DeCSS Loses Free Speech Shield 613
JohnGrahamCumming writes "BusinessWeek/CNET is reporting that the California Supreme Court has ruled that 'a Web publisher could be barred from posting DVD-copying code online without infringing on his free speech rights.' They also say that 'the state Supreme Court ruled that property and trade secrets rights outranked free speech rights in this case.'" According to the article, this "...overturned an earlier decision that said blocking Web publishers from posting the controversial piece of software called DeCSS, which can be used to help decrypt and copy DVDs, would violate their First Amendment rights."
Oh shit! (Score:2, Funny)
Goodbye free speech! (Score:1, Funny)
No time now for detailed analysis... (Score:5, Funny)
Ah, shit.
Sometimes, the continued reporting of how our rights as consumers are being eroded makes me want to put slashdot in my barred hosts file. And then move to a cave. I'm sick of this crap, I really am.
T-Shirts (Score:5, Funny)
Mr. Cox (Score:3, Funny)
Does this mean that DeCSS isn't protected under "fair use" either? Bastages.
In other news..... (Score:2, Funny)
DeCSS Meta Comment (Score:5, Funny)
damn (Score:2, Funny)
Which came first? (Score:4, Funny)
Right, because you know, since property and trade secrets rights are guaranteed in the Zeroth Amendment to the Bill Of Rights, they outrank the First Amendment, don't they?
Re:DeCSS Meta Comment (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Mod Parent Down (Score:5, Funny)
nope, all ok so far.
your turn: go out into a major city with a broomstick in your hands and shout "allah is great! allah is great" and see how long you last.
Re:What is this DeCSS? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:T-Shirts (Score:3, Funny)
Re:illegal prime (Score:5, Funny)
#!/usr/bin/perl
Anyone else see the irony in using Perl to make something less obfuscated?
Re:The solution (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Mod Parent Down (Score:5, Funny)
A lot longer than someone preaching Christianity in Mecca.
Re:DeCSS Meta Comment (Score:5, Funny)
Re:illegal prime (Score:3, Funny)
This number was patented I believe.
Re:Hypocritical (Score:3, Funny)
Sad answer to the rhetorical question...
Where does the input file go in this? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:No time now for detailed analysis... (Score:3, Funny)
That would be a cave with a broadband connection, right? I mean... for a second there, I thought you were going a little too far.
And in related news . . . (Score:1, Funny)
Dear California Supreme Court: +1,FairAndBalanced (Score:3, Funny)
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# 531-byte qrpff-fast, Keith Winstein and Marc Horowitz
# MPEG 2 PS VOB file on stdin -> descrambled output on stdout
# arguments: title key bytes in least to most-significant order
$_='while(read+STDIN,$_,2048){$a=29;$b=73;
$m=(11,10,116,100,
-2?0:$m&17)),$b^=$_%64?1
=5;$_=unxb24,join"",
d=unxV,xb25,$_;$e=256
$d^$d/8))>8^($t&($g=($q=$e>>14&7^$e)^$q*8
Re:The obvious response: (Score:3, Funny)
Privilegde is a spelling error!
grib.
Re:The solution (Score:3, Funny)
There are plenty of other countries that don't have such a crazy legal system.
Which only lasts until America decides to "liberate" the country...