Patent Granted on Sideways Swinging 508
Matt Van Gundy writes "In another brilliant move by the well loved U.S. Patent and Trademark Office a patent (6,368,227) has been granted to a Mr. Steven Olson for inventing the method of swinging sideways on a swing. The patent even lays claim to "inducing a component of forward and back motion into the swinging motion, resulting in a swinging path that is generally shaped as an oval." I claim prior art, but perhaps I am one of the few fortunate ones who enjoyed this method of swinging long before its 'invention' by Mr. Steven Olson. " My favorite line from the patent : "The user may even choose to produce a Tarzan-type yell while swinging in the manner described, which more
accurately replicates swinging on vines in a dense jungle forest. Actual jungle forestry is not required."
Wow (Score:1, Funny)
Interesting... (Score:4, Funny)
Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:5, Funny)
Don't go saying that there's prior art or that it's such an obvious invention. Where is your prior art? Can you prove that the idea is obvious?
I didn't think so. This patent stands.
Good thing (Score:1, Funny)
hey maybe i could go patent the rope/tire method and become a millionaire!
Sideways Swingers? (Score:2, Funny)
Playgrounds are still safe ... (Score:2, Funny)
Cease and Desist Notice (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:2, Funny)
1. A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.
2. A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.
3. The use of sarcasm. See Synonyms at wit1.
Mastermind (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe the agent posseses a sense of humor and an apreciation for irony that has slowly twisted his mind over the years. It started simply. A inane little patent. Won't hurt anything. But it was darned funny. And nobody caught it. So he upped the stakes with another gem. Unnoticed. And another. And another. The beancounter souless zombies that are his coworkers oblivious to the parade of delicious irony under their noses, presented by inane claims, burried in a sea of paperwork. Taunting him. Daring him. Just a little more. They'll appreciate his humor. If he just found one obvious enough.
Maybe our mastermind is actually an activist. Working from the inside. Sabotaging the system. Poisoning the dignity of the entire USPTO system with more and more outlandish patent grants. Daring the public to see the USPTO for the foolishness that it really is. They'll apreciate how foolish it all is. If he just made it obvious enough.
Or maybe there is no mastermind. We are simply witnessing the byproduct of a reality distortion only known to exist within the proximity of US Governmental beurocracy and Steve Jobs.
So many posibilities. And we've only just began to scratch the surface...
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:3, Funny)
With all those sex sites on the net, you'll make much more money licensing the technology of using porn to cause arousal. While nose picking may be just as common as masturbation, there is way more money in the latter.
Besides, think of the lawsuits from Kleenex if you're invention catches on and results in a drop in tissue sales.
Oh dear... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:if i were a patent lawyer (Score:4, Funny)
To hell with that chair crap... my application is in the mail for a patent destined to make me richer than [name your deity]. Yessireebob, billions upon billions of people will pay me royalties, some even dozens of times per month.
I won't disclose too much, but it has to do with "manufacturing processes". In a nutshell, it involves a method of inserting and removing a cylindrical device in and out of a round opening in a rhythmic fashion. Provisions are built in for proper device lubrication, and the entire assembly (including fuel) is completely organic in nature. I'm gonna be freaking billionaire...
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:3, Funny)
Read it a little more closely:
Sorry, I think you're gonna have to pay up...
Re:Wrong topic. (Score:1, Funny)
Yes. It's the kid's Dad. He's just getting his kid started early in life. I'll bet he's on the playground right now twisting the arms of all his little friends to pay royalties, or get off the swing.
Uh-Oh! Copyright Infringement! (Score:2, Funny)
If they don't get a C&D from one [tarzan.org], they'll be hearing from another [cbfan.com].
Not a mad idea.. (Score:5, Funny)
So does this mean the Patent Office now implicitly agrees that they think patents are silly, too?
That just gave me an idea, issue a patent for approval that patents the process of patenting silly things.
Either they will have to find prior art (there are tons but I doubt they have the balls to point them out), or grant the patent.
And if they grant the patent, you can collect fees from anyone who 'infringes' on your invention.
Voila, no more silly patents.
patenting a method of ...... (Score:4, Funny)
Let's see if that gets past them..
Twisting the ropes? (Score:2, Funny)
(Thereby inducing dizzyness)
And if not, should we club together and get this one? Might make a fortune
Re:Moderation changes. (Score:3, Funny)
Curses! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:5, Funny)
This is my 1000th post! w00t!
Re:Default should be deny. (Score:2, Funny)
There's no date on it, but I bet there is a printed copy that pre-dates Nov 2000.
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:4, Funny)
I'm sorry, but there's no justification for tissue piracy!
oh, great.... (Score:2, Funny)
"w00t! f1rst p4nt3nt!"
This is why we need patents (Score:4, Funny)
Without the protection of a monopoly on their methods, children would not have a sufficient incentive to play. Imagine a world where the children do not play. That would be aweful. You don't hate children, do you?
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:2, Funny)
Please use trademark names properly to reduce trademark dilution. From now on, it's "Kleenex (R) brand facial tissues".
Sincerely,
Kimberly-Clark(R) Corporation
(R) Registered trademark of Kimberly-Clark Corporation (C) 1938, 1986, 2000 KCC. All rights reserved
Re:Sure, it's obvious. Now. (Score:5, Funny)
Hey Junior, that's Gonna Cost Ya (Score:2, Funny)
"Boy, 8 years of age, sent to prison for 30 years to life, for infringing on patent for the third time."
"Six year old girl agrees to pay two gummy bears, one red, one green, to settle patent infringement claims..."
Re:if i were a patent lawyer (Score:5, Funny)
The saddest thing here is the (low) number of people reading your post that could actually claim "prior art" on this one..