Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Jack Thompson's Letter To Take-Two Exec's Mother

Posted by timothy on Sun May 04, 2008 03:58 PM
from the an-insult-to-actual-slime-molds-everywhere dept.
debatem1 writes "Apparently, anti-violent-video-games crusader Jack Thompson is at it again, this time writing a letter to the mother of Strauss Zelnick, Chairman of Take-Two, the company that produces the GTA series of video games. In it he compares Zelnick to a member of the Hitler Youth, advocates beating the young Zelnick, and contemplates the existence of a Ted Bundy merit badge for boy scouts."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Judge Recommends Guilty Verdict for Jack Thompson 235 comments
GamePolitics is reporting that a Florida Judge has recommended that Jack Thompson be found guilty on 27 of 31 counts of misconduct and is awaiting a Florida Supreme Court verdict to back him up. Thompson is striking back with allegations against the Judge and others, complaining that loyalty oaths were never signed. "Tunis made 21 recommendations of guilt in relation to Thompson's participation in Strickland vs. Sony, an Alabama case in which the anti-game attorney represented the families of two police officers and a police dispatcher slain by 18-year-old Grand Theft Auto player Devin Moore. Tunis also recommended that Thompson be found guilty on four out of five counts relating to his 2006 attempt to have Rockstar's Bully declared a public nuisance in a case before Miami Judge Ronald Friedman. An additional two guilty counts stemmed from a non-video game matter."
[+] Games: Referee Recommends Disbarment For Jack Thompson 280 comments
spielermacher writes "GamePolitics is reporting that Jack Thompson — the lawyer every gamer loves to hate — has apparently lost his court case and is facing disbarment. The Referee in the case has gone beyond the Florida Bar's request for a 10-year disbarment and is recommending a lifetime ban. From the Final Report issued by the court: '... the Respondent has demonstrated a pattern of conduct to strike out harshly, extensively, repeatedly and willfully to simply try to bring as much difficulty, distraction and anguish to those he considers in opposition to his causes. He does not proceed within the guidelines of appropriate professional behavior ...' All I can say is that it's about time."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Like herpes (Score:5, Funny)

    by mikesd81 (518581) <mikesd1&verizon,net> on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:01PM (#23294370) Homepage
    He's like herpes. The symptoms go away, but it really never goes away.
    • by ColdWetDog (752185) * on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:04PM (#23294394) Homepage
      If I were Zelenik, the next iteration of GTA would have a character that looked exactly like Jack Thompson that a little old lady blows away with an Uzi.

      Just a thought.

      • Re:Like herpes (Score:4, Informative)

        by mikesd81 (518581) <mikesd1&verizon,net> on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:10PM (#23294440) Homepage
        How fast you think it would take for him to file a lawsuit? I'd settle for the ability to blow up "Law offices of JT and partners".
        • by amirulbahr (1216502) on Sunday May 04 2008, @07:39PM (#23295914)

          Miami attorney Jack Thompson, however, claims that heâ(TM)s depicted in the game and wants out.

          You mean it is not the Aussie actor Jack Thompson?? This whole time I swear I thought it was the actor. All these fucking years I just assumed it was the same Jack Thompson until I actually for once in my life RTFA. All the jokes about the Aussie actor and I still didn't get it, I though it was him.

          Let that be a lesson to all you kids out there: RTFA!

      • by eebra82 (907996) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:20PM (#23294542) Homepage
        He would also make an excellent GTA hooker since you'd most definitely feel obliged to blow his brains out after the session, thus getting the $5 back.
      • by neight108 (974915) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:59PM (#23294822)
        Well, in GTA IV, you kill a lawyer and right before he dies he says, "Guns don't kill people. Video games do." [gamepolitics.com]
        • by RobBebop (947356) on Sunday May 04 2008, @10:53PM (#23297038) Homepage Journal

          My understanding is that the GTA video makes a reference to a "lawyer who dislikes violent games" and Thompson thinks it is obviously a parody of him.

          FIRST -- parody's are not slanderous, particularly when they are true to the real life version.

