Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Your Rights Online

RFID Kill Command Proposed To Ease Privacy Concerns 32

Posted by timothy from the only-the-tags-you-know-about dept.
morcheeba writes "In the ongoing RFID benefits vs. privacy concerns saga, backlash has prompted manufacturers to include a password-protected "kill" command into new RFID protocols. Will this eliminate too many of the benefits for manufacturers?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

RFID Kill Command Proposed To Ease Privacy Concerns More

RFID Kill Command Proposed To Ease Privacy Concerns

Comments Filter:

  • How would you know (Score:4, Interesting)

    by epsalon ( 518482 ) <slash@alon.wox.org> on Monday April 28, 2003 @05:22PM (#5829055) Homepage Journal
    OK, they implement the "kill" feature. But - How can the customer know they RFID tag was in fact killed? They can just say they killed it, and the customer has to believe.

    • Re:How would you know (Score:3, Insightful)

      by shdragon ( 1797 )
      From a business standpoint what's to stop a shoplifter from just doing a kill command on desired merchandise?
      • The kill command is password-protected.
      • hopefully it's the "password protection". If they implemented it correctly, it wouldn't be static or easily derived from an algorithm; otherwise eavesdropping on the kill message traffic would allow an attacker to kill all the tags in a store. A crypto engine in the tags themselves would work (the best solution), or terminals would need to be connected to a kill-password-database. Or, the password scheme may just suck. I'll be on the lookout for the implementation details...

      • Re:How would you know (Score:3, Insightful)

        by SagSaw ( 219314 )
        From a business standpoint what's to stop a shoplifter from just doing a kill command on desired merchandise?

        Yes, a kill command would weaken the ability for RFID tags to be used to prevent shoplifiting. But you know what? Determined thieves would find a way to disable the tags with or without the kill command. The issue is whether the ability to stop casual shoplifters is more important than the ability for typical consumers to choose to inactivate tags in items they own.
    • Analogous to opt-out, eh? :)
    • I forsee a nice market for user-carried RFID zappers. Over on the halfbakery [halfbakery.com] (a site for discussing ideas and inventions) I posted some thoughts on the features [halfbakery.com] someone would want in such a device.

      Anyone want to start a company around it? (Only half serious).

    • Re:How would you know (Score:1, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward
      How can the customer know they RFID tag was in fact killed?

      The same way you know they aren't using RFID's right now.

  • Well its a start, we need more of thease stories these days

  • Sorry, not good enough (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Jahf ( 21968 ) on Monday April 28, 2003 @06:09PM (#5829460) Journal
    This doesn't work for me ... sorry, but RFID as-is is just potentially too invasive. It will be like wearing hardware cookies on your body or in your tires. I like cookies in my browser, but I still place some restrictions on them.

    The only viable option to preserve consumer privacy while enhancing retail usability would be legistlation that requires the RFID tag to be put on a removable label. Buy a shirt with an RFID tag? No worries, just tear off the removable tag. Put a recycling bin at the store exit or cash register and the company can even put the tags back into use (a well done RFID database should allow the store to deactivate an RFID upon purchase and reactivate upon recycling).

    Worried about shoplifters removing the RFID tag before purchase? Too bad. A smart shoplifter will find a way around this system, too (heck, RFID tags may in theory make it -easier- to do the old price tag switching maneuver, too). To make it a bit nastier, make it illegal to remove the tag before purchase. Embedding the tag in an unremovable place is bound to be attractive to companies that want to be sure nothing walks out the door, but sorry, I'm willing to pay a bit more for merchandise and have my privacy secure.

    Otherwise I'll wait until some bright folks invent a nice little RFID jammer before I buy from a store that has these implemented or a proven device that can fry RFIDs.

    A jammer should not be that hard to do. It could sense when an RF signal was going out to read the tags and then respond back with tons of nonsense tags (like the 802.11b project that broadcasts thousands of fake SSIDs). Or it could sense when your RFID tag was -responding- and send stuff out then. You could make it illegal to use the scanner in a retail chain, but once out the door turn it on so that your car's tires can't be scanned at McDonald's.

