9th Circuit Court Finds 'Thumbnailing' Fair Use 266
mark_wilkins writes "A photographer named Leslie Kelly had sued Arriba Soft Corporation for infringing his copyrights to photos when they made thumbnails of his pictures and stored them in a public image search engine. Today the federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling that making these thumbnail copies of images for the search engine was 'fair use.' Since the applicability of fair-use defenses to copyright infringement touches on all kinds of common uses of the Internet as well as rulemaking related to the scope of the DMCA, this decision will probably have an effect on the discussion. (Note that this case was decided by a 3-judge panel and thus isn't binding precedent.)" Note that the court also reversed in part the lower court's ruling, specifically saying that the lower court should not have ruled on "whether the display of the larger image is a violation of Kelly's exclusive right to publically display his works."
Good (Score:5, Funny)
One small step for law, one giant leap for freedom!
Leslie Kelly (Score:3, Funny)
Leslie Kelly.
Poor guy. He's got *two* girls names.
Makes that poor schmuck Sue sound lucky.
When is a picture not a picture? (Score:3, Funny)
Applying the same logic (Score:4, Funny)
Does this mean that I can legally share very small versions of pop songs? Like maybe, half a verse and the chorus?
Or does it mean I can legally share the same songs if the volume is very low?
Inquiring minds want to know!
Re:Applying the same logic (Score:2, Funny)
Re:When is a picture not a picture? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Applying the same logic (Score:3, Funny)
Courts (Score:5, Funny)
Oh great. Another ruling from the most overturned appellate court ever.
</fat_comic_book_guy_from_the_simpsons>
Dr Seuss! (Score:2, Funny)
It IS binding precedent. (Score:2, Funny)
The decision is binding precedent in the 9th Circuit (many Western states, including California), unless more judges, or the Supreme Court, get together to overrule it.
See Roundy v. Commissioner, 122 F.3d 835, 837 (9th Cir. 1997) ("A three-judge panel is bound by a prior judgment of this court unless the case is taken en banc and the prior decision is overruled.")
(IAAL, but - disclaimer oblige - this is not legal advice)
Re:Good (Score:5, Funny)
wow (Score:1, Funny)
When is a picture not a picture? When it's a pixel (Score:4, Funny)
Just to be safe, I cut the picture up into individual pixels and then reassemble them into a single new image. And you can't own a single pixel
Cheers,
IT
Re:When is a picture not a picture? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Good (Score:3, Funny)
FirstThirtySeconds.com (Score:3, Funny)
Good thinking... I'm going to immediately go register FirstThirtySeconds.com, SecondThirtySeconds.com, ThirdThirtySeconds.com, etc, etc... Then someone from Estonia will write a program to recompile these clips.