          SECOND -- GTA gets heat from many researchers and lawyers who have much better reputations then Thompson, so it is naive of him to think they would single out him for the joke.

          THIRD -- It is funny, laugh. Geez... show me a guy who can't laugh at a joke about himself and I will show you a guy who'll never be the life of ANY party.

      • Re:Like herpes (Score:5, Interesting)

        by _KiTA_ (241027) on Sunday May 04 2008, @09:47PM (#23296682) Homepage

        If I were Zelenik, the next iteration of GTA would have a character that looked exactly like Jack Thompson that a little old lady blows away with an Uzi.


        Just a thought.

        Supposedly GTA4 has/had a Lawyer that, when faced with the main character gunning him down, screams out that Guns don't kill people, Video Games do, and that violent video games are what's making the main character kill him. Thompson *already* threatened to sue him over it.

        That reminds me, didn't he have an agreement wherein they don't crush him like a bug for libel and he stops mentioning them and their games, at all, forever?
    • by ScrewMaster (602015) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:48PM (#23294760)
      I'd say he's more like syphilis: if you don't get your JT infection treated it will eventually turn your brain into Jell-O.
      • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 04 2008, @08:45PM (#23296316)
        you have offended the makers of Jell-O by saying that Jell-O is the end result of a Jack Thompson infection. Please retract your statement imediately or face a lawsuit
    • by JanneM (7445) on Sunday May 04 2008, @09:35PM (#23296598) Homepage
      Thomson is an animatronic Jack Chick tract.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:01PM (#23294372)

    and see how they feel about their dads conduct

    fairs fair right ?
    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 04 2008, @05:08PM (#23294874)
      My lord! Are you saying that Jack Thompson has had sex? With a woman? And has reproduced?

      Gah, I don't believe it.
    • by magus_melchior (262681) on Sunday May 04 2008, @10:57PM (#23297080) Journal
      1) You're modded insightful, but given his hypocrisy, I'll lay you 100-to-1 that he'll actually sue anyone who even tries.
      1b) Even if fair's fair, you won't dismantle his campaign by stooping to his level.
      2) I'm almost certain that because he's their father, they agree with his general opposition to violent games, and may even deny some of his conduct even happened—it's akin to politicians' kids and relatives.
  • I hope (Score:4, Funny)

    by Idiot with a gun (1081749) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:02PM (#23294384)
    Strauss Zelnick presses charges against Jack Thompson, claiming this was a threat. Mostly because it would entertain me.
    • Re:I hope (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Akaihiryuu (786040) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:04PM (#23294398)
      The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that Jack Thompson is on Take 2's payroll. He's the best advertising they could possibly ask for.
      • Re:I hope (Score:5, Informative)

        by Faylone (880739) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:42PM (#23294716)
          • Re:I hope (Score:5, Informative)

            by Chris Mattern (191822) on Sunday May 04 2008, @09:38PM (#23296610)
            Well, no, he isn't, at least not directly. Unless he was buying stock from a public offering (which I assume he was not), he paid the former owner of the stocks, not the company, to own those stocks. This might indirectly fund Take Two since buying the shares pushes the price upwards, making any shares they might sell in a future public offering (or issue in some other deal such as a takeover) possibly more valuable, but Thompson himself isn't putting any cash in their wallets. In fact, if Take Two was paying dividends, *they'd* be funding *him* (I looked it up on Yahoo, and Take Two is not currently paying dividends). What it *does* do is make him part owner of the company, thus possessing certain rights such as attending shareholder meetings (which is probably why he bought the shares).
    • by n dot l (1099033) on Sunday May 04 2008, @09:40PM (#23296622)
      No. Thompson is a rare resource. Despite his borderline insanity, he still ends up on the news - people know his name. That fame, coupled with the hate he spews every now and again, should not be wasted. It should be harnessed.

