"DVD-Jon" Faces Retrial 366
An anonymous reader submits: "Norway's special division for white-collar crimes, Økokrim, has decided to appeal the acquittal of 19-year-old Jon Lech Johansen, accused of copyright violation for helping bypass DVD code protection, web site Nettavisen reports."
Actions since your arrest (Score:2, Interesting)
So how do you respond to the hundreds of wannabes who rip and trade DVD movies "in your honor"?
Are those folks adding to your cause of Free Speech and Free Movie Software, and if so, do you feel you owe them anything?
i dont know about you guys but... (Score:2, Interesting)
Legitimate use (Score:4, Interesting)
Posterboy (Score:4, Interesting)
It seems like Norwegian authorities are trying to make Johansen a cybercrime posterboy as the US did to Mitnick.
xenaphobe wants to know ... (Score:3, Interesting)
I know this is a bit xenaphobic, but what does this ruling mean to those of us in the U.S.? If it's overturned, or if the ruling stands, will it have any impact on those of us under the DMCA and the RIAA?
Re:You can appeal an ACQUITTAL in Norway? (Score:4, Interesting)
This would not be permitted where there is protection from double jeopardy, such as afforded by the Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights.
Re:Sven, we cood be famoos, yah? (Score:5, Interesting)
And if you don't believe me, I'll introduce you to my mother-in-law, for whom "Ja" is a four sylable word with a two octave range, and who did not understand any of the dialect jokes in "Fargo", because that *is* the way she talks.
Re:Is this justified? (Score:1, Interesting)
I didn't mention the people that transcode the VOB's to divx or some other more lossy format, but the people that do this could also do the same thing through windows.
Legally, no, it is not their right to decide what can and cannot happen unless I sign a specific contract stating to that effect. I don't sign that 'invisible' contract when I buy a DVD because simply buying a product gives a few specific rights to both parties, but those rights are typically for the consumer.
There are hacks that allow windows only games to run on linux. That hack is called "WINE" and "WINEX".
To recap.
1) You don't need DeCSS to pirate.
2) If you wanted to transcode movies, you can do it in Windows also.
3) There are no implied contracts when I purchase a DVD that the DVD itself can only be played on specific OS's / Players
4) go to http://www.codeweavers.com to read about wine, etc.
Re:Is that even legal? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:You can appeal an ACQUITTAL in Norway? (Score:5, Interesting)
We had a case of a man who was first acquited by a city court then found guilty by a national court. But he fled to England and now can't be extradicted, because according to a brittish law, you can't be tried for same crime twice. (in america this is called double jepardy)
Re:i dont know about you guys but... (Score:3, Interesting)
Uhm, yeah, that sure is what they're doing. With all the interviews, and autobiographies, and biographies, and such he sure will be punished.
Who in the computer industry doesn't know DeCSS or Jon, at least at some level. How many people think his resume will shine more than any others in competition.
Rough times for a bit, but in the end, he'll continue to be acquitted and can make money off his trials and tribulations.
Re:You can appeal an ACQUITTAL in Norway? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Is this justified? (Score:3, Interesting)
Like it or not, 'DVD Jon' and his work, DeCSS, do aid pirates.
Like it or not, that doesn't matter. At least in the U.S., I'm not familiar with Norwegian law but regardless, it's bullshit. Cars are used to getaway from crimes, guns (the obvious analogy) are used in crimes, paper and pens are used to plan crimes. Guess we should start going after manufacturers of these products.
fark linked article says otherwise (Score:3, Interesting)
Boastful killer shows the court who's stupid [iol.co.za]
GREAT news! (Score:3, Interesting)
That's why I'm in favour of this latest development.
Re:You can appeal an ACQUITTAL in Norway? (Score:3, Interesting)
O.J. (for better or for worse) was acquitted. Yet through the loophole of Civil vs. criminal trials, he was tried again for civil damages and found guilty. This was a sham. This loophole should be closed. A not guilty verdict should mean just that. (again, this is not a testimony to his guilt or innocence, but rather an on topic comment that Not Guilty should mean Not Guilty!) Even in the case of DVD Jon.
And BTW, if he is convicted, wont we all sleep better at night knowing that he is off the streets!?!
WTF?
Re:Is this justified? (Score:3, Interesting)
Assuming that your statement that all of the DivX versions of movies available on DVD were created with DeCSS is true (it's not, but I'll let that pass), you've only "proven" that DeCSS can be and is used for piracy, which is still a far cry from proving that DeCSS is only used for piracy, or that it's intended to be used for piracy or even that it's primarily used for piracy.
As a counterexample, I use a descendent of DeCSS on a regular basis, but I've never pirated DVD movies (I have made infringing copies of VHS tapes, however -- better ban VCRs). So does everyone who watches DVDs using a non-DVDCCA-approved DVD player, such as xine. I also use a descendent of DeCSS to rip my DVDs and convert them to SVCD format so that my kids can watch (and destroy) the cheap copies rather than the relatively expensive originals. Such backup purpose should fall under Fair Use. I could also use DeCSS to extract snippets of a movie to include them in a commentary video, which definitely would be Fair Use.
There are many legitimate uses for DeCSS. As for what the *primary* use is, I couldn't guess. I know a lot of the movies available for download couldn't have been ripped from DVD since they're up for download before the film is even released on DVD (or at times before it's even released in the theatres!)