    A truly intelligent scanner could be made that figured out your RFID signatures, uploaded them to other people with a jamming device, then you can help foil the inevitable scanners by carrying around random RFIDs of other people in the system.

    Seriously, if people could read the bar tags off whatever box you were carrying around, even when it was in a bag, do you think people wouldn't carry big fat black magic markers around to disable the bar codes after purchase (or simply rebel against the concept of bar codes)?

    I seriously don't want to have to expand my concept of a "personal firewall" to this level. Privacy has been nearly destroyed as-is, but at least I can still buy a shirt, tires, etc with cash and not have it logged with my name. But RFID enables complete tracking of individuals who carry the tags around. A quick example for closing (since I'm sure someone is going to say this is bogus):

    * I buy tires for my Jeep that have embedded RFID tags so that the local tire shop can easily track their inventory.

    * I drive to McDonald's for a burger with those tags installed.

    * McDonald's doesn't know what the RFID was for originally, but they really don't care, they can just assign the RFID to me.

    * McDonald's doesn't know who I am though ... and at that point I wouldn't mind them giving me targetted ads or coupons at the drive through based on my anonymous RFID in their database ... BUT ... I forget to grab cash and stumble upon a McD's that takes credit (I think they either do now in some places or are planning to) so I fork over my card. *BANG* they know my name and some of my habits (as well as locations I've been if I tend to stop at McD's on those long road trips). It doesn't matter if I pay for everything after this point with cash as long as I drive my car there.

    * Every store owned by McDonald's (did you know they own Chipotle for instance?) now knows about me. Better yet, some genious can now decide to sell my information to other marketing organizations.

    * Add to this an RFID in your cellphone, you carry that everywhere, and the
    • This rush to a totally surveilled, cashless society, bugged, videoed, tracked, data mined, rush to the new world order big brother stuff is just plain disgusting. I think if we can't stop it now it will make a borg-like society look like a libertarian convention in the woods.

      Some technology is good, other technology can be *not so good*. You give big brother unlimited funds, the ability to semi collapse economies so they can get all the techs they need lining up for "work", paying off the research universi
    • device that can fry RFIDs.

      I'm pretty sure a microwave oven will thoroughly fry an RFID. I don't think the wife is going to like seeing you roll a set of car tires into the kitchen though, and I'm not quite sure how you're going to fit them in the oven.

      -
      • People throw old microwaves away at the curb all the time. Stop one day and pick one up and do an autopsy on it.

        The microwave unit inside is a little metal canister with an antenna protruding from it. It rather resembles an LNB on a E* satellite dish Examine the power supply system and you will see that it's easy to gut one down to the minimal components needed to build a nukem ray gun...

        Care though, it WILL cook you if you point it at yourself or others! Make sure to use a metal tube to sheild and di
    • did you know they own Chipotle for instance?

      If you find a Chipotle with a drive-thru, I'd love a map
    • McDonald's doesn't know what the RFID was for originally, but they really don't care, they can just assign the RFID to me.

      What's to stop McDonald's from taking a digital snapshot of your license plate. Ever driven across the border lately? Customs booths all take snapshots of your license plates as you drive up. Nothing to stop McDonald's from doing the same thing. The question is, why would they want to?

      But my point is, if you have license plates on your car, which all states require, you have no an

    • The potential for abuse here is enormous. Do you think that the alphabet agencys not just of the US but of the entire world will fail to take advantage of this WASS (we are soo screwed)
    • I do not have any bank accounts of any type, anywhere.
      I do not use banks at all. I live purely by cash and cash alone. Everything I own is paid for in full. I owe no one.
      I make all my payments either in cash or money orders in person or through the mail.
      [rant]
      When they do away with cash and force people to live by electronic transaction I will leave this country and move to another country, possibly a third world country where you can trade a pound of nails for 3 fish and a coil of rope for a case of bul
  • How do we know that this 'kill' command kills the RFID tag and not...say... the user ?! Next thing you know, they'll be putting these things in your teeth! And when I say "they" I mean the Martians...right after the anal probe.

