Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy

How Has Post-9/11 Legislation Affected You? 1212

goldspider asks: "I hope this is received in the spirit it was intended in. In a recent Reuters article, the Internet as a whole has been referred to as 'collateral damage' of the U.S.-led War on Terrorism, because of the perceived loss in privacy and online rights as a result of post-9/11 legislation. I am curious to hear about some specific examples of how this legislation has personally or professionally affected the everyday lives of Slashdot readers."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Has Post-9/11 Legislation Affected You?

Comments Filter:
  • Canadian border (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Surak ( 18578 ) <surakNO@SPAMmailblocks.com> on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @06:32PM (#4232416) Homepage Journal
    I live a few miles from the Canadian border. I've been searched at least 20-30 times since September 11 going across to the Casinos in Windsor.

    I'm sick of people saying "Oh, it doesn't bother me because it makes me feel safer." It DOES bother me, and NO, it DOESN'T make me feel safer. If someone wanted to get across the border with explosives or something, they're gonna do it and these stupid spot checks aren't prevent it.

  • by havaloc ( 50551 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @06:33PM (#4232420) Homepage
    Can't say I've been effected at all. Things haven't changed, we just complain about different things, and have more access to the news that makes us angry.
  • The effects on me (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @06:42PM (#4232496)
    As an airport security worker, I feel as though my obligations have multiplied ten-fold. My responsibilities - especially morally have also greatly increased.

    The only upside to 9/11 for me has been that people now respect me for the job I try to do much more, previously people griped when being security checked but now very rarely does this occur.

    But there are a minority who judge me as though I am poor at my job, especially in light of the current security breaches (check UK news sites) of people managing to smuggle the same weapons as used to hijack the planes on 9/11 on to aircrafts now.

    This despite the fact I do the job as I always have done, believing I am protecting the people - working as hard as I possibly can to make sure the tragic events never occur again.
  • by soapvox ( 573037 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @06:49PM (#4232576)
    You are right it is worse when they say so, and I think the biggest thing that has changed since September 11 for me is the fact is now MORE people are willing to give up thier freedoms for security that isn't really there. I fly every week and I don't mind the extra searches and SFO is actually getting speedy, what I do mind is the fact that I feel it necessary to double think everything I email or post online because I KNOW that it is more scrutinized than before. And people just go along with Ashcroft in his quest for justice by denying US citizen rights they are given by our constitution, and if I am not mistaken terrorist don't like Americans because of thier freedoms, like freedom to follow whatever religion you want with out being targeted for it like a lot of Islamic groups are now being watched for, like the freedom to say what you like about the government without fear of retaliation, if we are not careful the terrorist will win by default if they take away our freedoms. If you want to fight terrorism, excersize your freedom of speech and tell Ashcroft to back off!
  • by Uttles ( 324447 ) <[moc.liamg] [ta] [selttu]> on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:00PM (#4232683) Homepage Journal
    It's a huge issue at Clemson University [eduslash.com]. There, tailgating for football games is a way of life. Up until 9-11, most people would go to the game, then go back to their tailgate spot during half-time (who wants to watch a band?). We'd drink and eat more, then go back to the game. Well, Clemson outlawed pass-outs [tigernet2.com] (funny name, considering all this drinking), which means you can no longer leave the stadium and return, unless of course you buy another ticket.

    This isn't all that important to the quality of life, but it's a good example of an institution making a profit oriented rule and hiding it under the false label of increased security.
  • Great article (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fluxrad ( 125130 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:03PM (#4232705)
    I just thought I'd mention this one since it was a great article.

    There was a letter to the editor in this quarter's issue of "2600."

    In it, this guy was talking about how he was pulled off a plane just before it was about to leave the gate because a flight attendant saw him reading an article in 2600 about vulnerabilities in "Passport." She claimed he was reading a terrorist pamphlet.

    The story of course ends with this guy being rescreened after talking to a few spooks and being let back on the plane. Of course, he said his flight was something like 2 hours late at this point.

