Slashdot Log In
House IP Leader Endorses P2P Blocking
Posted by
Soulskill
on Fri Mar 07, 2008 03:58 PM
from the peer-to-peer-prohibition dept.
from the peer-to-peer-prohibition dept.
Technical Writing Geek points out an Ars Technica report on comments from Representative Howard Coble (R-NC), who sits on the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property. In a recent editorial, Coble attempts to discourage P2P file sharing among young people, and praises Ohio University for its ban on P2P applications last year. Coble also suggests that identity theft is a great danger from file sharing. Public Knowledge is running a similar analysis, which argues against the main points from the editorial.
Related Stories
[+]
Technology: Ohio University Blocks P2P File Sharing 425 comments
After receiving the highest number of notices from the RIAA about P2P file sharing, Ohio University has announced a policy that restricts all fire sharing on the campus network. Some file-sharing programs that could trigger action are Ares, Azureus, BitTorrent, BitLord, KaZaA, LimeWire, Shareaza and uTorrent. Claiming that this effort is 'to ensure that every student, faculty member and researcher has access to the computer resources they need,' is this another nail in the coffin of internet freedom in American universities or a needed step to prevent illegal fire sharing?
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
ID Theft? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:ID Theft? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:ID Theft? (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm from Australia where they are always full and voting makes a difference.
Re:ID Theft? (Score:5, Insightful)
The media doesn't spread the news because they are owned by the same corporations that "contribute" heavily to both "mainstream candidates" (IE, both the Republican and Democrat wings of the Republicrat Party) in every major race.
When Nader was running as a "third party" (Green) candidate, he wasn't on the ballot in enough states to gain the Presidency even if he won every state he ran in, and the media slobbered all over him. The Libertarians were on the ballot in 49 states, yet the media said nary a word about him.
Your corporate overlords, most of whom are foreign (Sony, BP, Shell, etc) aren't about to let go of their power. We, the People, lost and lost big a long time ago.
That said, I still vote, but split my vote between "third party" candidates. Because voting for a candidate that will vote against your interests is worse than wasting a vote, it's just plain stupid. People don't stay away from the polls because they're apathetic, they stay away because they know they have no real voice. Both candidates against legalizing something you love? Why vote?
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No! That simply can't be it. It's apathy! Bad voter! BAD! There is absolutely no way it's due to having appalling choices or ones that are so similar to each other that they're effectively interchangeable. It also has nothing to do with an endless cycle of "whomever gets voted in winds up screwing the people" or politic
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, at least the kiddie-porn people would be stopped if there was no file sharing... right?
Well, at least Ms Spears would be able to pay her medical bills if there were no file sharing... there, we can all rest happy now.
WTF? This is just an attempt to make it seem ok to filter some things. Slowly but surely they will work on filtering everything for us so we won't have to worry about criminals - except thos
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:ID Theft? (Score:5, Funny)
"Think of the children" is the Congressional equivalent of the Jedi Mind Trick; "these are not the droids you're looking for." Upon further consideration, he may have substituted "Identity Theft" instead of "terrorists" since he's talking about the Interweb. I applaud his restraint in not using any analogy to tubes. This is progress.
Parent
Re:ID Theft? (Score:5, Interesting)
Then have more fun. Right click on one, browse host.
Watch in amazement as you now have access to their pictures, word documents, cookies, anything you might find interesting. All because they're too stupid to properly define the Sharing folders when they started using Limewire.
An ID theft's wet dream, all thanks to P2P.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:ID Theft? (Score:5, Informative)
Most of these people have some sort of P2P client installed such as Limewire.
Windows should warn you if you have your entire C: drive shared read/write to guest and open through the firewall. In fact, I think they should remove that capability all together. Guest never should have full read/write access to c:\.
Parent
Re:ID Theft? (Score:4, Informative)
'cos the idiot users don't realize they are sharing their entire disk.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So should we ban porn? Should we ban IE because it's easily exploited?
And while limewire and kazaa (and the many other programs) have a a good chance of infecting you, what of bit torrent, it's quite a bit safer. Why should it be banned when it's has so many good uses.
(Yes I realize you don't agree with the argument.)
Re: (Score:2)
just like guns (Score:5, Insightful)
We should outlaw cars too, look at all the people they kill.
I know this has nothing to do about murder, but they are blaming the technology for the crimes. If you get rid of P2P, something new will replace it.
