Slashdot Log In
Interpol Pushing World Facial Recognition Database
Posted by
ScuttleMonkey
on Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:57 PM
from the here's-lookin-at-you dept.
from the here's-lookin-at-you dept.
The Register is reporting that according to some reports, Interpol will soon be pushing for a world-wide facial recognition database at the borders of all member nations. "The UK already has airport gates equipped with such technology, intended to remove the need for a human border guard to check that a passenger's face matches the one recorded in his or her passport. According to the Guardian, Interpol database chief Mark Branchflower believes that his organization should set up a database of facial-recognition records to operate alongside its existing photo, fingerprint and DNA files."
Related Stories
[+]
Israel Moves Toward a National Biometric Database 476 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Israeli's government has approved the creation of a biometric database which would contain fingerprints and facial photos of all Israeli citizens. If the bill becomes law — and it is at an early stage — the biometric information of each citizen would be embedded in their passport and national ID card. Israeli citizens would be required by law to submit to biometric testing upon request by government employees, soldiers, and policemen, so that their biometric info can be compared to the info embedded in their ID card / passport. The declared purpose of the bill is to combat forgery of passports and ID cards, and also to aid identification 'in cases of a mass disaster.' The bill was approved over objections from civil rights groups and the Israeli Bar. The article notes that no other democratic country has a comprehensive biometric database of all citizens."
[+]
Chipped Passport Cloned In Minutes 326 comments
Death Metal Maniac writes "New microchip passports designed to be foolproof against identity theft failed the test when a researcher was able to manipulate one in minutes. The cloned passports were accepted as genuine by the computer software recommended for use at international airports. According to the article: 'A computer researcher cloned the chips on two British passports and implanted digital images of Osama bin Laden and a suicide bomber. The altered chips were then passed as genuine by passport reader software used by the UN agency that sets standards for e-passports.'"
[+]
IT: Hackers Clone Elvis' Passport 164 comments
Barence writes "Hackers have released source code that allows the 'backup' of RFID-protected passports, although the tool can potentially be used to create fake or cloned documents. The Hacker's Choice, a non-commercial group of computer security experts, has released a video showing a cloned passport being approved by a security scanner at a Dutch airport. When the reader scans the passport, it is revealed to belong to one Elvis Aaron Presley, complete with picture. Reports of the hackers serenading security staff with 'Are You Clonesome Tonight' are unconfirmed."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
There Already Is One (Score:5, Interesting)
Why do you think they have that "tagging" feature for the photos? Didn't you know all this time that you've been training their face recognition database?
Schwab
Re:There Already Is One (Score:4, Informative)
Here's a fairly balanced article [itsecurity.com] on the CIA/Facebook connection.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
"Arrest him! On Facebook it says he's a Libertarian. We can't have these free-thinkers running around!"
Re:There Already Is One (Score:5, Insightful)
"Arrest him! On Facebook it says he's a Libertarian. We can't have these free-thinkers running around!"
Once upon a time commitment to American principles made one a patriot. Now blind support of all government policies is required.
Parent
Re:There Already Is One (Score:4, Interesting)
I try to envision the right model for security and privacy as small town America. In this model everyone knows everyone else and for the most part, when you see your neighbor, he/she sees you.
Extrapolating this to the modern world, a world-wide facial recognition database would be compatible if the following additional conditions were met:
a) everyone had access to it (Everyone knows everyone else)
b) it was trivially easy to see where the cameras were (when you see me, I see you)
c) cameras were only in a relatively few number of places. (when I'm behind "closed doors" I'm out of public view)
I'm not convinced governments can abide by these above rules, but if they could I'd be OK living in a world-wide "small town".
Parent
Re:There Already Is One (Score:5, Insightful)
Me, I like to live in a world-wide "big city". I don't know if you've ever lived in "small town America", but if you happen to be a different color, ethnicity or sexual orientation from most of your other "small town neighbors" life can be an absolute hell. The problem is, there are lots of stupid, small-minded people in small towns AND big cities. But in small towns, where "everybody knows you" those stupid people can really fuck things up for you, whereas in a "big city" you can move to a part of town where there are others who are more openminded. Or (and this is important) you can just be anonymous.
This notion that somehow there is this suddenly emergent need for greater security is a complete load of bullshit being perpetrated on us by people who want to use this "security" to become more powerful.
If anything, I'd suggest that privacy and anonymity is more important now than it ever has been. I'll go a step further and say that cameras and databases are about the worst way to make a society "secure". The only people who become more "secure" are those in the security regime.
Parent
Re:There Already Is One (Score:5, Informative)
Once upon a time commitment to American principles made one a patriot. Now blind support of all government policies is required.