    Screw the new laws, I'm more worried about the new public attitudes that are letting this kind of shit go down without so much as a second thought.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:07PM (#4232753)
    I've had to undergo a federal background check, been fingerprinted at work, got the "whiz quiz", the whole nine yards. And I'm a blue-eyed Minnesotan by birth, doing IT for a small regional airline (small turbo-prop planes only). I would imagine IT in bigger airlines have gone through even more security and background checking. (My HR gal actually kidded me about my younger years when she finished my background check)
  • by helixblue ( 231601 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:10PM (#4232794) Homepage
    The Triangle Mac Users Group [tmug.org] meetings are held at the EPA building here in Durham. ~50(?) Mac geeks toting around laptops talking in a small conference room with a projector. No big deal.

    Now, in order to get into the visitors area of EPA building where the "theatre" is, we have to fill out visitor cards with our name, address, phone number, etc. Then we have to fill out a check-in sheet with the guard (with our name, address, phone number, etc).. This isn't too bad, but a bit unusual for 50 people having to fill in to talk about their hobby.

    The clincher is we've got a 3rd peice of paperwork to fill out now: Our laptop information. Brand, Model, Serial Number, Name, Address, Phone number, etc. Of course, no one has their serial numbers memorized, so it's time to bust out the laptop bags.

    I can somewhat understand since it's in a "government" building - but this is a bit overboard for a hobbyist group meeting. It's worse than going to the airport - picture 50 geeks in line to fill out 3 peices of paperwork, and only 1 of them brought a pen!

    Enough ranting now I guess.. I'm gonna have to recommend we meet in McDonalds next time or something.
  • Re:Canadian border (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Jucius Maximus ( 229128 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:11PM (#4232800) Journal
    "I'm sick of people saying "Oh, it doesn't bother me because it makes me feel safer." It DOES bother me, and NO, it DOESN'T make me feel safer. If someone wanted to get across the border with explosives or something, they're gonna do it and these stupid spot checks aren't prevent it."

    It is so annoying at the borders. Going to the US with my father driving can be trying because he has one of those huge islamic-reminiscent beards (although he's not islamic) and the US border people always root through the car, look in all your containers, make a mess of everything, and don't put anything back where it was. Rude asholes. Do unto others as you would have done unto you. (If you're not white or with white people, you generally experience great discrimination at the US border crossing over from Canada. Sad but true. It's happenned to my family on numerous occasions, before and after 9/11.)

    On a similar note, a friend of a friend was driving from (Alberta) Canada to the Utah early this year to attend the Salt Lake City Olympics (as a spectator) and one of the guys he was going with was Islamic and wore a turban. They got across the border without too much trouble but on the interstate, there was a period of about 15 minutes where there was a state trooper car front of them, another behind them, and one on the side, totally boxing them in. The troopers backed off eventually, but still, it is unnerving and (both this the first story are) proof that just the way you look can bring about great discrimination from fearful people.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:11PM (#4232809)
    In The Netherlands, we 'feel' the direct threat of the US: your congress has signed an act that they preserve the right to *invade* the netherlands in the event any American will be brought before the new international court of justice over here in the Hague. A bit laughable and a side show, but it exemplifies the attitude of Bush et al, unleashed by 9/11: insulting the world in every way they can. Silly.

    When do the american people regain their ability to think for themselves? Bin Laden is still having a field day.
  • USA Patriot Act (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:15PM (#4232838)
    Here's an example of how law enforcement is using the USA Patriot Act: A few months ago, the FBI obtained my significant other's name, address and bank information from his ISP then specifically instructed the ISP not to inform him, in violation of its own privacy policy. This would not have been possible before the USA Patriot Act. This information led to a search of our apartment and the seizing of our computers (which have not been returned even though it is two months past the return date specificed in the warrant). Why? Well, the investigation has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism, cyber or otherwise. The USA Patriot Act was invoked because the MPAA filed a complaint with the FBI for alleged copyright violations.

    I'm SO glad this law is being used for its intended purposes. People who have no problems giving up their civil liberties in the name of "homeland security" are sadly mistaken if they think law enforcement has either the ability or desire to restrain themselves from misusing/abusing their new powers.
  • In New Zealand (Score:4, Interesting)

    by hengist ( 71116 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:19PM (#4232869)
    Before the events of September 12 (as it was here, we're 16 hours ahead of the USA), there was absolutely no security on domestic flights. No x-ray, metal detectors, nothing. There's never been a highjacking here, so we didn't think we needed any. Now, all of the major centres have security checking. The airport security is administered by the government, as well, not private companies.