      Zelnick should take the letter and auction it off. He should then give the proceeds to Child's Play (or some equally ironic charity), in Thompson's name, of course. Because much as I'd like yet another quiet suit against Thompson, watching him fume helplessly as his attacks are turned against him - again - would be pure poetic justice, and that's just pure win.
  • by nyet (19118) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:05PM (#23294402) Homepage
    Hey, Jack. I'm fairly certain the Hitler Youth would not approve of violence against the authorities. In fact, they would more likely be on the side of authority, decrying any subversive activities that advocate violence against a police state.
      • Wasn't the Hitler Youth basically just pre-war Germany's version of the Boy Scouts anyway? Pretty much every kid was in the Hitler Youth.

        ... including, apparently, the Pope.

        Go figure.

        • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:44PM (#23294738)
          ... including, apparently, the Pope.

          Did he have a choice? And was there really anything fundamentally wrong with the group that would be obvious to a 14 year old child at the time? At the time, Hitler wasn't considered all that bad in Germany. Until the late 1930's he wasn't considered too bad by most of the world.

          Actually, it's claimed that Ratzinger was pretty defiant and avoided going to meetings, but I suspect that's something made up by the Vatican's PR people.
        • by clichescreenname (1220316) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:49PM (#23294766)

          Wasn't the Hitler Youth basically just pre-war Germany's version of the Boy Scouts anyway? Pretty much every kid was in the Hitler Youth.

          ... including, apparently, the Pope.


          Go figure.

          Listen; I'm an atheist, and I understand why people hate the pope. After all, he's probably responsible for a hell of a lot children being molested and teenagers giving birth to unwanted children.

          That being said, the Nazi deal just doesn't stick. He was basically forced into the Hitler Youth, and he ran away when they tried to enlist him in the army.

          So please, can we just stay on target and let this stupid argument die here?
          • by iamacat (583406) on Sunday May 04 2008, @06:33PM (#23295436)

            That being said, the Nazi deal just doesn't stick. He was basically forced into the Hitler Youth, and he ran away when they tried to enlist him in the army.
            Yes, while thousands of young people of the time, including Jehovah's Witnesses, gave their life or were forced into concentration camps for refusing to have anything to do with fascism. And that he encourages people in places like China and Iran to practice forbidden religion. I guess the Pope did nothing wrong as an ordinary German citizen, but he just doesn't measure up as the leading follower of Jesus Christ in the world. As it shows in his actions.
  • Chutzpah (Score:5, Informative)

    by Ian Alexander (997430) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:07PM (#23294414)

    The pornography and violence that your son trafficks in is the kind of stuff that most mothers would be ashamed to see their son putting into the hands of other mothers' children, but, hey, your son Strauss has recently assured the world that he is "a Boy Scout, everybody knows that." I'd love to see the merit badges that Scout Troop handed out. Is there a Ted Bundy merit badge? If so, your loving son deserves one now. It should be red and green, for obvious reasons.
    This guy's got some fucking chutzpah, and not the good kind. This is out-and-out harassment.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:09PM (#23294430)
    Please stop submitting Jack Thompson stories. He's got nothing if you ignore him. Leave it to Shacknews, keep it off Slashdot.
  • Glory Hole (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Frosty Piss (770223) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:11PM (#23294450)
    No one really cares abount Jack Thompson anymore. No one that counts. The only reason Jack Thompson does what he does is because he likes to watch the stink that get's made at sites like Slashdot. The lesson here is to not allow Jack Thompson to get his glory here. This is done by IGNORING Jack Thompson.
    • by Akaihiryuu (786040) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:17PM (#23294518)
      He is seen as the de-facto "spokesperson" of the anti-videogame agenda. And he's dangerously insane, to the point that noone takes him seriously at all. The plus of having such a buffoon "in charge" of the anti-videogame agenda is that no sane person would dare speak up on his side, for fear of being associated with him.
    • by couchslug (175151) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:24PM (#23294588)
      I find him useful.
      Jack personifies the sort of person who objects to video games in the way that Fred Phelps personifies hardcore Christianity.

