught, most stolen property not recovered, most murders not solved.
However, the *risk* of getting caught deters a lot more people than the number of people being thrown behind bars.
Re:difference between the RIAA and Michael Jackson (Score:2, Funny)
RIAA INVADES HOMES!!! (Score:2, Funny)
You heard it here first.
The RIAA has been conducting SURPRISE RAIDS [processrequest.com] of people's homes.
RIAA represents the Artist??? (Score:3, Funny)
said RIAA President Cary Sherman. "That's our job!"