    In May, I travelled to Honolulu for a conference. I flew directly from Auckland to Honolulu. At Auckland, on the way out, I had to go through two sets of metal detectors and x-rays, as well as a search of my carry-on luggage (although that may have been because I was carrying a plastic poster roll). When I flew from Honolulu back to Auckland, there was just a single metal detector and a single x-ray, and no-one searched my poster roll, which I was still carrying. In short, the security for international flights in New Zealand was much better than in Hawaii.

  • by Ehsan ( 606618 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:19PM (#4232875)
    For an Arab in the Middle East, some aspects of the internet have become frustrating. My credit card no longer receives the smooth transaction process pre-9/11. Half of all the purchases I tried to make through paypal, 2checkout, amazon, and several other vendors have been cancelled due to a "high fraud risk" because my credit card is from Saudi Arabia.

    Last month, I tried e-mailing a friend who goes by the name of Jamal Bin-Laden (not related at all to the terrorists, he's not even Saudi Arabian). He replied not to MY e-mail but to a forwarded e-mail from my Bahraini ISP. Apparently they blocked the e-mail because of his name, read the contents, and when they saw I was only asking him to bring back some tiny M&M's from London (I'm addicted!) they forwarded it to him without even bothering to cover their tracks. There goes online privacy for you.

    And on a related note, I had to cancel my post-grad plans to study in New York after all my Arab friends there came back. Let's just say people weren't very nice to them.

    While this might have nothing to do with American legislation, it's somewhat ironic to see how 9/11 effected everyone negatively, Americans & Terr^H^H^H^HArabs alike.

    May the victims of 9/11, the starved to death children of Iraq, and online rights all rest in peace.
  • by no reason to be here ( 218628 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:26PM (#4232934) Homepage
    They hate america because the american government has done so much harm to the rest of the world in the past 50 years, and it has done so little to help the rest of the world.


    brush up on your history. ever hear of the marshall plan? that helped out a few people. others might claim the fall of soviet-style totalitarian communism was a good thing, too. the US also played a central role in starting the IMF, UN, and other such agencies devoted to helping out the rest of the world. furthermore (i can't remember exact numbers, so forgive me) the US spends more on foreign aid than the next 9 richest countries combined.

    yeah, the US does so little to help out the rest of the world. the only rue thing in your post is that fuckers like bin-Laden are insane.
  • Re:No Changes... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Wesley Everest ( 446824 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:30PM (#4232972)
    Well, as dissident in the U.S., I'd say that things have changed quite a bit. I don't know that I would say that the changes are all a result of Sept 11th, though... Sept 11th just oiled the wheels. The Patriot Act is pretty scary stuff, but my impression is that it just legalized existing police practices. Of course, that means that you have less recourse when your rights are violated, and when the police break the law to stifle dissent, they'll probably go further.

    Am I afraid of police throwing me in jail without access to a lawyer or a trial? A little bit. In any repressive society, you learn to adapt, and you hope you aren't the one singled out for special treatment. You have to be realistic about risks, though. I'm more likely to be killed in a car accident than tortured by police, and I'm more likely to be tortured by police than killed by a terrorist. If you are an active supporter of Bush's perpetual war and are a white christian, then you're probably more likely to die at the hands of a terrorist than the police, but more likely to drown in your bathtub than either.

    But the effects of repression go much further than the direct victims. As long as repression against voting-rights activists in the South was successful, all blacks in the South had suffer the daily minor humilations of being second class citizens, as well as make less money for more work due to discrimination and greater power inbalance at work. The most visible effects of the racist violence during the civil rights movement were the bloody bodies and smouldering buildings, but you can bet that millions of blacks had to suffer inferior schools, longer work hours, less access to health care, etc.

    Currently, the repression we are seeing benefits anyone with power. For example, even if there isn't a strike on the west-coast docks, the dock workers will be forced to accept less at the bargaining table due to Bush's threat to replace dock workers with soldiers during a strike. This sort of thing will also have a chilling effect for anyone group of workers daring to stand up for themselves. And if some workers must accept less pay and benefits, it has a way of filtering out to the rest of society, making us all work longer for less.

