Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Thai Gov't Sets Up Site For Snitching On Royals' Critics

Posted by timothy on Sun Apr 05, 2009 09:41 PM
from the yes-yes-the-king-is-good dept.
An anonymous reader writes "In a move that would make the old eastern German Stasi green with envy, the Thai government has modernized a system that allows citizens to snitch on fellow citizens. 'Internet users are being urged to show their loyalty to the king by contributing to a new website called protecttheking.net, which has been set up by a parliamentary committee. On the site's front page it is described as a means for Thai people to show their loyalty to the king by protecting him from what it calls misunderstandings about him. It calls on all citizens to inform on anyone suspected of insulting or criticising the monarchy.' An large unknown population of political prisoners are currently being held for 3 to 15 years in Thai prisons for being interpreted as insulting the monarchy."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Thailand Blocks Anti-Royal Websites 169 comments
societyofrobots writes "'The Thai government says it is planning to build an Internet firewall to block websites deemed insulting to the country's hugely popular royal family.' In the past, Thailand has blocked YouTube because of a video that criticized the King. While, locally served websites that criticize the king are forcefully taken down, this new law will attack external sites."
[+] More Websites Offending Thai Monarchy Blocked 220 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Thailand is ramping up their media wide censorship of anything that remotely offends Thai royalty. In the last three weeks, another 2,300 websites have been blocked. Another ~4,000 are soon expected. And not just websites, but books as well as the Economist have been blocked. And anyone caught publishing such material, including foreigners, will get 3 to 15 years in a Thai prison. You don't want to be in a Thai prison!"
[+] Games: Thai Gaming Sites Ordered Shut Down After Suicide 82 comments
eldavojohn writes "Seventy-two websites have been ordered shut down by the courts in Thailand following the suicide of a 12-year-old boy who jumped from the sixth story of his school after his father banned him from playing computer games. This brings more action from the court: 'Some websites are rumored to take in over 100 million baht from online betting a night at peak periods, causing huge economic losses to the country. To prevent online gambling, the DSI, also a member of the internet safety committee, would notify all Internet service providers across the country about the court order. From now on, any provider found to encourage or provide online gambling will not only face a jail term and a fine, but also have his/her ISP license revoked by the ICT.' Thailand is no stranger to internet censorship of various sites."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by bconway (63464) on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:44PM (#27471147) Homepage

    Sorry, had to be said.

    • by iYk6 (1425255) on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:53PM (#27471243) Homepage

      I was thinking of writing in myself. Anonymously, of course.

      "I am here to report myself, who frequently claims that the king has inappropriate sexual relations with monkeys. My name is Anonymous."

      • Screw the anonymous part, I'll use my real name. I can be fairly creative when it comes to visuals, too.
          • Advise as many folks as possible at the State Department of your next trip, post a bunch of blog entries about your plans, call your Senator to let him/her know you'll be taking lots of pictures and keeping detailed notes on your trip, and once everything is confirmed as "high visibility" go ahead and post your thoughts on the new site. Be sure to call a couple of CNN anchors to let them know about all the steps you've taken, and dare Thai officials to do a goddamned thing about your online activities once you get there.

            Worst case scenario: you get detained for a couple of days, get international exposure from human rights groups and major media outlets, and sell a book deal on the whole charade. I'd do it myself, but frankly I'm too busy with other pursuits.
  • Ants (Score:5, Informative)

    by Man On Pink Corner (1089867) on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:45PM (#27471153)

    Those people really are nothing but ants.

    That, and their king has a fugly wife and a really dumb-looking hat.

  • Slashdotted? (Score:4, Informative)

    by CrazyJim1 (809850) on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:46PM (#27471161) Journal
    Anyone else actually try and go to the website? I did and I got nothing.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Maybe they have a pf rule in to block non-Thais.
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Would the site respond at all in that case? I just get read errors after a while.

        But maybe it is for the best as I have it on good authority that His Majesty isn't actually quite "the Great" at all, that most of his $35 billion fortune is in fact Monopoly money, that he molests dead farm animals in the pale moonlight while "Twilight Time" by The Platters plays gently on his Zune, and that the queen is a whore and the prince holds the money. LÃse majesté crimes are fun!

  • So... (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:46PM (#27471167)
    Who wants to help me flood it with fake comments?
  • Fair enough (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:49PM (#27471193)

    Report every government official (from diplomats to police), every relative of a government official, and everyone related to the king.

    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      If enough people make false reports, they'll have to set up a site to report people who report people.

  • by syousef (465911) on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:52PM (#27471225) Journal

    Their government try to sell the country as a tourist destination. Well you know what, if I have tourist dollars to spend you can bet I won't be visiting a country where I can go to jail just for criticising someone.

  • by Maxhrk (680390) on Sunday April 05 2009, @09:54PM (#27471249) Journal
    A brave american from here in US want to say,

    Thai King, you suck.

    (ok i am coward hiding in US somewhere, anyway.)
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      No, you're not, Maxhrk.

      But, I am.

  • by ArchieBunker (132337) on Sunday April 05 2009, @10:02PM (#27471307) Homepage

    Either spam it full of garbage or some important people close to the king.