      We need people like them to remind us of what people who want to micromanage our personal behaviors are really like.
    • Re:Glory Hole (Score:4, Insightful)

      by hardburn (141468) <hardburn@nospAm.wumpus-cave.net> on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:34PM (#23294650)

      He still gets on Fox News/CNN/60 Minutes/etc. People around here have heard of him, sure, but to the world at large, he's just another guy being quoted as an expert on TV. Ignoring him won't discredit his semi-regular TV appearances.

      • Re:Glory Hole (Score:5, Interesting)

        by peipas (809350) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:52PM (#23294786)
        Indeed, he was brought into a discussion about GTA IV on NPR's Talk of the Nation last week. I had never heard him, just read about him. He came off like a total jackass, scoffing at the end, "I'm done?" "Yes, you're done."
        • Re:Glory Hole (Score:5, Informative)

          by LrdDimwit (1133419) on Sunday May 04 2008, @05:11PM (#23294898)
          Well that's kind of what happens when the interviewer asks you a question, and you respond by saying "I'm not going to tell you that". (I believe it was 'which law enforcement agencies are you working with?') I mean, the whole point of appearing on the show in the first place is to answer the interviewer's questions! You shouldn't be surprised when, after you say you're not answering their questions, they throw you off the show.
  • Mental Health (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Herkum01 (592704) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:16PM (#23294506)

    I have to seriously wonder, is this man mentally ill? The only reason he receives any attention now was due to his previous work, but as the things he says and does keep getting stranger and stranger I have to wonder.

    In the US, people are only forcibly evaluated for mental illness under the most obvious conditions. If you have a person who is slowly slipping off the edge no one will do anything until he becomes an obvious problem. Even then it is usually be ignored unless he harms someone.

    It is quite possible that Jack Thompson is out of his mind. But no one will step in until after he has practically killed someone.

    • Re:Mental Health (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Akaihiryuu (786040) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:34PM (#23294652)
      Read the letter. There are only two possibilities: 1) He's dangerously insane. As in, he needs to be put in a room with padded walls and a straight jacket, and be drugged up on antipsychotics or 2) He's secretly on Take Two's payroll, and they're having him say/do outlandish things to get them publicity. He really is the best advertising they could ever hope for.
  • Whatever (Score:4, Insightful)

    by retro128 (318602) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:16PM (#23294510)
    John the Baptist wasn't a crank who got disbarred for filing frivolous lawsuits. Thompson is delusional. He seems to think that video games, and nothing else, is responsible for all of the world's evils. And when scripture starts getting quoted, you know you're in for some nutjobbery. The Bible verses were just over the top. And going to the mom? What the hell, is he trying to say "Hey Zelnick, I know where your mom lives. Muhahhaa"

    I'm sure there's going to be fallout from this. I eagerly await Zelnick's reply.
    • Re:Whatever (Score:4, Interesting)

      by NTmatter (589153) on Sunday May 04 2008, @05:03PM (#23294848) Homepage
      For factual reference, Thompson claims to not have sent it directly to the mother:

      "I sent it to Strauss Zelnick's attorney. I would never send it to his mother," Mr. Thompson told me.
      I'll take Thompson at his word that he sent it through the attorney...however, I suspect that this is not good-will, but a byproduct of the plausible notions that he was unable to find the address by any reasonable (eg, non-stalker) means, and that he probably realizes the potential PR nightmare that could be caused by actually sending the letter directly to the said family member.
  • by viking80 (697716) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:24PM (#23294584) Journal
    In GTA, you have free will. You can stay at home, go to work, maybe as a taxi driver?, drive to church on sundays, and never hurt anyone. That Jack Thompson becomes a criminal thug with disregard for the law and life, shows more about him than the game.
  • by copponex (13876) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:27PM (#23294602) Homepage
    Dear Mrs. Bush:

    Your son, as you may know (or maybe you don't know), is the President of the United States, whose most popular foreign policy adventures are killing hundreds of thousand of people. Though they are a different color, I do believe they are still people.

    Your son last week was reported to have said the following about Iran: "A nuclear Iran must not be allowed."