    Think back to the days of the Soviet Union after Stalin. There were some high-profile cases of political prisoners, but it wasn't necessary to imprison millions to keep everyone in check. Or China after the massacre at Tiananmen square -- a few thousand were killed and probably a few thousand imprisoned, and that was enough to seriously impact a social movement that could have improved the lives of over a billion people. Sure, 99.999% weren't affected directly by the Chinese repression, but that's more an explanation of why the Chinese repression was successful than a justification for why it was acceptable.

  • by MongooseCN ( 139203 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @07:52PM (#4233165) Homepage
    I went through airline security recently and it is a joke. And absolute joke. I've concluded that it's just a placebo to make most ignorant people feel better. Why? Well here are a few things.

    When I was bringing my bag on the airline, I was checked 3 times. Getting onto every flight and my connecting flights. Somehow I triggered a "possible terrorist" flag and had people hand check my luggage. Maybe it was my scruffy beard?

    Anyways when they checked my carry on luggage they ran it through an Xray. They made me take my trekking poles out to see what they were (they are poles for hiking). They didn't care about the pot that showed up as a big grey cylinder in the middle of my pack.

    For my carry on luggage I had a camera lens in a 1Liter drink cooler. It was in there because it's soft to keep it from getting damaged. They never opened it up. I can think of all kinds of stuff to put in there... They never once checked the carry on bag itself. Couldn't something be hidden in the liner of the bag?

    Coming back I had to have my checkon bag checked again, but this airport didn't have any xray machines. They had to hand check everything. I gave the guy my bag, he opened it up and saw a backpack filled with stuff. He asked me "Is this all hiking gear?". I said yes and he just zipped it up and put it on the belt to go into the plane. Luckily that backpack has 75liters of gear in it and not explosives. I was thinking on the whole flight back:

    "Sir is this all camping gear in this backpack?"

    "No it's approximately 75Liters of C4."

    "Hmmm let me check my manual here... explosives, dynamite, C4. Sorry sir but you can't bring C4 on the plane. You must be an Al Queda terrorist?"

    "Why yes I am, I guess you caught me. Take me in."

    If a terrorist wants to bring something on the plane, it's going to get on the plane. The people who setup these security checkpoints are either:
    A. Ignorant.
    B. Setting up a Placebo
    C. Making a boost in their political career.
    D. All of the above.

    You choose.
  • Amtrak, etc. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Emmettfish ( 573105 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:13PM (#4233344) Homepage
    I've found that it's made life a pain in the ass not necessarily because of the government, but because of companies that react stupidly to the government.

    Case in point.

    I was on an Amtrak train to Washington, DC. I walked down the corridor, down the steps, onto the train. I hung out in my chair, and when I was asked for my ticket, I said, 'I'd like to buy one please.' We were already well on our way, and I'd bought tickets before on the train, not a big deal, there's like a three dollar surcharge or something.

    Nope.

    I was informed that I needed to get off of the train in Wilmington, purchase a ticket, and wait for the NEXT train to come by. This made me kinda late, and extremely irritated.

    I asked why I had to get off of the train.

    I was told that company policy had changed in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, I had to present photo ID, buy a ticket, and get on the train, I'm not allowed on the train without a ticket.

    I was already on the train. It was already moving. It was already about 30 miles out of Philadelphia. Let me make this point very clear. I WAS ALREADY ON THE TRAIN.

    I said to the guy, 'I'm already on the train. It's already moving.' He said I still needed to get off the train at the next stop, buy a ticket, and wait for the next train.

    I looked him square in the face and said, "Let's say I was a suicidal bomber or a terrorist, and I wanted to kill people or blow up the train. I could do it if I wanted to, because I am ALREADY ON THE TRAIN."

    "We don't like to hear things like that, sir."

    Sigh.

    I was already on the train. It was already moving. I sure hope everyone on that train felt safe.

    Emmett

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:14PM (#4233345)
    I won't go to airports for any reason, the "security" goons are out of hand. I'm confused as to how more gun control will prevent terrorist attacks... shouldn't we be arming civilians? And the Office of the Defense of der Vaterland has me totally bewildered... the color codes are too stupid to be real. A red flag means we're on to them, and the terrorists should lie low. A green flag means we're not expecting anything, so the terrorists can do whatever the hell they want and they'll surprise us. And where does one go to see the colored flags? How do I know what today's color code is if nobody flies the damned flags? Or is that a secret so the terrorists won't know if we're watching for them or not?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:27PM (#4233425)
    As a fellow private pilot it's my opinion that you are distorting the facts. If you fly under IFR, nothing has changed.

