Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

XM Radio Pulls PC Hardware

Posted by timothy on Mon Aug 30, 2004 10:41 PM
from the kill-golden-geese-quickly dept.
Didion Sprague writes "News.com is reporting that XM has decided to "quietly discontinue" the XMPCR -- a tiny USB satellite radio receiver for XM radio. Slashdot readers may remember last week's story about TimeTrax -- homebrewed software that allows XMPCR users to automatically record and tag each song. Now, XMPCR receivers are going for almost $400 on ebay. The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't "behind the discontinuation of the PCR"."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
XM Radio Pulls PC Hardware | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 265 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Make them change their mind (Score:5, Insightful)

    by eric76 (679787) <eric@gruver.net> on Monday August 30 2004, @10:43PM (#10114807)
    If enough people over a period of time asked if they could hook it up to their computer and decided not to buy when they say no, maybe they would rethink their decision.
    • Re:Make them change their mind by FlutterVertigo(gmail (Score:1) Monday August 30 2004, @11:50PM
    • Re:Make them change their mind by mutewinter (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:02AM
    • Re:Make them change their mind by boisepunk (Score:3) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:26AM
    • Posting at the top.... (Score:4, Informative)

      by FlutterVertigo(gmail (800106) on Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:43AM (#10115410)
      ...so it's available to everyone who doesn't scroll down to read everything.

      Has everyone forgotten the other two members of the triumvirate for finding things geek?
      (eBay, PriceWatch, Froogle).

      As I note in a later message, there are completed eBay auctions in the previous five days or so via Buy It Now! for $29.99, $29.99, $40. That's less than what everyone's discussing.
      PriceWatch has nothing listed - just remember it for future use.
      Froogle, which everyone seems to overlook, seems to have an interesting outlook on XMPCR [google.com].

      Just remember:
      ________________________________________
      My Trunk Monkey can beat up your Trunk Monkey.
      http://www.suburbanautogroup.com/ford/trunkmonkey. html
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Make them change their mind by linuxtelephony (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @08:41AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Bloody shame they were pressured... (Score:5, Informative)

    by VinceWuzHere (733075) * on Monday August 30 2004, @10:43PM (#10114808)
    Bloody shame, IMHO IANAL that they felt pressured to kill the product line and avoid any issues with the RIAA. Next news flash will be that the RIAA has pressured music stores to stop selling CDs and avoid "any needless distribution of our highly overprotected music".

    But here's the part that gets me... from the Product Information Page http://www.xmradio.com/xmpcr...

    "XM PCR Developer Communities:

    The XM PCR revolution is in full effect. Across the XM Nation, we're excited to see independent developers creating fantastic new versions of the XM PCR software for a wide range of platforms including Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows. Windows: XtreMe PCR

    Macintosh OS X: MacXM

    Unix: XMPCR perl scripts

    Linux: xmd-xmfe

    Did we miss a developer? Let us know if you're developing any PCR software."

    Heh. Looks like they missed TimeTrax.

  • Ebay (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 30 2004, @10:43PM (#10114813)
    Who else thinks that the seller of that ebay item *may* have had something to do with this post?
  • Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ackthpt (218170) * on Monday August 30 2004, @10:46PM (#10114829)
    (http://www.dragonswest.com/ | Last Journal: Monday November 05, @07:35PM)
    homebrewed software that allows XMPCR users to automatically record and tag each song.

    I always assumed this was why DJ's talked over the intro to tunes, to mess up anyone recording, lord knows they could save their breath because who cares what DJ's have to say when your tune starts to play (you actually want them to shut the fsck up!)

    • Re: Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by Black Parrot (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:26PM
    • Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by BiggerIsBetter (Score:3) Monday August 30 2004, @11:36PM
      • Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! (Score:5, Interesting)

        by LostCluster (625375) * on Monday August 30 2004, @11:47PM (#10115179)
        Radio stations have always desired to "watermark" their feeds for various reasons which include:

        - A brand identity
        - Making sure diary-keeping listeners know and remember which station they are listening to
        - Making sure anything recorded is clear what station was recorded
        - Making sure that if the competition grabs a song from their air, they get an unclean copy that they can't use.
        - Complying with publisher requests to protect new content.

