Sites Wary of Adopting P3P 154
technogamy writes: "CNN is reporting on the industry's take on P3P, the W3C's Platform for Privacy Preferences.According to the article, the W3C is expected by April to formally adopt P3P -- of course, as many of you are aware, Microsoft's IE6 already includes an implementation of the client side of P3P. 'Because Microsoft's browser checks for P3P, sites risk getting flagged if they don't adopt it.' P3Pizing (or 'pethripizing') a complex site can evolve into a Herculean task...! (See also EPIC's critique of P3P.)"
Damn (Score:1, Informative)
Mozilla (Score:1, Informative)
The problem with P3P is... (Score:2, Informative)
simple XML-File that tells the User what (personal) data the Website
collects, and is Requested with "hard-coded" relative URL's.
Assume a PHP Website with URL-based Session's. A User Request the Homepage
(/index.phtml) - he's anonymous, collected data is anonymous. The (static)
P3P File tells the User that the collected data is anon. Well, now the User
logs-in via a Form-Submit and reloads the Page (/index.phtml). The
information is set in the PHP-Session, the User is shown other
(personalized) Content, but the P3P-File is still the same, telling the
user, that the collected data is still anonymous - this is (or may be) wrong
now.
P3P has no mechanism to handle this case, in P3P you can only set a
different policy for (sub-)folders (differrent URI's). The problem is, that
the GET Request is absolutely the same, it doesn't matter if the user is
logged-in or anonymous (well, it would be a security hole, if someone is
able to find out, if a user is logged-in when (s)he takes a look at the URL,
hm?).
Sure, it's possible to copy all "templates" to another subfolder and link
logged-in users to this one, but why should I do so? The advantage of using
templates (a I define them) is that they just show any content. They don't
care if this content is personalized or not. The content is "prepared" by
the "business logic" - programmed in PHP - and stored in a database. This
way, I'm able to use the same "templates" for logged-in and anonymous
users - well, half the work to do...
Re:this shows the hidden costs of monopolies (Score:1, Informative)
Join P3PSI (Score:3, Informative)
When will Slashdot become P3P complaint?
You might want to start a P3P Slashdot Initiative. Tell those in charge that you won't subscribe until Slashdot implements P3P, a W3C Proposed Recommendation [w3.org]. You can even call it P3PSI (pronounced PEP-see).
Re:The problem with P3P is... (Score:4, Informative)
"in P3P you can only set a different policy for (sub-)folders (differrent URI's)"
Uhm, no, you can specify policies for URI's, methods (GET/POST/PUT/DELETE etc) and cookies (including name, value, domain and even content).
For example:
<POLICY-REF about="/P3P/UserPolicy.xml"><COOKIE-INCLUDE name="loggedin" value="*" domain="*" path="*"/>
</POLICY-REF>
If you really can't describe your case:
And, of course, talk to the peeps on the P3P ml [mailto] and see if you can get it fixed in version 2.
I've implemented this, and use it day-to-day. (Score:4, Informative)
At it's most basic P3P just a header being looked at by a http user agent which has a P3P agent built in. I believe to date it's only I.E. 6.0. Though Mozilla, Opera, Galeon, and Konquerer are sure to follow.
Many aspects of P3P are positive, but there are parts of the specification which have yet to be properly determined and implemented, in a real-world environment.
The main parts affected would be any "Third-party" though any "First-party" running a site and issuing cookies of any unacceptable fashion, mainly things which are PII related and cannot be opted out of, will be flagged.
. In short, be sure you have an opt-out mechanism for your shoppers if you're an e-commerce site.
Also, any "Third-party" acting as an "Agent" on behalf of any "First-party" which is issuing cookies or collecting data, regardless if PII is involved. The spec for being a "Third-party Agent" has yet to actually be implemented by anyone, though I know some people who will try this soon. Up to this point, the view of "Third-party Agent" is quite desireable to anyone on the 'net who operates in such a manner. It nearly absolves them of "having" to deal with any consumer related issues regarding their data collection because you can point people back to the "First-party's" P3P policy, rather than having to maintain your own.
The obvious problem here though, is scalability and maintainability. It's tantamount to remote key-managment. You must then manage your "First-party" client's P3P Policies and keep in contact/communication with them to ensure that any changes are propagated to you, should it change, yet you continue to serve an *out of date* P3P Compact Policy in the web server's headers for that client, you very well could be blamed for screwing the data they hired you to collect for them in a very bad way.
Aside from that, P3P is a very positive thing for consumers and business persons in such a way that it opens a channel of communication which did not exist so much in the foreground, as P3P enables, before. Hope this is useful to anyone trying to understand some of what P3P really is.
Re:Simple solutions (Score:2, Informative)
result, it thinks you respect privacy, you get to do what you want *and* your P3P privacy statement is actually honest.
what the US needs is the EU data protection act.
Re:Am I the only one who has a problem with this? (Score:3, Informative)
Making a p3p profile isn't that hard ... (Score:0, Informative)
P3Pizing (or 'pethripizing') a complex site can evolve into a Herculean task...!
How is this so difficult?
I converted my companies privacy policy (quite detailed) to the needed p3p files using the tool IBM has available [ibm.com] in under 2 hours with no prior experience.
The concept isn't that hard to understand, am I missing something that would make this so hard or time consuming to do?
OECD Privacy Policy Generator (Score:3, Informative)
PS. OECD = Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development [oecd.org]. According to their site they are "an international organisation helping governments tackle the economic, social and governance challenges of a globalised economy."