    No, I will not take off my tin foil hat....
  • Opponents of RFID tagging say the tags make it theoretically possible to "profile" a consumer remotely... But that scenario is unlikely "unless you live in a totalitarian state with a perfect information architecture"

    Umm, does this cover countries other than the US? I don't know about perfect, but it's definitely totalitarian.
  • Kind of interesting, but.. I think people are much more concerned about RFID than they should be.
    Passive low frequency RFID's which are generally what people are 'scared' of are just little reflectors for radio frequency. They emit their serial number. Whoopty doo. The cheapest ones, which we are likely to see used in retail situations transmit on 30Khz to 500Khz.

    What's to stop someone from bringing a jammer into the store? Or broadcasting fake ID numbers at the antenna? The possibilities of destroying the

    • Another interesting option ... if a company uses these to inventory high-dollar items and someone figures out how to get them out the door while leaving the RFID behind, how long might it take for the company to figure out they've been heisted?

      My point being 2-fold:

      1) RFID can't be made theftproof (or at least reasonably so) without making the tags a permanent part of the product (see my other post for why I don't consider this acceptable)

      2) If it is not theftproofed, then the company still has to rely o
  • "RFID kill" is obviously not the solution. Not sure of how this "kill" technology would be implemented, but it's easy to imagine one type. If it's convenient for a privacy-concerned consumer to hold a small gadget or wand above an RFID-impregnated good like a shirt or a pair of pants to "kill" the RFID in the comfort of home, it will also be convenient for a shoplifter in a store.

    This is one of those fundamental dilemmas. RFIDs or privacy: pick one.

    The winner of this will be decided by power. Whoever ha

    • Before anyone quips about the RFID "kill" feature being password-protected, please tell me how that is going to be implemented securely. What are they going to use, PGP? Are they going to generate unique keys for every RFID? I thought there were going to be billions of RFIDs. I thought RFIDs were too small to have a CPU capable of doing high-end encryption.

      Oh, they're going to use an uncrackable password protection system? Like one time pad? Don't make me laugh. There's no way to keep the secret keys secr

      • If you use other technology for anti-shoplifting applications RFID still has it's uses in a retail environment. Think of it as barcode on steroids.

        You can still track items and parts through the supply chain. You can still take inventory without needing someone to go physically count every item. You can still use it to speed up checkout. You can still use it to rotate perishable stock. There are still some downsides to the technology, but as long as the chips can be killed once they leave the store the dan
  • From what I understand RFID's run on the power they recieve from the transmitter. What if you use a microwave or other kilowatt transmitter to power the RFID? I think that if a microwave can make a fork arc it should make short work of an RFID.
  • ...under one condition. Namely, that anyone selling merchandise with RFID tags is required by law to physically remove those tags at the time of purchase. As a corollary, any manufacturer which puts RFID tags into merchandise would be required to do so in such a way that this could be done.

    All the benefits of RFID, but minus the privacy concerns, since any legitimately-purchased merchandise would be de-tagged before it left the store.
    • "since any legitimately-purchased merchandise would be de-tagged before it left the store. "

      Mistakes happen, little magnetic tags currently used occasionally get left in things. Last time I purchased a wallet for example, the clerk flipped it open looked through it, and didn't find a little magnetic tag in it. Took me a few months to figure out why I was beeping intermittenly at the scanners everywhere. Thats not likely to happen too often, or be a major concern though, it's not institutionalized tracking
  • If the RFID is used for inventory management, then a killable (or removable) RFID is entirely sufficient for industry needs, and limits the privacy threat dramatically.

    (If it's intended to prevent shoplifting, or for various after-purchase marketing purposes, then any RFID that can be reliably killed or removed is obviously not sufficient for industry needs.)

    Personally, I won't mind RFID tags if they can be reliably killed. Or at least, I don't think it's a big privacy issue...

    It exacerbates some econom

Slashdot Top Deals

He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.

Close