        "Clean" recordings are what you usually have to pay for. Any form of broadcast is expected to have some bit of interference either by signal technology, DJs doing their intro thing, or intentional mucking. Pure digital streams have to do more mucking than usual because their delivery system is so clean.
        [ Parent ]
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • No bids? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DJ-Dodger (169589) on Monday August 30 2004, @10:48PM (#10114838)
    (http://dodgersden.com/)
    Can you really call it "going for almost $400" if nobody has actually bid on the item? Sounds more like "profiteers are trying get ridiculous prices like $400"
  • OK that does it. (Score:5, Funny)

    by cmacb (547347) on Monday August 30 2004, @10:48PM (#10114840)
    (http://blog.macb.net/ | Last Journal: Monday March 05 2007, @04:38PM)
    I'm canceling my XM account.

    And um... It had nothing to do with this, or any other screw-ups with XM programming.
  • What the heck (Score:5, Interesting)

    I don't get what the fuss is all about... So, it let you download songs? Who's in it's right mind is gonna pay 400$ for a crappy radio that let me download songs? Hello? P2P? If you want to get (illegally) free songs, at least do it for FREE? :)
    • Re:What the heck (Score:4, Interesting)

      by huchida (764848) on Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:02AM (#10115250)
      I don't get what the fuss is all about... So, it let you download songs? Who's in it's right mind is gonna pay 400$ for a crappy radio that let me download songs? Hello? P2P? If you want to get (illegally) free songs, at least do it for FREE? :)

      I'm not sure it's illegal. It's akin to taping off the radio, not sharing via P2P. In any event you're not broadcasting your IP when you'e doing it so there's little chance of getting caught.

      It's definitely not worth $400. But it might be worth $40 to me, if I had XM anyway. Find a channel (type of music) you like, tape it all day, come home to a neat little stack of songs to wade through...

      [ Parent ]
    • Here is how to do it for free. by Anonymous Coward (Score:3) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:30AM
    • Re:What the heck by karmatic (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @01:21AM
    • Re:What the heck by Caraig (Score:3) Tuesday August 31 2004, @02:25AM
    • Re:What the heck by linx4prs (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:42PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • How much? (Score:5, Funny)

    by jm92956n (758515) on Monday August 30 2004, @10:49PM (#10114851)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday August 17 2004, @10:31PM)
    How much will it cost me to have my ebay link posted on the front page? Sure, you can find just about any sucker to buy a product if you show it to enough people; while it may take time, eventually you'll find either a person with too much money, or a person who lacks the ability to comprehend the value of money.

    It's "going" for $400 right now, yet there isn't a single bid.
    • Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:37AM
  • pay service (Score:4, Insightful)

    by chuckfucter (703084) on Monday August 30 2004, @10:49PM (#10114853)
    (http://www.chuckfucter.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday October 26 2006, @12:58PM)
    Isn't this kinda pointless, customers are paying for this service, it's like hooking up a vcr or tivo to your cable/satellite box and recording your shows (except the software tags the songs for you) I would think this would be a good thing for their service, that is, unless the RIAA asked them too (yea, yea I read the article)
  • RIAA (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Zorilla (791636) on Monday August 30 2004, @10:49PM (#10114855)
    The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't "behind the discontinuation of the PCR"

    Well, maybe not directly, but from XM's perpective, the possible threat of the RIAA coming to get them sure did.
  • hmm... (Score:4, Funny)

    XMPCR? Couldn't they have come up with a catchier name like DRMXM2PCUSBABCDEFG.
    • Re:hmm... by JiffyJeff (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @04:12AM
    • Re:hmm... by Alsee (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @04:41AM
  • XM Module (Score:5, Informative)

    First of all, XM are complete pieces of shit for doing this. The XMPCR was the only reason I even bought into satellite radio service in the first place. I use the XM-PCR on my Car PC and listen to it for hours every day.

    It's worth noting, though, that the XMPCR is a pretty simple device. It would be incredibly easy to build a DIY one out of any XM radio. Here's why:

    XM sells a receiver module to radio manufacturers. Essentially the satellite part of the radio hardware is made by XM and is the same on all units. This module exposes a serial interface (9600 baud TTL level) for control and it outputs digital audio (I forget what format). It's powered on 5V (or 3.3V -- i forget)