Yeah, the DHS had a pamphlet out that listed the Gadsden Flag as a symbol of domestic terrorism.
The line between patriotism and nationalism is a thin one.. but I believe that a nationalist is a blind patriot.
It really disturbs me when I hear John McCain talk about "Country first".. That is absolutely UN-American. Americans believe the individual needs are placed about the needs of the state. China is a place where the needs of the state come before those of the individual people, not America.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Oh its ridiculous. The Gadsden flag is a US flag and for a time was the OFFICIAL US flag of the 13 colonies. (denoted by the 13 rattles on the snakes tail.)
Domestic Terrorists
Anti-Government Groups
Often associated with unorganized militias, the Anti-Government movement actually embraces a much larger variety of groups and causes. The extreme fringe believes that the U.S. government is either the enemy or has been subverted by the enemy and must be actively defended against.
There is nothing wrong proclaiming that you want to defend your rights from government. The prefatory clause to the second amendment also states that the local militia is a requirement to security of a free state.
Anti-Government Issues and Beliefs
Gun Control is a conspiracy to enslave us starting with the removal of our ability to either defend ourselves or forcefully change our government.
No we wouldn't want people to be able to defend themselves.
The first ten amendments of The Constitution are God given and all others are temporary, invalid or outright fraudulent.
Totally wrong interpretation of the Constitution. The Constitution is written in neg
Re:There Already Is One (Score:5, Funny)
This is why everyone should use goatse as their facebook image.
"Sir, according to the records at the CIA this guy is a huge asshole."
Parent
A big book of faces.. (Score:5, Insightful)
A big database, kind of like a 'book', of everyone's face? Maybe with a stack of personal information? And make it really hard to take your details off?
Like we'd ever fall for that!
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
All Your Face... (Score:5, Funny)
All Your Face Are Belong To Us!
Alternate Applications (Score:4, Interesting)
I wonder how long it will be before this technology is utilized outside the airport gates...like, for example, with all of the myriad CCTV cameras currently infesting London.
What sort of resolution does this technology require? Could the technology be used on the CCTV images?
Re:Alternate Applications (Score:5, Funny)
What sort of resolution does this technology require? Could the technology be used on the CCTV images?
I wonder if this could also help with my porn collection and help me figure who's face is in the random porn pictures I have.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
You don't want to know.
Trust me.
Finding out the cute 20-year-old from your "randomstuff" folder is now a 30-something mom who weighs 200 pounds is a real downer. Especially if she's still posing. That sight can really deflate your fantasy.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, deflate your fantasy.
Re:Alternate Applications (Score:4, Funny)
It's facial recognition software.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This technology doesn't work well enough for CCTV.
Sure about that? FTFA:
Wrong end (Score:4, Funny)
They need to develop ass recognition software, so they can track down the goatse guy and make him pay for all the suffering he's inflicted upon us.
what is the current accurcy rate? (Score:5, Insightful)
An auxiliary question is whether machine accuracy exceeds humans. People make mistakes too.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Even 1% false positives or negatives in a huge application will lead to lots of problems...
Ah yes, the base rate fallacy (aka, the terrorist fallacy).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy [wikipedia.org]
One of those obvious things that is so hard to convey.
Interesting that the 'example' used in the wikipedia article is so near to what is happening in reality.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I'm uncertain - are you arguing that he's fallen for the fallacy or pointing it out?
I am just trying to point it out in support of his statement...and I'm not doing a very good job, evidently :(
Re:what is the current accurcy rate? (Score:5, Informative)
Anyway, even at the current level of accuracy, it can't operate really well without human assistance.
Parent
Re: (Score:3)
So, they screw up once in a while and get Buttle rather than Tuttle. Do you think the UK (or US, since it will soon be in the States too, I'm sure) even cares about ruining the occasional person's life? Besides, they'll get a receipt for it.
Re:what is the current accuracy rate? (Score:2)
Think of the fun at airport gates: "Se need to better identify you - please show use your gait and when you're finished, please masticate in front of the camera..."
(@%@$! first jackets, then shoes, now I'm supposed to masticate at the gait?)
I'm not sure... (Score:2, Interesting)
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
Supplies of Groucho glasses reach a all time low...
Opt-out Where You Can (Score:5, Informative)
On the New Hampshire Driver's License application/renewal form, there's a checkbox on the back that requires the State to delete your photo from its database after making the license. (Now that they're mailing the licenses though I have to wonder about their backup strategies.)
Do it where you can and get your legislature to require your DMV to do so if necessary. Also get them to reject RealID. If you can't, move here [freestateproject.org].
Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)
Obligatory John Woo... (Score:5, Interesting)
No more drugs for this man!
So, jesting aside, how will this work with cosmetic surgery? Will celebrities getting cosmetic work abroad no longer be identified correctly? Will actual terrorists suddenly become interested in elective procedures just to fool the system? How will the system deal with the fact that people change as they age? Interesting questions.
I wonder if this will become a legitimate tool for law enforcement, or if it will be yet another big brother tool.
oh crap ... (Score:2)
Ironic (Score:5, Interesting)
Seems ironic to me that we have the international law-enforcement agencies as well as a ton of cross-border data and system sharing agreements all intended to stop people from crossing the borders themselves. They want information about us to be world wide but they don't want us to be world wide.
Note to self: (Score:2)
Invest in realistic-mask-making companies.
Not quite Big Brother (Score:3, Informative)
The summary and the Register article make it sound like Interpol wants to keep a record of everyone with a passport. This does not appear to be the case, according to the original article [guardian.co.uk] which the Register ripped off and rewrote.
Senior figures want a system that lets immigration officials capture digital images of passengers and immediately cross-check them against a database of pictures of terror suspects, international criminals and fugitives.
Not that I like the scheme, but it doesn't sound quite as police-state as some might think. My picture is already taken all over the place if I go to the airport, this would take my picture and cross-check it with a database of known criminals, terrorists and fugitives.
Re:Not quite Big Brother (Score:5, Insightful)
Surveillance is a slippery slope.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
My picture is already taken all over the place if I go to the airport, this would take my picture and cross-check it with a database of known criminals, terrorists and fugitives.
...and store your picture in a non-terrorist database, and in the event that you join a revolutionary movement to overthrow your highly corrupt government move your entry into the terrorist list, providing a convenient means to locate and apprehend you. And I don't necessarily mean your government is corrupt today, just that it could one day be.
Your picture may be taken all over the place already, but citing this as a reason why the proposed system isn't big-brother-eque doesn't make much sense. If people a
Terrorist face recognition! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Terrorist face recognition! (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re:Terrorist face recognition! (Score:5, Funny)
Solution? Demand that all terrorists wear traditional middle eastern clothing. Even the abortion-clinic and McVeigh types.
It's not fool-proof, I admit -A lot of non-terrorists also wear traditional middle eastern clothing, and some may cry "profiling", but it's a good first step. Then, at security, the screeners can ask anyone in the right mode of dress, "Are you a terrorist?" The ones that say "Yes" are then arrested.
And then I can finally make it through line without taking off my shoes. Flawless.
Parent
Nixon masks make a comeback. (Score:2)
Well, I'm screwed (Score:5, Interesting)
The Federal government has my photo from my passport stored somewhere.
It has my DNA from my stint in the Army.
It has has my fingerprints from security clearance applications and several FBI background checks I've had to go through to be a teacher.
My only solace is, in all of my photos for federal documents I'm frowning like an NFL star posing for a picture, and on all my Facebook pictures I'm smiling.
Though when it comes down to it, if the government goes to crap, I'm screwed.
FaceEx database query (Score:2)
SELECT FaceImage from tblFaces where FaceEx(FaceImage) LIKE FaceEx(@MINE)
SELECT FaceImage from tblFaces where FaceEx(FaceImage) LIKE FaceEx('salma.hayek.faceimage')
SELECT FaceImage from tblFaces where FaceEx(FaceImage) LIKE FaceEx(@YERMOM)
Tomorrow, Class, we will discuss the JOIN, INSERT INTO, and GROUP BY operators.
1984 (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Incorrect. 1984 is what Orwell thought the future would be like in the year 1984.
I always thought that Orwell was an optimist.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And so was Atlas Shrugged, I'm waiting for John Galt to interrupt my regularly scheduled program any day now.
Re:What if I get a new scar? (Score:4, Funny)
How many times have you been mauled by a bear in the past 10 years?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Unless those are unreasonably large scars, they shouldn't make any difference. Facial recognition typically relies on the size/placement of the facial bones, which generally don't change significantly, barring extreme trauma.
Though the people advocating this need to be sent home to read up on base rate negligence before they continue speaking.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Growing up in Malawi as a young Dutch boy, I once (age seven or so) asked my nanny, a South-African woman, how she could tell other African people apart, as they all looked the same to me. Not the one's I knew personally of course, just the other 99.9%.
This is the kind of question only a child can and will ask, and after laughing, she confided in me she had the same thought about Europeans (that they all looked alike).
Somehow, I don't think software is going to have this problem, allthough the prejudices of