  • by basementman (1475159) on Sunday April 05 2009, @10:06PM (#27471349) Homepage
    No way this could be used to insult the king or anything. I might have to report my neighbor, Thaikingsucksbigcock Smith for some things he told me the other day.
  • The Thai King (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 05 2009, @10:09PM (#27471373)
    The Thai King has very little real power but he yields immense moral authority and is very popular. Thailand is legally a constitutional monarchy but in reality the situation is much more complex. They are supposed to be run by an elected gov't (which is usually a little bit corrupt) but that rule is enforced by the military and about every 10-15 years, there is a military coup (often fairly or completely bloodless) that throws out an exceptionally corrupt gov't and reboots.

    In some ways, the Thai Gov't kinda reminds me of an unpatched Windows Machine that needs lots of reboots and eventually a disk-wipe to get working again -- but talking about the gov't structure itself doesn't really explain why insulting the King is a big deal.

    Again, like I said... the King is a "moral authority". In many ways, he's the Thai equivalent to the Pope although more in the moral sense than religious sense -- he is a man who is loved by the people and is wished to be seen as "good" by most Thai's. Insulting the King (or Queen) is a personal insult to many Thai people and is one of the few things the Thai in general do not tolerate well overall. Insulting the King in Thailand is the equivalent of bad-mouthing the Pope while visiting the Vatican.

    That said, I'd rather visit Thailand again anyday than the many countries in the world that are significantly less tolerant [timesonline.co.uk].
    • Once you bring in the jackbooted thugs and the jail time "moral authority" is off the table. At least the papacy hasn't had legal power in quite some time, so the pope confines himself to wearing a dress and giving terrible medical advice.
    • Re:The Thai King (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Max Littlemore (1001285) on Monday April 06 2009, @12:44AM (#27472321)

      Insulting the King in Thailand is the equivalent of bad-mouthing the Pope while visiting the Vatican.

      Or shitting on the star spangled banner in front of the white house.

      See? Now some of you might get it - a corrupt republic is no better than a monarchy if all you've done is replace the monarch with a flag.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Perhaps he's popular precisely because he doesn't have real power. It's the pricks that do meddle in peoples lives that become unpopular.

        The peculiar thing about the USA is that it invents it's own royalty. What else could explain political families like the Bushes, Kennedys etc?

      • Re:The Thai King (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Potor (658520) <farker1@gm a i l.com> on Sunday April 05 2009, @10:48PM (#27471687) Journal

        If you think there is an obvious American opinion to this matter, you are a moron. Travel a bit. Open your mind and your eyes.

        The Thai people do love him, which is why it is such a problem to criticize him. They personally hate it when the king is insulted (I speak from experience, having lived and worked in Thailand for over a year). The government constantly use this popular love to pass laws that favour themselves and not the king because they can use such legislation to lock people up on the slightest context.

        The king him disfavours the lese majeste laws, and wishes aloud for their abolition.

  • by Eth1csGrad1ent (1175557) on Sunday April 05 2009, @10:16PM (#27471427)

    If you think they aren't serious, check out the following recent story about a lucky Aussie who supposedly criticised the Thai Royal Family. I say lucky because, after much protest and legal fighting, he was deported after he'd been jailed for 6 years !

    http://www.theage.com.au/national/jailed-author-back-on-australian-soil-20090221-8dx7.html [theage.com.au]
     

  • by nathan.fulton (1160807) on Sunday April 05 2009, @10:44PM (#27471659) Homepage Journal
    http://www.thekoratpost.com/Protectthekingwebsiteenglishdetails.html [thekoratpost.com]

    It contains, in part, this: How To Report Tips

    Tips â" This link provides a couple of methods on how to report tips in. One method is to mail to P.O. Box 999, Bangkok . Another indicated is to email directly to protecttheking@parliament.go.th As well, there is an in-page form in Thai for users to complete.

    Law & Punishment

    This page has five separate links under this title, numbered as shown for convenience. The unnumbered links are:

    1. Article 2 - Use of Criminal Law

    This section is a verbatim lift from Thai Criminal Code Chapter 2, Articles no. 4-7.

    Article 6 - Principals and Supporters [of cr= iminal acts, i.e., lÃse majesté]

    This section is a verbatim lift from Thai Criminal Code Chapter 6, Articles no. 83-89.

    3. Article 7 â" Concurrence of Offenses
    This section is a verbati= m lift from Thai Criminal Code Chapter 7, Concurrence of Offenses, Articles no. 90-91.

    4. Article 9 â" Statute of Limitations

    This section is a verbati= m lift from Thai Criminal Code Chapter 9, Prescription (statute of limitations.), Articles no. 95-101.

    5. Part 2 â" Offenses Related to National Security; Article 2, Offenses Against the king, queen, heir to the throne or regent. [Translatorâ(TM)s note: This section is a verbatim lift from the = Thai Criminal Code Book II, Specific Offenses, Title 1, Offenses Relating to The Security of the Kingdom, Articles no. 107-112.
      • Under the infamous PM Thaksin, the "War on Drugs" gave Thai police the authority to execute drug dealers in the north on the spot with no trial. It became simply a way to consolodate the drug business and/or get rid of trouble makers. The police (corrupt and involved in drug trafficking themselves) killed whomever they wished and planted drugs on the body after.