    Taking your son's thought, I would encourage you either to join the Marines, or encourage all of your grand-children to join up, especially Jenna and little Barbara.

    What you will see in the next war, if this iteration of war is anything like its predecessors, is incredible interactive violence aimed at everyone (whom you can shoot in the head and see the blood spray), innocent bystanders (whom you can run over with your Humvee or tank just for the heck of it), and of course the plentiful indigenous female prostitutes you can have sex with and then filet with a knife or stomp with your feet in order to get your money back. Experts note that the recent plethora of killings is caused in whole by your darling son's Administration and philosophical flunkies. There are four thousand dead soldiers in Iraq, and perhaps almost a million dead civilians. No, really - it was on 60 Minutes. I hope Bush has provided you with a flat screen TV to see the grief of the bereaved families that fills the screen. I mean, if reporters were allowed to say such things.

    The violence that your son trafficks in is the kind of stuff that most mothers would be ashamed to see their son putting into the hands of other mothers' children, but, hey, your son Bush has recently assured the world that he is "a Boy Scout, everybody knows that." I'd love to see the merit badges that Scout Troop handed out. Is there a Colonialism merit badge? If so, your loving son deserves one now.

    There's hundreds of thousands of mothers you would do well to talk to. They have a grief they carry every day that only a mother can know. There are other such mothers in the heartland of Iran whose inhabitants your son simply sees as commercial targets.

    Your son, this very moment, is doing everything he possibly can to sell the new Iran war, to "defend" a country in which your son claims you raised him to be "a Boy Scout." More like the Hitler Youth, I would say.

    Happy Mother's day, Mrs. Bush, which this year is May 11, and who knows how soon until your son or his predecessor unleash actual death and violence upon other mothers' boys. I'm sure you're very proud.
  • by gozu (541069) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:58PM (#23294820) Journal
    He sent a letter to the mother telling her that her son's game got perfect reviews. I stopped reading the article after that but I can only assume the remainder of the letter were Thompson's heartfelt congratulations and good wishes.

    Sheesh, can't Jack Thompson do nice things every once in a while?
  • by Opportunist (166417) on Sunday May 04 2008, @05:06PM (#23294864)
    Bluntly, that was the first thing that came to my mind. The question that McCarty was asked by Joseph Welch when he drove his communist witch hunt too far. Have you no shame?

    There are certain limits you don't cross. There are certain things you don't do, no matter what your agenda may be. Writing the mother of one of the people you 'fight' against and likening her son to Baldur von Schirach is one of them.

    If this proves anything, it's not that computer games, no matte what content, are bad, but that Jack Thompson is on a witch hunt. It has become obvious that his agenda isn't anymore to protect anyone. This isn't an attempt to end the sale of violent games. It is a direct attack on a person which isn't even in any way connected to the problem he allegedly has with those games. He claims he tries to protect people from psychologic damage these games allegedly do, but he himself caused psychologic damage to a person who doesn't even partake in the whole process of creating those games.

    So far, I didn't care too much about Jack Thompson. So far, he was a nut that tried to stop games from being sold. So be it. Whether those games exist, I don't really care. Now he is causing emotional harm to people who don't even have a connection with the game industry, except through some relative. Should we start harrassing his kids about their father's witchhunt?

    I wouldn't go down to that level. Punishment for the sins of your kin have been abolished in Germany since... well, given his choice of comparisons, Jack Thompson seems to know since when.
  • The real problem (Score:5, Insightful)

    by causality (777677) on Sunday May 04 2008, @06:11PM (#23295306)
    I don't fault Jack Thompson for having an opinion, even though I disagree with it and I believe it is utter horseshit.

    What I have a big problem with is the mentality shared by him and anyone else who thinks they know what's good for us: the unstated assumption that I am unable to decide for myself whether playing a video game is in my interests, and the unstated assumption that parents are incapable of deciding on their own whether their children are mature enough to handle the content of a video game. Basically, he's assuming that we are all mindless zombies with no choice but to imitate anything we see on a screen, and he's also trying to tell parents how they should raise their children, implying that they are unable to handle the job without his input. I assure you, no one who wants to do these things has a pure motive.