    On the other hand, VFR is a different matter. It's true that you have to avoid, nuclear power plants and it's also true that FAA either doesn't know or or is unable to tell you where the nuclear plants are located but if you can't spot the cooling tower of a nuclear power plant from 5 miles away, I don't want you in the same airpace with me.

    I would submit that general aviation has boomed since 911. Given the choice between flying in a commercial airliner with lots of strangers or flying in a private or chartered aircraft where you know all the passengers and the pilot, which choice would you take?

  • by rufusdufus ( 450462 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:31PM (#4233465)
    I got my license last july. But since I live near Seattle, I was unable to fly for months because the class B airspace over the area was extended to the ground and required instrument clearance.
    I havent flown as Pilot in Command since.
    I did however cross the country with my brother who is a commercial pilot, and we both got lots of flak by airport security for just being around the planes (our own plane!) by the FAA security guards. It is quite unpleasant to have to explain to every block-headed idiot in a uniform that yes, that is my plane, yes, I am a pilot yada yada yada.
    In order to get a pre-flight briefing, you are required to listen to a statement about suspicious people and terrorism. Its is stupid and inane and a real grind to listen to day in and day out.
    When planning our flights, we have to pay special attention to TFRs (temporary flight restrictions) or we can lose our licenses. There are several in the Seattle area which have never been lifted since Sept 11; visual flight rules cannot fly into these areas. This is a total joke since the terrorists planes were jumbo jets flying instrument rules, and those are still allowed everywhere.
  • by tenchiken ( 22661 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:34PM (#4233481)
    The biggest difference from 9/11 is the simple realization that we no longer live in a safe world.

    The biggest issues pre 9/11 were the condit mess, The fact that Europe was switching into a new currency, etc.

    9/11 has caused changes both old and new.

    American now has the best relations it ever has had with the Russians.

    America and Europe have gone back to their more traditional antagonistic viewpoint that has dominated the 400 year history of this country (with a 60 year break over the last bit).

    The problems of the Islamists have now become much more widly known. Remember all those girls dying in a fire in Saudi Arabaia because the Sadui's would not let the girls go out in public un-veiled.

    Groups like Lashkar Jihadi, RIF, etc are now exposed as the demons they are.

    No massive repatriation has occured of Muslims.

    The government has stopped somewhere between 5 and 10 terrorist attacks on US citizines over the last year.

    Make no mistake. Al-Qeda has ensured that at least the next fifty years will be a throwback to the crusades.
    That is what has changed in America. Compared to that, the Patriot act is nothing.

  • by sg_oneill ( 159032 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:39PM (#4233517)
    Has anyone else seen the Anti-Drug commercials saying that by buying drugs we help terrorists. This angers me since every sack I ever bought has been straight from Mexico.

    Yup. And do you know what the worst thing is?

    Even discussing this sort of stuff can get one branded as "unpatriotic" or "insensitive". Having worked in the media , it was clear that a HUGE chilling effect came over it, even over here in australia.

    Whereas we SHOULD ask questions like "Hey , is this interference in the mid east part of the cause of S/11. Why where we funding the taliban?", we havent been asking that, because any given question can be answered with "SHH! WHERE FIGHTING TERRORISTS! BOW YOUR HEAD IN SHAME!"

    And the cycle goes on... And get's nuttier too. Questioning govt anti-hacker legislation can get one branded as "un-patriotic". ditto for fcking phone tapping legislation, drug legislation, camp X-ray legislation..... Any questioning is..... "unpatriotic"

    So maybe we should give up , hey guys?... Freedom of speech is dead in the water. MIA.

    Those founding fathers would not be impressed with a president who claims "There should be limits to freedom". (Rant ends here)
  • by Darby ( 84953 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:50PM (#4233582)
    No, they're doing it because terrorists in more than one country (e.g., FARC in Colombia, Taliban in Afghanistan) raise money by controlling the drug trade.

    Dude. Wake up.
    The CIA is one of the major players in the drug trade.
    Crazy conspiracy theory? No. Just a very short memory on the part of most Americans. Recall The Iran Contra Hearings?
    It was testified on TV before congress that our government sells drugs to support terrorist countries. This is a demonstrated fact.