        Now that was a war on drugs. This new affair will end similarly.

  • Report (Score:3, Funny)

    by Alsee (515537) on Sunday April 05 2009, @10:51PM (#27471719) Homepage

    Report: My neighbor was spreading rumors that the King was paranoid and an evil oppressive dictator imprisoning anyone who questioned or insulted him.

    -

  • Awesome - (Score:3, Informative)

    by bizitch (546406) on Sunday April 05 2009, @11:21PM (#27471891) Homepage

    I clicked the link for the snitching website - but it didn't work right away - so to be sure - I just clicked the link again - over and over and over and over - but it still didn't work ...

  • by LandownEyes (838725) on Sunday April 05 2009, @11:28PM (#27471925)
    Bet they'll be pissed tomorrow when they check the submissions and it's nothing but "First post!!!!1'.
  • monarchies are a ridiculous anachronism

    uk, thailand, japan: follow nepal please, lose your bullshit historical baggage

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepalese_monarchy [wikipedia.org]

  • by jrhawk42 (1028964) on Sunday April 05 2009, @11:52PM (#27472053)
    King Bhumibol Adulyadej is actually against the lÃse majesté law. So you're probably asking yourself why is this a problem? It's a problem for two reasons. One is the Thai people for the most part love their King, and insulting him is like insulting the country. Highly conservative groups feel like this is treason and should be treated as such. The other reason the lÃse majesté law is still in effect is that the current Thai government relies on the good name of the king. In their eyes if the King is no longer respected than the government that is supported by the king is no longer respected either. Yea it doesn't make much sense to normal people, but these are politicians we are talking about. I'd also like to point out that the Thai Monarchy is a shining example of how a Monarchy should behave. The Thai's have good reason to love their king.
      • by achurch (201270) on Monday April 06 2009, @01:01AM (#27472405) Homepage

        You think Monarchy that locks up anyone who criticizes it, in any way is... a 'good example' of a monarchy?

        Perhaps you missed the part where the OP wrote, "King Bhumibol Adulyadej is actually against the lèse majesté law"? It's the government that's at fault here, not the King. And notice that he's not grabbing power from the government to abolish the law himself, either; he's only stating his wishes and hoping that the true seat of power (the government) listens to him.

  • by NewsWatcher (450241) on Monday April 06 2009, @12:21AM (#27472195)

    Well, it looks like it is time to sink the boot into Thais again, and their over-the-top laws in relation to Lese Majesty (criticising the royals).

    I agree that people should be free to criticise anyone in a free society, and that locking people up for up to 15 years for something as minor as criticising a royal is ludicrous, here are some facts you may not be aware of:

    1. Thailand's king Bhumibol Adulyadej said a few years ago in a birthday speech that the law of lese majesty was outdated and he would pardon anyone found guilty of the crime. He has since kept his word.

    2. The crime of lese majesty came about in Thailand because under their constitution it is illegal for the royal family (who are supposed to be above the rest of society) to comment on the day-to-day running of society. They cannot respond to political attacks, nor can they react if people personally attack their character.

    3. Because the Thai royals cannot respond to attacks, and take legal action or comment at any defamatory comments about them, the crime of lese majesty was inserted into the country's constitution, as a safeguard against political attacks on the royals.

    4. Every time there is a general election the parliament has to vote on whether to can the lese majesty laws. Despite the king saying the laws no longer need to be in existence, the Thai people revere the king, and would vote out of office any politician who voted to abandon the lese majesty laws, hence the laws remain.

    People in Thailand do not have the same freedom of speech rights that people in the west do, but to portray the king as some sort of evil ogre who is so sensitive to criticms that he cannot deal with an insult is just ridiculous.

    This website will no doubt create a bureaucratic headache for the king, but should not be seen as evidence that Thailand is a dictatorial state.

    • Re:Idiots! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Man On Pink Corner (1089867) on Monday April 06 2009, @12:43AM (#27472317)

      The king of Thailand is protected by a set of old laws called Lese Majeste, which essentially means it is a crime to injure the king in any way (including verbally).You may not agree with it, and in fact, the Thai king himself is against these laws, but this is their way.

      And in some parts of Africa a female child may have her clitoris excised to save her from sexual temptation later in life. Now in some less-enlightened quarters, this is considered a bad idea. But hey, what do I know, I'm just an ugly American imposing my cultural views on the world, right?

      Cultural relativism is as harmful a mind virus as religion. Some things in the world are broken, and sticking your fingers in your ears and pretending otherwise does not make you morally superior.

      • Re:Idiots! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Stormwatch (703920) <rodrigogirao@@@hotmail...com> on Monday April 06 2009, @01:17AM (#27472483) Homepage

        And in some parts of Africa a female child may have her clitoris excised to save her from sexual temptation later in life. Now in some less-enlightened quarters, this is considered a bad idea. But hey, what do I know, I'm just an ugly American imposing my cultural views on the world, right?

        Well, when it comes to improper use of blades, America is not all that enlightened either... (see sig below)