    Anyway, all the XMPCR has in it is a simple power supply circuit, a USB/Serial converter, a DAC and an antenna jack. All you would have to do to make your own is take the tuner module out of an existing radio and wire it up the same way. You could even use the same USB/Serial converter to make it 100% identical to the regular XMPCR. The serial number (used for activation and whatnot) can be queried out of the module with a command (or taken off the donor radio's label of course).
    • Re:XM Module (Score:5, Interesting)

      i agree

      i had xm in my car through my pioneer deck and an addon xm receiver. i loved it so much, i couldn't wait to get something for my home computer (i've got a car pc here too, by chance). i could have bought some component, but the xmpcr was small, cheap, and worked

      plus, it is a very hacker friendly device. xm chose a well-supported by oss usb/serial adapter. they didn't have to. maybe they chose it by price ... either way, they chose one that's well supported. there are now plenty of apps out there available to do lots of cool stuff. they even promoted some of the bigger ones (a mac player, etc). some people even modded theirs to get digital output. being able to do that is just damn cool

      i now hope they don't start playing the directtv game and start turning off current xmpcr subscribers. that would make them complete pieces of shit to the second power
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:XM Module (Score:5, Interesting)

        A car pc, do you say? Do you happen to use this program:

        http://www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?p =1 25414

        I only ask because I wrote it :) I was very excited at the end of last year when XM was really getting into supporting the XMPCR hackers. We were all very nervous that they would turn on us, but they very suprisingly did the opposite. It's highly unfortunate that they seem to have changed their tune.

        Another poster mentioned that the SkyFi 2 radio that is supposedly forthcoming is rumored to have a USB port and be computer controllable. If they are canning the XMPCR for this, then I can't say that I really blame them. Delphi makes the SkyFi and XM probably doesn't want to hurt sales of a new radio by offering a product with similar functionality for a lot less money (ie why would you buy a $150 skyfi2 for your computer when you could buy a $50 xmpcr?) XM makes the money from selilng the module to delphi anyway, so it's not like they are making any less money stopping the distribution of the PCR.

        Now here's a tangent ...

        It's also worth noting that if the skyfi 2 USB rumor has truth to it, it might be a good opportunity for them to fix some of the problems with the XMPCR such as the slow (9600bps) communications speed between the radio and the computer. It would also be slick if they added the ability to receive data through the unit - their network is capable of it -- XM weather radios that download and present gobs of data are available, but expensive.

        Something like USB (or bluetooth!) + a data cpable SkyFi 2 + A PocketPC could SIGNIFICANTLY enhande their traffic+weather offerings to provide maps, etc. right alongside the broadcast. As XM are currently fighting a war with local broadcast stations who are trying to prevent them from broadcasting "in their markets", this would certainly give them an edge in the fight, as it would turn XM into a 'weather data' service and not simply a radio broadcast. [To go further aside, this is a battle that I'd really like to see XM win.]
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:XM Module by Triumph The Insult C (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:04AM
    • Re:XM Module (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Fnkmaster (89084) on Monday August 30 2004, @11:12PM (#10114998)
      Yup, I'm pretty certain you'll be seeing XMPCR compatible DIY kits for the Roady or SkyFi units within a month or two. Or an adapter board to sit between your USB or serial port and the XM Direct unit that talks to the headunit in my BMW - again, using a serial protocol of some sort, with a BlitzSafe adapter in the middle.


      XM just needs to suck it up and realize this is the way the game is played. You just have to try to keep it low profile, geek hobbyist only and then tell the RIAA you do not condone or support any such functionality. And let the geeks do their hacking and the rest of the sheeple just won't bother. As long as it requires soldering or breaking open plastic cases, it'll be off the scope and shouldn't attract any more of this RIAA-fodder media attention.


      Thank god all the Tivo hacks never attracted this kind of media frenzy. I've been sucking video off my Series 1 Tivo for several years now, it's just been low profile because it requires a moderate amount of technical know-how to install all the requisite software.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:XM Module (Score:5, Informative)

        by morcheeba (260908) * on Monday August 30 2004, @11:43PM (#10115164)
        (Last Journal: Wednesday August 03 2005, @10:21AM)
        XM is playing the game well, though. I looked into the chipsets that they use, and there is no point to pick off an unencrypted digital compressed signal -- you either get the lossy output that will produce artifacts when re-compressed, or the useless encrypted portion. Good engineering... until someone figures out which wire to probe on the raw IC.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:XM Module (Score:5, Informative)

          by Fnkmaster (89084) on Monday August 30 2004, @11:52PM (#10115203)
          Are you quite sure about that? What about the TOSLink digital adapters that people are using for the XMPCR (see here [myradiostore.us] for the device I'm talking about)? I don't know if the output is lossy and digital or not - frankly, I don't think it matters, it's not like XM transmission quality is really at CD level or anything. If you want CD quality audio, you still need to rip a song off a CD.