    And the Taliban, for fucks sake ?!? They instituted the death penalty for Opium cultivation , or don't you remember that either.

    Also, the war on some drugs causes massive amounts of money to go to police and prisons to incarcerate Americans who choose to cultivate a freaking plant.
    It's *very* profitable to have drugs illegal since the government gets paid twice.

    Buying an SUV does far more to support terrorism than buying drugs does. Where do the terrorists get most of their money? Oil.

    Please make at least a token effort to do your patriotic duty and inform yourself rather than spewing lies that any bit of common sense reveals for what they are.

  • by LuYu ( 519260 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:51PM (#4233590) Homepage Journal

    Are you asking how this has affected us in our daily lives besides:

    • the fact that governments around the world have now gotten the right to spy on anybody?
    • the fact that speech can no longer be free? (meaning that I and everybody has to watch what they say all the time... When I was a child, I was taught that this was a feature of oppressive socialist/communist regimes. Now it seems to be a feature Dubuya's global regime. You do the math.)
    • the fact that there is little or no regulation for these broad spying powers?
    • the fact that many countries are suggesting or enacting national biometric ID programs? (When I was a child, biometrics were for criminals (fingerprints). Does that make anybody who gives up biometric data to the government a criminal? I think so.)
    • the fact that by 2005 all foreign nationals (some of which are my friends) are going to have to submit biometric data to the US government to enter the country? (Is this like human region coding? It is certainly prejudicial, and you can count on the fact that they WILL ask US citizens in the future once it has been deemed "convenient" for foreigners. I suppose they could say it is not prejudical, then, could they not?)
    • the fact that by being a geek or different in any way I am now subject to the accusation of being a "terrorist"? (Looks like all those ex-football-player cops / thugs have an excuse to persecute geeks again.)
    • the fact that I cannot take a pair of tweezers on an airplane?

    The truth is, I am not really afraid of terrorists. I would certainly have a better chance of getting struck by lightning or winning the lottery and probably a better chance of experiencing both in the same day. I am afraid of government, though.

    The US government has been keeping records since the Social Security system was put in place. Everybody in the US has a primary key. IBM designed a similar system for the Nazis, and look what they did with it. What has IBM been designing for the US government since the 1930's? I am sure I do not want to know.

    When I was a child, I was taught that only people under oppressive socialist/communist regimes had to worry about their government spying on them. Now it seems, everybody has to worry. The entire industrialized world is now spying on its citizens, and these governments are looking to broaden their surveillance and information sharing.

    The government and the news media (the real terrorists) have drastically over estimated the threats posed by terrorists. As a result, the economy is in a slump. Jobs everywhere are scarce, and Linux has been directly affected by that ;)(ie. software projects canned by corporations, etc.)

    So, are you asking besides all that how this has affected me? Hmmm... Well, I have felt threatened since that day. A close relative of mine was fingerprinted at work (which means that she is now a criminal so far as the government is concerned, see above). I have postponed (indefinitely?) travelling to the US. I suppose I could also say that I have experienced a true witch hunt, just like the ones they told me about in school.

  • by mooneyguy ( 455024 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @08:59PM (#4233640)
    If you fly under IFR, nothing has changed


    Try landing at one of the four airports in the DC area.

    It is true that IFR was not as adversely affected, but there was still a significant impact. It was about a week before they even allowed IFR flight for part 91, as I recall. IFR flight without the option of VFR is much more restrictive, especially if you frequent uncontrolled airports and even moreso airports without approaches. Maintaining or, even worse, regaining instrument currency was difficult, too.

    Even when departing IFR there was a period of time when I could not drive my car on to the ramp. I had to go to the FBO, prove to them who I was, then have them take me out to my plane in one of their vehicles. Then after landing I had to call them to reverse the process. And owner maintenance during that time? Forget it! Even as recently as two months ago when my partner and I were working on the engine late at night we got questioned by the local authorities. I'm actually glad to see that, but it is another indicator that things have really changed.

    Things are mostly okay these days, but we do still live under the constant threat of increased restrictions (witness all the hoopla over the part 91 restrictions for 9/11/02) and increased security with little to no warning. Not to mention the press regularly publishing reports about how "dangerous" we are, and senators saying that GA is a gaping security risk.

    if you can't spot the cooling tower of a nuclear power plant from 5 miles away, I don't want you in the same airpace with me.


