Verizon Loses Suit Over Subpoena of Subscriber Info 670
Brian Golden writes "As a result of a suit filed by the RIAA, the identity of a Verizon customer with a penchant for mp3's was ordered to be released. Man, how many people are now sweating bullets trying to remember what they downloaded?" News.com.com also has a story. If you've forgotten about this case, see our earlier story. Verizon wasn't making any sort of principled stand to protect its users' privacy, it just wanted to avoid the costs of complying with the (many) subpoenas it will now receive.
too easy... (Score:5, Funny)
cash money (Score:2, Funny)
Finally the money to RIAA will really start rolling in. If they can just put a few more of
their custom^H^H^H pirates in jail it'll be good times for artis^H^H^H shareholders.
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/
Re:More than 1.1 billion pigs are killed each year (Score:1, Funny)
Trolls! The other white meat!
sky.isFalling() = True (Score:5, Funny)
We now live in a world where anonymity no longer exists, we have to pay for music, and an ugly 18 year old Canadian chick is at the top of the US music charts?
I need a Tums...
Re:More than 1.1 billion pigs are killed each year (Score:1, Funny)
Yes.
Mmmmmm. bacon.
Where's Johnny Cochrane and the Chewbacca Defense (Score:5, Funny)
Re:too easy... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:That'll show him (Score:3, Funny)
Re:User in question is serving 600 songs? (Score:2, Funny)
I think the only reason they know about P2P apps is because it was on 60 minutes.
Re:The cost is complying with the request (Score:4, Funny)
If I were the ISP, I'd comply with any request RIAA gave me for customer logs. I'd send 'em every byte every customer transmitted or received.
I mean, what else am I gonna do with the half-dozen old line printers I found in the basement? :-)
RIAA forces Slashdot to divulge names (Score:1, Funny)
Caller ID : RIAA (Score:2, Funny)
RIAA : Now we know that you didn't know that all of this was illegal, so we're not going to press charges, sue you, or suck every last penny out of your lifeless corpse that we can under (over?) the law. We're just friendly people who want the best for the consumers!
Yeah, right...
Re:They're monitoring P2P, not sniffing the intern (Score:5, Funny)
Leave the RIAA alone (Score:4, Funny)
The RIAA produces the best music in the world like Nsync, Britney Spears, and uh, uh well my mind is blank right now on any new bands. But anyway since the bands listed above are such high caliber and will be remembered for centuries to come like Mozart and The beatles I am sure piracy has to be the real reason.
After all the RIAA is such a popular group of friendly, ethical, and hard working folks that consumers just love to buy from. They would have no incentive to boycut anyway. After all nobody even used napster back in 99 when they made record profits. Morpheous is so much more popular today and I am the big retailers are also hurting do to piracy. What they made money??? Well, uh I am sure its really still piracy. The economy is so strong right now and music is priced so low that it should just be flying off the shelves.
Poor RIAA they are the true ethical and honest victims of piracy.
Re:Obscure.. (Score:1, Funny)
It won't work, but would be nice to see a few thousand cases like these get some major publicity. Showing the public that the RIAA henchmen and RIAA are just as guilty
Re:These things are going to continue. (Score:3, Funny)
This got me thinking. Why not get rid of the performers all together since they are unimportant. I am a musician, and I would love to hear my booker do my gigs - really. That the music cartells have monopolized music distribution to the point where unless you kiss their nether sections it's hard to get work says that we have a problem with the music distribution mechanism not that the "Organizers" have anyinherent greater value to the process. Or maybe I'm totally off base and my booker is really hot on stage. I doubt it though.
That explains a lot! (Score:2, Funny)
...now those "your computer is broadcasting an IP address" banner ads make sense