Uni Students Slammed For Music Swapping 437
jomaree writes "The SMH Online reports that Sony, EMI and Universal will be in the Federal Court today, in an attempt to stop students using uni computers to swap music files. Michael Speck, the director of Music Industry Piracy Investigations, is quoted as follows: 'And we're not talking about one track here, one track there,' he said. 'We're talking piracy, significant examples of piracy.' By contrast, Sydney Uni says it knows of one student with a handful of files on a website, which does actually sound quite a bit like one track here, one track there."
Uni Students? (Score:4, Funny)
Sue those theives! (Score:5, Funny)
They don't have anything?
oh.
John Q Student had a track... (Score:5, Funny)
John Q Student had a track, EIEIO
And on this track he had a song, EIEIO
With a "track track" here and a "track track" there
Here a "track" there a "track" everywhere a "track track"
John Q Student had a track, EIEIO!
(God I love having to stay up late to do homework)
On behalf of everyone (Score:5, Funny)
They are "swapped" for free using special software, robbing artists and their record companies of royalties
On behalf of everyone and as a gesture of goodwill I would like to volunteer to try and make it up to Kylie for this heinous crime. Someone else can do the record companies
Re:Sue those theives! (Score:5, Funny)
Meanwhile, they will probably be kicked out of the University and possibly blacklisted at others.
<sarcasm> Yup... ruin a few college kids lives, the RIAA is really going to win a lot in this legal battle.</sarcasm>
In Other News (Score:5, Funny)
"It's not just a few students lending a few novels here and there" aaid spokesperson I.L. Douche. "Some campuses have an entire building filled with books which they lend out to anybody."
Re:Uni? (Score:5, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:By the same logic.... (Score:2, Funny)
Goodbye Britney! (Good riddance!)
Re:Uni Students? (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, those crazy Aussies with their 'barbies' (not anti-feminist dolls) and their 'tinnies' (not canned food).
How dare they violate the colourful English language in such a way, an honourable language which for centuries has been at the centre of trade and commerce? Their pathetic Australian dialogue, in my judgement at least, can never claim to match up to that of those in dear old blighty! If only there was a licence for the use of English, it would surely be revoked!Re:cooperation is mandatory (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Uni is the proper British/Australian English (Score:1, Funny)
I guess by your definition ebonics must be an advanced language.
By my definition, you're an idiot.