Copyright Office Asks For Public Comments On DMCA

krygny writes "A number of news sites (ZDnet, theregister) are reporting that the US Copyright Office is accepting feedback on the affects of the DMCA. While it's unlikley to prompt changes in the law, lucid and valid anectdotes of how fair use of certain materials is infriged upon, may help determine the degree and nature of enforcement."

This is a repeat

[Anonymous Coward]

This article is a repeat of this one [slashdot.org].

Re:Wow...

[dangit]

Actually, Slashdot beat Slashdot to this a couple of days ago.

See: This news post [slashdot.org]

Will wonders ever cease?

Not until November 19, 2002

[sdo1]

The Copyright Office page [copyright.gov] says "Electronic submissions may be made through this website beginning Nov. 19, 2002, through Dec. 18."

That's more than a month away. That'll slip right off my radar screen unless I have a reminder.

Put it in your PDA. In your favorite scheduling software. In you little black book. On your fridge. Whatever you like, but do it NOW. This is a really good way for the evils of the DMCA to be entered into record, even if (for now) it's just a formality.

-S

Re:This is a repeat : Editors should watch out...

[bsdparasite]

Looks like everyone who criticizes /. gets a bashing when it comes to the articles themselves. Several stories are repeated, like the one with life on Venus.
First article [slashdot.org]
And another one [slashdot.org]
Obviously the editors accept certain stories without question as long as it's about the DMCA or aliens. And I will be modded down for this. I know.

Just vote.

[gpinzone]

All we have to do is simply get people to vote, period. Politicians only listen to people that vote for them and/or give them money. That basically means that they listen to only a small minority of the population. My philosphy used to be "if you're stupid enough not to vote, then your opinions don't count." I still don't disagree with that idea, it's just that politicians no longer look to comprimise. They just play to their particular base of supporters that gaurentee them a vote. The only solution is to make it a law that every citizen MUST vote.

Re:What good will this really do?

[reallocate]

Here's a passage from the Copyright Office's notice:


"The Copyright Office is preparing to conduct proceedings mandated by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which provides that the Librarian of Congress may exempt certain classes of works from the prohibition against circumvention of technological measures that control access to copyrighted works. The purpose of this rulemaking proceeding is to determine whether there are particular classes of works as to which users are, or are likely to be, adversely affected in their ability to make noninfringing uses due to the prohibition on circumvention."

The Copyright Office can, within a rather limited scope, define exceptions to the DMCA.

Re:Posting comments here won't cut it.

[Anonymous Coward]

Please see http://www.copyright.gov/1201/fr2002-4.pdf for guidelines on content and format of acceptable submissions.

Content and format guidelines

[Anonymous Coward]

Found here:
http://www.copyright.gov/1201/fr2002-4.pdf

Re:CD Changer

[ccady]

You already have the right to copy your own CDs. Copying them onto your hard drive is legal. (Sharing them with thousands of others is not.) The RIAA is trying to convince you otherwise.

I don't want to spend $100 on another electronic device. I want to use the PC I already own.

As Cher said "They're my tits. If I want them put on my back, that's my business."

Re: FRUITFLY?

[scalis]

Don't be so negative about fruit flies.
They can train fruit flies to a number of different things... I read about single flies that were trained to avoid a course toward a visual object that had been associated with the aversive odor benzaldehyde. (to quote the site)
Study your flies on cshl.org [cshl.org]

READ THE NOTICE OF INQUIRY!!!

[Cerlyn]

I hate to say it, but no one has said it before me: READ the notice of inquiry [copyright.gov] BEFORE you comment! In it is a list of issues that were confused during the last filing, what the Library of Congress *can* change, and what the Library of Congress *cannot*.

If you filing a comment without reading this straightforward (albeight long) 19-page document, and you submit a comment that does not match its formatting/requirements or goes off base, chances are you will be IGNORED.

So please, read what the Library of Congress can and cannot do as well as how to format your submissions *before* the time to submit comments arrives, so when you do submit a comment, it will be taken in a good light.