          In any case, the difference in quality between the TOSLink digital output and the analog output apparently is only moderate anyway apparently. The point is that this was never about "closing the digital loophole" - there is no meaningful loophole to close here, the stuff people were recording was almost all D to A to D converted anyway. It was just the ease with which the access to the data feed gave to splice and dice and name MP3 files that seems to have caused the brick shitting. LOL, when you think about it, it's quite absurd - they just object to the labor saving aspect here.

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:XM Module by morcheeba (Score:3) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:23AM
        • Re:XM Module by Thomas Shaddack (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @01:47PM
      • Cheaper solution... by rarose (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:24AM
      • Re:XM Module by aberson (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @10:58AM
        • Re:XM Module by Fnkmaster (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @11:14AM
          • Re:XM Module by aberson (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @11:26AM
  • no more howard stern i guess by Triumph The Insult C (Score:1) Monday August 30 2004, @10:53PM
  • Willie Nelson by Zorilla (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @10:55PM
  • IMHO the RIAA made XM discontinue the XMPCR ASAP because it didn't have any DRM, IIRC. Now everything's AOK because it's DOA, too bad though, if you want XM'S XMPCR USB thing you SOL.
  • worth it? by solosaint (Score:1) Monday August 30 2004, @10:57PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • two words: reverse engineer (Score:3, Informative)

    by KingPunk (800195) on Monday August 30 2004, @10:57PM (#10114904)
    i wonder how long it'll take somebody,
    who has the hardware from xm..
    to reverse engineer a better one. and sell the prototype to a competitor or something.
    so that we can once again, continue to be free of restrictions from morons such as the *AA, and now
    most notably the XM-radio service.
    /end rant
  • I see a business opportunity (Score:5, Interesting)

    by gooman (709147) on Monday August 30 2004, @10:59PM (#10114917)
    (Last Journal: Monday November 05, @02:21AM)
    This could be an opportunity for sirius to get into the game and become actual competition. Sometimes its amazing how a niche product can create a halo over an entire product line.

  • by iamhassi (659463) on Monday August 30 2004, @11:00PM (#10114921)
    (Last Journal: Thursday February 16 2006, @06:22PM)
    "In other news, /. editors buy 100,000 XMPCR receivers, publishes story their now worth $400 each and sells them on ebay, retiring as millionaires and outsources /. to India."
  • Already on Hatch's Hit List (Score:5, Interesting)

    by The Importance of (529734) * on Monday August 30 2004, @11:00PM (#10114922)
    (http://www.corante.com/importance/)
    It looks like they pulled the hardware because of the presumed potential for piracy and they might not have had any legal remedies against. However, if the INDUCE Act had been in force, there would have been a law they could have used to outlaw the software. See, Hatch's Hit List #30 - XM Radio to MP3 [corante.com].
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Grrrr.... by al701 (Score:1) Monday August 30 2004, @11:01PM
    • Re:Grrrr.... by Creepy Crawler (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:08AM
      • Re:Grrrr.... by al701 (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @07:44AM
  • Web-based coming (Score:5, Informative)

    by SparklingClearWit (792141) on Monday August 30 2004, @11:03PM (#10114938)
    More than likely, they'll announce that existing subscribers will be able to listen to XM via Windows Media Player/Real Player/etc., as Sirius does. Right now, you need another piece of hardware, and another XM subscription.

    With my Sirius username/password, I can listen to the music channels on my home PC, and the actual receiver is in my pickup. No comedy or sports, but no extra fee, either. My wife can use it simultaneously, as well.

    No, I don't work for Sirius. Honest. I like both XM and Sirius - just speculating on reason ATM.
  • by Fnkmaster (89084) on Monday August 30 2004, @11:06PM (#10114960)
    I ordered mine on Thursday from xm-radio-satellite.com (they're out of stock now like everyone else), and it shipped out Friday. Supposedly mid-transit right now up to NYC from Florida, scheduled UPS delivery date Wednesday.


    Now if only I could pick stocks that quintupled in value in 5 days....

