Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Government Your Rights Online News

Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on P2P Dangers 10

marshall11 writes "From the Senate Judiciary Committee's website: "The Senate Committee on the Judiciary scheduled for today at 2:00 p.m., on "The Dark Side of a Bright Idea: Could Personal and National Security Risks Compromise the Potential of P2P File-Sharing Networks?" has been rescheduled for Tuesday, June 17, 2003 at 2:00 p.m. in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Building.' Ok /.ers who knows what's going on with this? It's only a week away; is anyone testifying or appearing as a friend of the Committee? Is anyone planning on testifying? What issues are going to be raised?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on P2P Dangers

Comments Filter:
  • Okay, I guess this is pretty much guaranteed to rob me of karma, but how the hell did this submission get accepted? There is NOTHING here! NOTHING! You go to the website and it says NOTHING! It's just some guy asking a "did you hear that..." question. Shouldn't an article on "News for Nerds" contain a tiny smidgen of actual news or information?

    I'm not going to castigate the poster for failing to do research because I tried a google search right now and couldn't find anything myself. But I don't see h

    • by Kalak ( 260968 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @01:23PM (#6172986) Homepage Journal
      Maybe the fact that there is no available information about this hearing means that it's not really important.

      Or the lack of available info on this may show that it was trying to be slipped in under the radar of those who are speaking about the "Dark Side" being not as dark as they think. I'm sure there are tons of committee hearings that we don't hear about on /. afterall. This one just happens to be about a subject talked about here frequently, and a bunch of Senators are getting to talk about it. I can't think of a reason the time and place of it should be posted here. After all, no one on /. can see what Senators are on the committee [senate.gov] and call them, no one on /. lives in DC, and no one watches the news anyway.

      It's not like we can do anything to contribute. Much better to moan about it on /.
    • I would say that the senate judiciary committee announcing a meeting on the "darkside of P2P" is newsworthy information.

      I agree that it sucks that that is all the information available on the website, but hopefully someone else will be able to locate more info and post it here. The website left the witness list blank. I hope someone can dig that up.

      -
    • Thanks for not castigating me. I actually submitted it as an "Ask Slashdot." Honest. I tried to do research too and when I couldn't find anything I decide to submit it under Ask Slashdot. For some reason though, somehow, it got changed to a "Your Rights Online." I couldn't find it for over a week. I thought the editors were holding onto it for some reason.
  • by Kalak ( 260968 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @01:13PM (#6172873) Homepage Journal
    Yes.

    So could the spy decoder ring in a box of cereal, the fertilizer in our local hardware store, and so could the rat poison, the SSL self-signed cert I created a few days ago, so could......

    Judging by the title of "The Dark Side of a Bright Idea: Could Personal and National Security Risks Compromise the Potential of P2P File-Sharing Networks?", I'd say that someone's mind is made up already. The "Dark Side" of anything is not going to be shown in a positive "light".

    I hope someone is there to represent wiser heads. At the rate things are going, ACs on /. posting from proxies the US builds to get aroung the Great Firewall will be the only way Terrorists can communicate.
  • by dpilot ( 134227 ) on Wednesday June 11, 2003 @01:27PM (#6173028) Homepage Journal
    If you want to speak with Friends of the Committee, I'd suggest you start with public relations offices of the RIAA or MPAA.

    Boy is that a cynical and UGLY attempt at a joke. Or is it a diatribe at the truth?
  • Absolutely nothing gets said before this hearing happens and then all we get to hear is Sen. Hatch ridiculous comments. [slashdot.org]

    As a note to others, I submitted this last week in an attempt to raise intelligent discussion *before* the hearing, because I was fairly certain there wasn't going to be any *during* the event.

    This is one of those times when I hate being right.

"Only the hypocrite is really rotten to the core." -- Hannah Arendt.

Working...