No Face-Scanning Tech at San Diego Super Bowl 22
b3n writes "From our local paperspace fishwrap this article (http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/mon/ business/news_mz1b20snoope.html) ... "San Diego police have rejected the use of a controversial face-scanning technology for Sunday's Super Bowl, saying it's too costly and ineffective.
Face-scanning technology that compares faces in a crowd with digital photos of criminals, fugitives and suspected terrorists gained national attention and sparked an outcry when it was used at the 2001 Super Bowl in Tampa, Fla.""
Re:Ahhh.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ahhh.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Seriously you'd think that the tongue-and-cheek tone of the post would clue people in to the fact that a joke is indeed being made.
The system was useless... (Score:2, Insightful)
I am still on the fence as to the danger posed by systems such as these. Although I agree that having face recognition systems at events such as these might catch a few criminals, I am concerned that law-abiding citizens' rights may be trampled upon in the process. These systems are not foolproof, and will "catch" a certain percentage of innocents. How many peoples' Super Bowl have to be ruined by a quick trip downtown before the system is rejected by the public?
I'd be PISSED if it were me being wrongfully detained.
Scott
Re:Fourth Amendment? (Score:3, Insightful)
You should read up on Nazi and soviet propaganda. You don't get tyranny overnight, and we must learn to guard ourselves vigilantly.