German State Alters DNS To Censor Web Sites [updated] 261
Rabenwolf writes: "In the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia, the first ISP (ISIS Multimedia) has given in to pressure from the state government and has started to block foreign websites with supposedly "illegal content" by changing the corresponding DNS entries. ISIS customers trying to access these sites are redirected to the website of the local government. ISPs in North Rhine-Westphalia will have to pay a fine if they continue to provide access to sites with "illegal content" through their DNS servers. It's not as bad as China or Saudi-Arabia, but it makes you think... An article from the heise newsticker is here, and if you don't sprechen Deutsch, Google might help." Update: 11/22 15:23 GMT by T : As sqrt points out, this report is misleading: "A single technican altered the DNS Entries to demonstrate it is possible. His changes were already reversed. Heise already posted a new story about this today."
Well.. (Score:2, Informative)
Pathetic attempt (Score:5, Informative)
(This would not work with sites that rely on HTTP1.1 to tell them the name of the site, so that many sites can be hosted on a single IP, but that is less widely used than it might be.)
Site-Restriction Already retracted (Score:5, Informative)
Re:IP addresses? (Score:3, Informative)
Well, this one little thing: Virtual hosts... If there's multiple DNS names pointing on same server, the server hicups if it sees someone wanting just the page and not providing the host name in Host: header.
Re:Site-Restriction Already retracted (Score:2, Informative)
List of blocked sites. (Score:5, Informative)
Sites NOT blocked anymore (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Site-Restriction Already retracted (Score:3, Informative)
Results of Babelfish on the Heise article:
Ah, good old machine translation. Yet, it's still Better than Nothing. "force-wonderful-ends" :)
It gets worse (Score:5, Informative)
The statement is here: Pressemitteilung 467/2001 der Bezirksregierung Düsseldorf vom 22.11.2001 [bezreg-due...orf.nrw.de]
Re:Site-Restriction Already retracted (Score:3, Informative)
Against the German constitution? (Score:3, Informative)
I'm an American, not a German, but I thought that Germany's constitution forbade this. In particular, quoting from Article 5:
Or, in English:
Could someone who is German or who has studied German law please clarify?
Re:Against the German constitution? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Will this teach slashdot editors? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:IP addresses? (Score:3, Informative)
Well, two little things (one for *nix, one for windows nt):
$cientology disk defragmenter in Windows (Score:1, Informative)
http://cisar.org/991203a.htm
Regarding M$ capitulation and offering to remove the code (the only time M$ has ever provided a patch to REMOVE a piece of software): http://www.zdnet.com/windows/stories/main/0,4728,
A recent issue of c't indicated that the disk fragmenter has silently been re-incorporated into Windows XP. Sorry, can't find a link.
Watch your back.
Human translation (Score:1, Informative)
Please note that this is not the latest news. Isis has removed the blocking, stating that it was installed by a technical staff member without consulting the management.
First Blocking of Web Sites in NRW
In North Rhine-Westphalia, a first internet provider has started blocking certain web sites with alleged right-wing extremist content. Isis Multimedia Net, a provider located in Düsseldorf, already changed the respective DNS entries on monday. Isis customers now find themselves on a web site of Düsseldorf's district government when entering one of the addresses in question.
The basis for this is a request by the district goverment sent to all access providers of the federal state, asking for the blocking of certain foreign web sites with illegal content. An Isis spokesperson explained the blocking was performed due to being threatened by a fine. The goverment had informed them about the illegal content, so now they were required to act.
The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) opposed "censoring" the internet. "The massive restrictions for the citizens in execising their free speech rights are unacceptable," said CCC spokesperson Jens Ohlig.
The authorities had invited various providers on November 13 to dicuss technical details of blocking internet content. In this hearing, the content providers questioned the possibility of an effective blocking of unpleasent web sites hosted abroad. The participants finally agreed to discuss technical possibilities in a special interest group.
Re:Pathetic attempt (Score:2, Informative)
Also, you can put the IP address in the hosts file; then, everything will work fine. Or just run your own DNS daemon locally (djbdns [cr.yp.to] is good for this), which is easy on *nix platforms, and you won't even notice the site being "censored" :-)
Of course, if too many people do this, the govt might grow a brain and try a more effect means of censorship; on the plus side, one-way air tickets are quite cheap these days...
Re:Against the German constitution? (Score:2, Informative)
(2) These rights are limited by the provisions of the general laws, the provisions of law for the protection of youth and by the right to inviolability of personal honor.
Just as in other countries, the constitutional court will decide (if called) if this specific law is unconstitutional. They upheld Art. 5 a few years ago when someone used a very short quote ('Soldiers are murderers') of a longer text (Der bewachte Kriegsschauplatz [uni-ulm.de]), to raise sentiments against the NATO armed forces.
Re:Against the German constitution? (Score:2, Informative)
(2) Diese Rechte finden ihre Schranken in den Vorschriften der allgemeinen Gesetze, den gesetzlichen Bestimmungen zum Schutze der Jugend und in dem Recht der persönlichen Ehre.
This translates as:
(2) These rights are restricted by general laws, legal regulations concerning the protection of the youth and by the right of personal honour.
I am neither a lawyer nor German, but I guess there are German laws that somewhat restrict the distribution of Nazi ideology.
ISIS is blocking again. (Score:2, Informative)