EU Amends Software Patent Directive (Suggestions) 160
jopet writes "The EU has amended its draft proposal for a directive on how to handle patents on "computer-implemented inventions'. Several harsh points have been dropped and clarifications on what is patentable at all have been added. Good to see that protests and petitions can make a difference." YHBT. These are the suggestions from June.
Is this enough to stop a repeat of LZW? (Score:4, Interesting)
Amendment 20, Article 6 a (new) (Score:4, Interesting)
Member States shall ensure that wherever the use of a patented technique is needed for the sole purpose of ensuring conversion of the conventions used in two different computer systems or network so as to allow communication and exchange of data content between them, such use is not considered to be a patent infringement
Some points (Score:5, Interesting)
I won't be too sure about that, not when many MEP doesn't (have time to) browse Internet regularly.
(read Tom Chance's story about his lobbying efforts)
Small companies/individuals, which can not afford the cost, will simply admit defeat and comply to whatever the big corporations are demanding them to.
EU have no software-patent legislation now, and to my knowledge, there are no CLEAR cases that justifies this (feel free to enlighten me though)
Just my 2 pence on the topic.
Europe vs. U.S. (Score:2, Interesting)
So Europeans start to notice that pushing Open Source, be it adopting Linux on the desktop, be it simply not passing laws that make OSS development impossible, is going to give them a competitive advantage in the long run.
As a European, I would be as critical about "European Linux hegemony" as I am about "American Microsoft hegemony", but still... Issues like this one may sooner or later make U.S. lawmakers realize that in the end it's the economy, stupid.
Re:Is this enough to stop a repeat of LZW? (Score:2, Interesting)
6a: "Member States shall ensure that wherever the use of a patented technique is needed for the sole purpose of ensuring conversion of the conventions used in two different computer systems or network so as to allow communication and exchange of data content between them, such use is not considered to be a patent infringement"
So it seems to be allowed to compress data using LZW if that is need to communicate to a system that assumes data is compressed with the LZW algorithm.
This still does not allow use of LZW in whatever application you want, but as soon as it is needed to communicate with some other system that happens to use LZW it should not be considered patent infringement.
Since i am not a lawyer i have no clue what happens if you want to communicate with a system that uses LZW illegally, but this 6a seems to offer some possibilities at least
Amazon patent excluded? (Score:2, Interesting)
This is just one of the 30.000 software related patents that have been granted by the EPO but which are not enforced yet by any European law. If the new law is not going to invalidate some of those patents, then it is simply useless, because patents granted by the EPO would define the interpretation of the law.
Re:There never was a Software Patent Free EU (Score:3, Interesting)
What do we know, are they enforceable or not?
Re:Insightful? (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually, it is. Or at least trying very hard to be. The European Patent Office has been issuing [ffii.org] software patents for years, even though it isn't allowed to. They can't be enforced yet, but that will change if the directive passes and is implemented.
Furthermore, the quality of the examination of patent application has decreased drastically [ffii.org] for some time now.