  • Going for $400? I think not. by smart.id (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:08PM
  • Still availible here... by keeleysam (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:10PM
  • Nothing to see here (Score:5, Interesting)

    by GrimCracker (224167) on Monday August 30 2004, @11:11PM (#10114990)
    The canceling of the PCR is more likely related to the rumored inclusion of a USB port on the soon to be released Skyfi 2. They're not going to shout from the rooftops that they're discontinuing it any more than they advertised the demise of the Roady in favor of the Roady 2. There is no conspiracy here.
  • X.M.P.C.R.? by deft (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:19PM
  • Flash: RIAA shoots own foot (Score:4, Insightful)

    by H_Fisher (808597) <hvfisher@ho t m a il.com> on Monday August 30 2004, @11:20PM (#10115044)
    If the RIAA *is* behind this, it seems awfully damned counterproductive.

    Think about it. So-called "time shifting" is (for the moment) legal. They never minded people taping things off the radio. They're mad as hell about people not paying for their music - but radio airplay makes money for them through compulsory fees, not to mention publicity (at least in theory, IANA broadcaster...)

    Enter Sirius / XM; the industry still gets money and still gets publicity (perhaps more than before; with all the niche stations and lack of commercials & inane banter, I've been tempted to subscribe...) And more people are willing to PAY FOR MUSIC because of this service - just not the $18 or so they want 'em to pay.

    So if the RIAA is behind the move to get rid of the XMPCR, what do they expect? That a lot of the people who subscribe will continue to pay for XM, AND pay for a copy of the CD, AND pay another couple of bucks for a "legal" version for their portable player once it becomes illegal or impossible to rip it yourself ... And of course piracy is a perfect excuse^H^H^H^Hplanation for why XM will lose subscribers from this.

  • Special gadgets not necessary? by Waffle Iron (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:24PM
  • Thank goodness for big business by atrizzah (Score:1) Monday August 30 2004, @11:26PM
  • This is getting ridiculous by Stevyn (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:28PM
  • What's the difference? by ayersrj (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:30PM
  • CarPC Project by LinuxWhore (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:34PM
  • closed source by Doc Ruby (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:36PM
  • Sirius! by callipygian-showsyst (Score:2) Monday August 30 2004, @11:41PM
  • by IronChefMorimoto (691038) on Monday August 30 2004, @11:44PM (#10115171)
    Screw this XMPCR crap. I want that little silver car that the XM office geek drives into his high-rise office building. Who needs a chic, cheap computer-based XM receiver when you can friggin' drive your cool little car right up to your cubicle?

    Did I mention that NO ONE from this guy's office bitched about him driving that little car through the hall and cutting them off at the elevator?

    What about the hot chick in the left of the elevator that's eyeing his little silver car? Schwing! With the XMPCR, chicks'll just give you looks like, "That's gadget geek from the mail room or accounting, right? So sad -- look how he cradles his laptop and that weird mouse." No -- she'd be asking for a lift down to cubicle area 37 on the 11th floor -- chauffeur style.

    And damn -- talk about being able to take a break. You don't have to walk the three blocks at 12:30pm for your half hour lunch/nap in the car just to listen to the XM radio and justify the cost of the service. And remember -- it'd be THAT radio you'd be carrying those three blocks along with a laptop if you had the XMPCR. Hell no! With the silver XM car, you'd just walk out of your cubicle, open up the cooler in the trunk, grab your ham sandwich and chips, and lay down in the back seat.

    Hell -- if your boss DOES bitch about you blocking the aisles betweens cubes 45 and 46, you can just "accidentally" back over him and drag his body under your cubicle desk before anyone notices. The XM radio in the car can be turned up to drown out his dying scream. And, if he's still alive, you can beat him over the head with that XM jukebox that they show in the commercial -- you know you'd have one if you had the cool XM car!

    If you had that piddly XMPCR and your boss bitched about the music, what would you do? Strangle him with the USB cord? Hell no. He may be your lame ass boss, but he does get to the company gym for the executives while you ride on the shitty subway home with your XMPCR that gets looks from thieves on the train. What exercise have you had while he's been at the gym, eh? He's take that USB cord and strangle YOUR ass!

    Yeah -- screw that overpriced XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car!

