Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy

An interview with Ad-Aware's Nicholas Stark 199

Andrew Leonard writes: "In the wake of the Ad-Aware/RadLight spyware vs. anti-spyware showdown, Salon has an interview with Ad-Aware's Nicholas Stark, who explains in no uncertain terms Lavasoft's determination to match every move by the spyware developers."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

An interview with Ad-Aware's Nicholas Stark

Comments Filter:
  • by mgblst ( 80109 ) on Sunday April 28, 2002 @05:18AM (#3423960) Homepage
    We do offer an enhanced version of Ad-Aware called Ad-Aware Plus, [which costs $15]. But money is not the primary goal and has never been; it's mainly used to pay the server and bandwidth costs. We all have "regular" jobs or are students, and do this in our spare time (although it uses up a lot).

    Perhaps if they included some sort of advertising program with ad-aware, they could make some real money!
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 28, 2002 @05:20AM (#3423964)
    I'd LOVE to see some puckish programmer bury a phrase at the very bottom of a click-through license to the effect of: "User agrees to sell nude pictures of themselves on ebay and donate the procedes to RJ Reynolds and/or the Church of Scientology." Might demonstrate the idiocy of click-throughs and highlight their dubious legal status. At worst, it'd provide a few yuks.
  • by Roarkk ( 303058 ) on Sunday April 28, 2002 @05:21AM (#3423967) Homepage Journal

    As I believe that some of the "spyware" are just regular legal programs I really feel for their authors to see how their program is being uninstalled," RadScorpion wrote. "I WANTED ADAWARE TO SEE IT TOO and to revalue their pose to their 'enemies.'

    No, I feel really bad. If it weren't for AdAware, I, too, could have received an extra $500 from (Insert online casino of choice).

    *$500 dollar offer only valid after betting $50,000 or more and receipt of firstborn child. Other restrictions may apply

  • by NoMoreNicksLeft ( 516230 ) <john.oylerNO@SPAMcomcast.net> on Sunday April 28, 2002 @05:36AM (#3423993) Journal
    "But to actively take income from people simply because you don't approve of their business model is heinous."

    You're right, I'll write my state representatves this instant, and insist that they repeal fines for drug dealers. Throw them in jail, yes, but taking money because I don't approve of their business model is truly heinous.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 28, 2002 @05:36AM (#3423994)
    "B-12."

    "Miss! D-11."

    "Hit! C-3."

    "Miss! D-12."

    "Hit! Dang! You sank my business model!"

    Guess they now know how RIAA and MPAA feel about their file sharing software... ;^).
  • by fatphil ( 181876 ) on Sunday April 28, 2002 @06:14AM (#3424040) Homepage
    Following up to a post with the sig:
    "Alchohol, cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" -Homer Simpson

    You wrote:
    "all we need now is someone pissed enough to take this damn company to court."

    Which is just wonderful in English! (i.e. English English)

    It's certainly true, it would be very interesting for this to be brought to a black/white crux point.

    FP.
  • by Technician ( 215283 ) on Sunday April 28, 2002 @08:11AM (#3424172)
    pictures of themselves on ebay and donate the procedes...
    With my geek physique, they shouldn't hold their breath waiting for the funds.

So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand

Working...