Tempers Flare Over Ill-Tempered Sword Remarks 69
msaulters writes "The Austin American Statesman is reporting on Daniel Watson, a Hays County swordsmith who is suing a group of San Francisco-based techies, charging that they extorted him by posting negative comments regarding his sword-making business on the discussion forums they host and then offering to clamp down on such comments if he bought advertising with them. On the one hand, this sounds very chilling, as the defendants, Sword Forum International, are very well-known and respected in the world of sword-making, and abuse of that position would be very un-cool. On the other hand, they make some valid points in the article, and historically, the ability to express your opinions freely online is one aspect of the internet that arguably should never be curtailed."
Blackmail, Libel (Score:5, Funny)
On the other hand, they make some valid points in the article, and historically, the ability to express your opinions freely online is one aspect of the internet that arguably should never be curtailed."
Is Blackmail or Libel protected speech?
so the website is mightier than the sword? (Score:5, Funny)
usually (Score:4, Funny)
He sells a sword called "Bringer of Tears" (Score:4, Funny)
Saber tattling? (Score:1, Funny)
Good lord, no wonder they removed it. (Score:3, Funny)
natural energy your body has as well as their
swords do. That page had me singing the highlander
theme song and saying "there can be only one!" in
a chrisopher lambertesque voice.
This shouldn't be settled in court... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:On the contrary... (Score:1, Funny)