    Ha ha! Fortunately I can (for the most part). But we still had to pad the distance to about 10 miles, in case some official somewhere decided that the center of the circle was somewhere other than the cooling tower.

    I would submit that general aviation has boomed since 911.

    Parts of it have, yes. Especially chartered jet operations. But the part of the industry that deals with our small planes is still suffering greatly, IME. Ive talked with maintenance shops, paint shops, and interior shops. All report that business is still down but slowly improving.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @09:07PM (#4233703)
    One of the basic underpinnings of a working society is that it is easy to kill someone. Yes, re-read that -- a certain amount of trust has to be put into other people for a society to work. Your neighbor could easily kill you and your whole family every moening of every day. You need to pat him down and confiscate his nail clippers to?
  • by achurch ( 201270 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @09:56PM (#4234031) Homepage

    I'm not a pilot myself--far from it--but one of my most thrilling experiences in an airplane was when I rode [airline censored to protect the innocent] once; I expressed interest in "how the thing works" (kids, don't try this at home) and the pilots actually let me into the cockpit! I got to look out the front window, look at the instrument panels, chat with the pilots . . . it was great. I actually thought about taking flying lessons for a while.

    Sigh.

  • Re:9/11...So What? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by frrank the crank ( 185421 ) on Tuesday September 10, 2002 @11:10PM (#4234439) Homepage
    Im 43 years old, my Dad is 75, the only people who have passed laws in the US limiting my freedoms are do-gooder liberals that have no made it crime to speak and think what you will (hate crimes, and they only apply to white people) my property rights - they can take from me at will and build a parking lot on it in the name of "community"- they can also tell me what i may or may not build on it, grow on it , etc.

    They decide what moral lessons my children will learn (not anymore though, they are in private schools)they decide who I MUST commune with, they destroy property values by condeming property and building "low income housing" on it, then moving a bunch of free loaders in.

    They have passed laws effectively removing the natural right to protect my home and property by declaring it a no loss situation because i have insurance. They tax me at ten times the rate of other people simply because I'm smart enough to know how to make money. they'll tax me when Im dead on money they taxed while I was alive so they can "even out' the balance between me and some moron who won't get out of bed in the morning, oh yeah, love those democrats of the farmer/labor party -

    Hell, it is no ILLEGAL to pick up a rock in a National Park, and the list goes on and on forever. But if your a poor victim "of the state" we'll let you out of Jail early and then you can go and rape/murder another child somewhere.
  • by HillBilly ( 120575 ) on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @12:20AM (#4234774)
    The best part after all the checks and searches is eating your inflight meal with metal knives and forks provided by the airline.

    Although I did get plastic cuttlery on one airline, even they could do a fair amount of damage.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @12:33AM (#4234820)
    At the risk of crying 'me too!' ....

    I'm a VFR pilot and my flying has been GREATLY affected. I got my license about 1 month before september 11th. My parents and grandparents were flying into town on sept. 29th specifically to go flying with me for their first time. However, I lived in Atlanta at the time and all VFR flights were grounded for like a month. So my family canceled the trip since we couldn't go up. Honestly, I was surprised that I still had an FBO to go back to when the ban was lifted. Alot of FBO's just folded. As expensive as aviation is, it's even more expensive when the planes aren't flying. W/O the student/rental income, alot of plane owners couldn't hack it.

    Most of my flying was to Chattanooga to visit my girlfriends parents. Unfortunately, the field we flew into was right next to a Nuclear Power Plant. So even when we could fly again, we still couldn't go to the one place that we really wanted to go.

    And guess which sect of aviation is the smallest threat to the general public? That's right. Light aircraft. What happened to that bonehead that flew the cessna that he 'stole' (yeah right) and flew into a building in Miami? He was the only casualty, the building had a few broken windows and the plane was dissintegrated. Who needs more proof that our planes aren't threatening? Yet, it seems every week, there's a new temporary flight restriction around an entire city, or over nukes, or over open air events, or whatever (despite the fact that it's been proven that small private planes can't do a damn thing to nukes). Why is it that VFR GA has changed SOOOOOOO much but commercial aviation has changed so little. If you're going to be paranoid, at least be paranoid about the relevant stuff.
  • Privacy (Score:2, Interesting)

    by oakbox ( 414095 ) on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @01:59AM (#4235109) Homepage
    It's made me actually figure out, and start using, PGP. Before the recent spate of laws, I was quite content to rely on just being boring to preserve my privacy. But now with so much more money available for intrusive government tapping and much less regulation to stop them, I am being more proactive with guarding my private life.
    In this small way, the terrorists have succeeded, I have less freedom and I trust my own government less.