    IronChefMorimoto
  • how about this by austad (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:01AM
  • Awww by SEWilco (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:09AM
    • Re:Awww by jotok (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @06:33AM
  • Inevitable by Guppy06 (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:17AM
  • Isn't this all conjecture? by wheresmysocks (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:24AM
  • They will never win. Period. by l8apex (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:25AM
    • Exhibit A (Score:5, Interesting)

      Netpliance and the iOpener

      The original hack required someone to fabricate a hard-drive bracket and cable, plus solder a 40-pin IDE header to the board. Then they tried to stop it and the real fun began.

      Netpliance locked out the BIOS. So people started sharing old BIOS images, then somebody had to open up their unit, pull the flash, reflash it in a programmer, then reassemble.

      Netpliance then started epoxying the BIOS into the socket. So then people wrote a QNX flash program.

      Netpliance then started sending the Cease and Desist letters. Somebody wrote a webpage with an embedded QNX flash applet. No screwdriver required... just point it's built in web-browser at a URL.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:They will never win. Period. by MedHead (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @01:15AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Conspiracy? by john_smith_45678 (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @12:49AM
  • XM is the devil (Score:3, Interesting)

    by austad (22163) on Tuesday August 31 2004, @01:01AM (#10115467)
    (http://www.juniperforum.com/)
    XM is 60% owned by ClearChannel anyway. Why would you want to give your money to them?

    Buy a Sirius tuner and suck it up. Sirius plays better music too.
  • bad move by ALpaca2500 (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @01:02AM
  • Interesting bit in the article... by Guppy06 (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @01:12AM
  • Who isn't kicking themselves... by iammaxus (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @01:21AM
  • RIAA not behind it? by skinfitz (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @02:00AM
  • I want satellite radio for the car by drinkypoo (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @02:11AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Simple Solution by Lord Kano (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @02:24AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • How is this "rights?" by wshs (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @05:24AM
  • Cause and Effect? (Score:5, Informative)

    Everyone's been assuming that this is in response to TimeTrax. People seem to be forgetting that this has been available for some time (along with other, similar software). Also note that the XMPCR was on super-duper clearance in some places ($15 at XMFan.com a few weeks back, though w/out antenna).

    The general buzz on the XM message boards is that XM Radio was planning to discontinue the XMPCR for some time, and it just became evident (clearance sales, retail channels drying up, etc.) right about the same time as the software concerns hit the radar.

    I mean, really -- could a big company like XM really decide to pull a piece of hardware from the market on only a day's notice? (the TimeTrax software and initial rumors of XMPCR being pulled happened on the same day). There's also been talk of a USB port on new cradles (which may or may not have been recently nixed, depending on your paranoia settings).

    And anyway, the XMPCR was never a big seller for them. Only available from online merchants, it was originally a cheap way for someone to get XM (since they didn't need to sell any controls or displays). Now, the prices have come down (my SkiFi with cradle cost $200, a Roady2 with free home cradle is $100), so they don't need the bottom-end as much any longer.

    So, yes, it's possible there was some RIAA pressure, and it's possible XM decided on their own to avoid the RIAA, but if so, that was probably only the last straw -- I would not be surprised if they'd made this decision 6 months ago.
  • There is no way that XM is dropping this product l by aggie_knight (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @06:53AM
  • Not selling... by Traicovn (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @08:10AM
  • What's next, RDS? by Fitch (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @08:53AM
  • Guess I dodged a bullet by mwood (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @09:08AM
  • Can you say BS? by nurb432 (Score:2) Tuesday August 31 2004, @09:30AM
  • DirecTv has Music (Score:3, Interesting)

    by theManInTheYellowHat (451261) on Tuesday August 31 2004, @10:16AM (#10118483)
    And with MythTv I am hoping that I can grab the music (that much is trivial) and somehow get the text descriptions that come up with the song.

    This has been available for quite a while so I don't understand all the fuss overthe leagal speculations. I bet it was a simple "these things are not selling like hotcakes and the support team costs us a bundle" rpoblem.
  • XM did NOT pull PCR by normgregory (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @10:17AM
  • I doubt its the recording... by Nostafa (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @11:44AM
  • Psion Wavefinder by ksattic (Score:1) Tuesday August 31 2004, @11:59AM
  • Opie and Anthony the reason? by hime (Score:1) Wednesday September 01 2004, @02:00PM
  • OpenXM vanished! by Eric Smith (Score:2) Saturday September 04 2004, @03:53AM
  • 20 replies beneath your current threshold.