E-Voting Glitch: 19,000 Voters, 144,000 Votes 601
nick_davison writes "The Indianapolis Star is reporting the latest case of 'interesting' E-voting results. Tuesday's Boone County election, using MicroVote software returned 144,000 votes from 19,000 registered voters. After much panicking and tracking down the bug, the actual number of votes turned out as 5,352. With yet another mistake, does anyone still trust closed-source electronic voting?"
MicroVote Sucks (Score:2, Funny)
Let's just hope... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:MicroVote Sucks (Score:2, Funny)
There no longer seems to be any reason to vote. Since our corporate overlords now control the elections, and control the candidates anyway, we should simply let them choose directly.
Blackadder (Score:5, Funny)
True politics [powertie.org]
Re:What is wrong with an "X"?? (Score:1, Funny)
Reminds me of Office Space... (Score:4, Funny)
So ... (Score:5, Funny)
Actually, their software *IS* open source (Score:4, Funny)
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
printf( "%i\n", rand() );
return(0);
}
For Chicago... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Closed source? (Score:2, Funny)
If you subscribe to the notion that humanities job is to discover/understand everything it can about our unvirse/life then opensource very well could be the answer to life it self . Or at least part of the solution
Don't Worry, Be Happy (Score:5, Funny)
141,000 votes from 19,000 people... (Score:1, Funny)
Perfect solution (Score:1, Funny)
MicroVote software returned 144,000 votes from 19,000 registered voters.
This is the perfect solution for democrats in the upcoming presidential election.
How computers will finally reveal AI (Score:1, Funny)
Sure MicroVote will say that it wasn't their fault. 10 trillion voters obviously wanted a computer run US.
Lets be honest even their website looks like 8th rate programming.
Re:Actually, their software *IS* open source (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Does anyone trust closed source anything? (Score:2, Funny)
Diebold v MicroVote (Score:2, Funny)
Diebold [wordsmith.org] My fave: Be Dildo
MicroVote [wordsmith.org]My other Fave: Evict Room
slashdot = SAD SLOTH & SHALL DOS
Found the bug (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What is wrong with an "X"?? (Score:1, Funny)
And what we want is *punch*
Re:Blackadder (Score:0, Funny)
Anybody notice the number 144000 (Score:3, Funny)
Google on 144000 [google.com]
Personally I think that Judgement Day is nigh and that the AntiChrist will use an evoting machine to gain control of the world.
Or perhaps not.
Re:What is wrong with an "X"?? (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe it was just me, but I thought it looked more like a gigantic shredder.
Re:What is wrong with an "X"?? (Score:5, Funny)
b) a very short attention span.
I am very well capable of keeping my attention fixated on a point that is well worth my....Hey! Another article on Microsoft doing something bad!
Re:What is wrong with an "X"?? (Score:3, Funny)
He said votes, not voters...
Re:MicroVote Sucks (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Accounting (Score:3, Funny)
That's disgusting! Everybody knows that rewriting the results of an election is a job for the courts!
Re:MicroVote Sucks (Score:4, Funny)
And I quote...
# Don't complain about lack of options. You've got to pick a few when you do multiple choice. Those are the breaks.
# Feel free to suggest poll ideas if you're feeling creative. I'd strongly suggest reading the past polls first.
# This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers, dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything important, you're insane.
Good to see the legal system is getting some ideas from the fine folks of slashdot!
Looking forward... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Accounting (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe they took a vote.