  • Copyright laws (Score:2, Interesting)

    by vekotin ( 535759 ) <vekotin@vekotin . o rg> on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @04:35AM (#4235515) Homepage
    It seems even here around EU that they're using 9/11 as an excuse to alter something as far fetched as copyright laws.

    And how do they do this? By claiming that money from production of pirated cd's and dvd's benefits international terrorism. That might be but I fail to see how true their claims can be that trading media files off the Internet can support terrorism...

    I don't mind people selling pirated cd's to get a painful kick in the rear end, but the nice professional people seem to agree that importing audio/video media from outside Europe is also piracy, even if they're very legitimate products(region code breaking is evil etc.). And all forms of piracy, including this can support terrorism. I somehow have a hard time believing that importing a region 1 dvd to europe causes any financial gain to any terrorists. But hey, those politicians do this to protect us, let's not question them at such a difficult time.

    Bottom line: whenever the lawmakers say "to fight terrorism", they can do pretty much anything, even when it has absolutely nothing to do with the matter.

  • Flying (UK) (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Mr_Silver ( 213637 ) on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @05:52AM (#4235712)
    How has it changed me? Well, after 9/11 airports realised that they had to tighten up security to a point where it was actually half-way decent.

    To do this would cost money that they weren't prepared to cough up.

    So they levied a 7 UKP "security charge" on all flights, this money would then be used to beef up security and not etch into their precious profits.

    Unfortunately, despite everyone coughing up this extra money people still managed to get on planes with bombs in their shoes [bbc.co.uk] and cannisters full of petrol [bbc.co.uk].

    Obviously they're using our money well.

  • by testadicazzo ( 567430 ) on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @05:58AM (#4235729) Homepage
    I've listed all the effects to my family in the states before. What they really wind up doing is killing my freedom of speech. I don't feel comfortable being politically vocal and living in America at the same time. The two big things that terrify me are: I can be held without a trial indefinately if I'm suspected of being a terrorist, and the complacent, bloodthirsty, jingoistic, my country right or wrong (well more to the point, my country can't be wrong) attitude the American public seems to have (based on what I see on the TV, which I hope is hopelessly biased).

    Why? Well back when I was 20 I was in the Marines, and I was against the gulf war. I was pretty vocal about it (freedom of speech) and that got me a lot of flack from the military (that's clear). I got in a discussion with some other guys during lunch and they were telling me "we gotta kill S.H. because he violated this and this international law, yadda yadda". I told them if we were going to kill violaters of international law, we would have to start with Bush for Panama. Clearly a rhetorical argument.

    Still, the Secret service was called, and I spent the night in a holding cell until my lawer came. I had to be photographed, psychoanalyzed, get a handwriting analyses, and had my background and family checked. But they had to let me go, becuase I was able to talk to a lawyer and he said "c'mon guys, it's obvious these charges are a bunch of shit". That happened a lot in those days, me getting arrested for a day and released without trial because the charges were just meaningless. They did this to hassle me and to keep me from expressing my opinion to people who might listen and change theirs. Noboddy, and I emphasize, Nobody, really thought I had threatened the presidents life. It was just a charade.

    What's changed? Now they don't have to let me speak with my lawyer, and they can keep me indefinately. That has terrorized me!

  • by MelloHippo ( 607765 ) on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @07:20AM (#4235918)
    Check out the NY Times Op-Ed column from Sept. 10, 2002, by the Economist Paul Krugman. You have to log in, but it's free... http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/10/opinion/10KRUG.h tml This guy has a pair of big brass balls...
  • by Badanov ( 518690 ) on Wednesday September 11, 2002 @08:52AM (#4236254) Homepage Journal
    Profiling does work. El Al has been doing profiling for 20 years and they haven't had a highjacking during that time. When cops profile for drugs they increase their chances of catching someone with drugs. Racist or not, profiling works and as it is now our transport security service does random searches. because of that I do not feel safe.

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...