    The whole thing is an insult. It illustrates yet again the attitude that "it's not good enough that I choose to abstain from something; everybody else must do the same as me." It also assumes that no one is capable of distinguishing a fictional video game from reality, which is ironically more likely if we stop expecting people to know the difference.

    I am very thankful that my parents (within reason, of course) did not try to shelter me from every little objectionable thing in the world. Instead, they explained to me why something was right or wrong and equipped me to deal with an imperfect world that contains many things I might not like. If the Jack Thompsons of the world had their way, no one would be able to actually grow up into an adult human being who can deal with the world the way it is and perhaps try to make it a better place because every potential source of controversy would be censored. What he is advocating is really a form of cowardice, which is generally the motive behind those who would tell you how to live your life.
  • by jesterzog (189797) on Sunday May 04 2008, @08:52PM (#23296368) Homepage Journal

    There does seem to be a certain irony in writing to Mr Zelnick's mother to complain about his upbringing when Jack Thompson's main argument, as far as I can gather, is that violent media, including video games, are primarily responsible for violence in young people and society.

    If that's the case, why does he expect that she had anything to do with it? Surely she's as much a victim of a free state as all the other parents whose children are running wild and uncontrolled.

    • by Actually, I do RTFA (1058596) on Sunday May 04 2008, @04:22PM (#23294564)

      If you had the power to go back in time and beat Strauss Zelnick in front of his mother, would you?

      Is that the only reason I can go back in time? Can I take a few periodicals and mail them to myself? Because if answer to both questions is "yes" I would definately do that. I could always buy him France later to make it up to him.

    • [sarcasm] Yup. I couldn't possibly figure out how to rob, murder or carjack someone if I hadn't played GTA1 back in the day -- and the knowledge that driving a car [any car, even a stolen one] through a spraypainting facility will magically get the cops off my trail for anything I've ever done sure is handy. [/sarcasm]

      GTA isn't for kids, and I certainly think that cases where children are playing it are troubling (particularly for hours and hours on end, but that's true of any video game regardless of content), but the whole violent-videogames-cause-RL-violence meme is silly. It's much more defensible that individuals who are violent in nature are attracted to violent video games -- but I don't see how that's an argument for any kind of a ban, certainly not a strong enough argument to overcome the first-amendment counterpoint. Any rational individual knows that actions taken in real life have real consequences attached to them, and so evaluates such actions using a completely different metric than one might use in playing a game.

      So -- I won't complain about the consequences of violent video games being available for sale to adults, because I honestly believe that there are no substantial negative consequences on the scale described. If my family is (against all probability to the contrary) murdered in a random act of violence, I'll do the rational thing and blame the person who pulled the trigger, rather than searching for scapegoats. That said, violent videogames have permeated our society to the point that any real effects on the level of random violence should already be highly visible -- and while there's a highly publicized shooting spree here or there, (1) there's no clear causal correlation, and (2) the death rate from those isn't even close to background noise in the grand scheme of things; it's far, far more likely that my family will die in a random traffic accident, and that's a risk we willingly accept every time we get in the car to watch a movie or go to the store.

      Keep your fearmongering. If you want to live in a world where you're afraid of every kid who owns an Xbox, you're welcome to -- but me and mine prefer to go about living our lives (and facing much more real and present challenges), unworried by your imaginary and unrealized fears. I imagine those who were afraid of D&D or rock-and-roll felt similarly to you earlier in this century -- every generation finds some reason to worry needlessly about their youth -- but history proved those fears out as unfounded, and will do so again.
    • by Khyber (864651) <khyberkitsune@gmail.com> on Sunday May 04 2008, @06:26PM (#23295390) Journal
      Dead wrong, going to prison is the true training course in how to break the law. I got sent there and learned more about breaking and entering and bumpkeys and the manufacturing methods of methamphetamines and even more stuff than I'd have ever cared to know.