Thats assuming you can get rid of P2P. P2P will not go away any time soon.
Re:just like guns (Score:5, Insightful)
Your comparison of gun and cars is a bit flawed, IMO. Guns were invented to take lives; that is their purpose in the universe. Whereas cars are tools that countless uses and, Death Race 2000 fantasy aside, none of them are to kill people. I don't want to start a flame war here, just something I noticed....
Parent
Re:just like guns (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Paper weight?
Using a gun is always a violent act.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:just like guns (Score:5, Insightful)
Paper weight?
Using a gun is always a violent act.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Why are there no substantial restrictions on the ownership of bows, crossbows, or even powered repeating crossbows? (the last is very fun to shoot)
Not only do they exist solely to kill, but they kill quieter than a silenced gun(which are generally illegal to own).
Re:just like guns (Score:5, Insightful)
From a strictly military standpoint, wounding an enemy is much, much more advantageous than killing him. It's one of the reasons NATO dropped from 7.62mm rounds to 5.56mm rounds - the smaller bullets tended to enter the target and tumble, causing more wounding. The 7.62mm rounds tended to pass straight through, meaning the most effective way to use it was to kill. Guns aren't designed to kill, they're designed to intimidate, often working even when no shots are fired or (if shots are fired) nobody is even hit. The decision to use the weapon to instead kill lies with the shooter.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Clueless legislators (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's see, that can apply to everything from raw sugar to automobiles. Quick, file legislation to make them all illegal!
Compromised Windows systems are being used to flood the internet with spam in violation of various state and federal laws. Outlaw Windows!
Why cant these congresscritters get it through their thick skulls that there are plenty of legitimate uses for P2P, even in a university environment. A university in Holland is using bittorrent to manage 6500 workstations [torrentfreak.com] and it's saving them time and money. The university I work at uses SystemImager [systemimager.org] on its high performance research cluster to manage the software on all the compute nodes. SystemImager supports the use of bittorrent as a transport mechanism. If these aren't legal, legitimate, and highly useful implementations of bittorrent then I don't know what is. These are just two working examples of P2P being used in university environments in responsible ways, but I'm sure those stuffed shirts in Washington could care less.
Re: (Score:2)
I find it easier to believe that the cluelessness is simply a temporary condition caused by big wads of money being put into their hands by shady lobby groups.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Just to play the devil's advocate: Could it be because the supposed benefits are outweighed by the known and (currently) uncontrollable abuses (piracy)? A poor analogy might be control of drugs. Certain drugs have benefits, but the negative abuses by the public encourage total prohibition. Yes, I know it doesn't stop people from doing drugs... but I'm sure it
Re:Clueless legislators (Score:5, Insightful)
Show me an independent report from a neutral party that shows the level of P2P piracy outweighs legitimate uses and I'd accept your argument. Better yet, show me that these idiots in Washington have read such a report.
I've already shown a couple valid uses for P2P. Here are a few others:
I bet that most people don't realize that by simply visiting popular websites like Google you're relying on P2P to some extent. They may not be using well known products like bittorrent or limewire but the data moving around the back end of search engines, the images you see on websites like Microsofts, and even the videos you watch on a site like youtube, are all distributed in part through P2P systems of some sort. They may be entirely custom built or they may rest on top of a protocol like bittorrent. The bottom line is that there's a lot of data being transferred legally via P2P for a number of purposes. I bet if somebody could come up with a realistic and impartial set of numbers you'd be surprised at how much legitimate P2P traffic there is compared to illegal P2P traffic.
Parent
Many Don't Seem to Understand (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Many Don't Seem to Understand (Score:5, Insightful)
And you're helping them fight us.
BTW, I'm a geezer.
It's said that if you're a conservative when you're young you have no heart. If you're a liberal when you're old you have no brains. I'd say if you consider yourself boxed into outdated ideas like "liberal" and "conservative" you have neither brains nor heart.
When I was in my tewnties, marijuana was going to be legal as soon as my generation got in power. Well, so much for THAT generational battle!
Parent
e-mail (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Heck with it, let's just ban computers altogether! Are you with me?
Oh, wait...
Re: (Score:2)
Windows (For being easy to compremize and turn into a bot)
Apache (For hosting some identity theft websites)
Linux (For running Apache)
Unix (For also running Apache)
OS X (For being Unix)
Any text editor/word processor (For giving the criminals the ability to type fradulant websites)
You must be this smart to ride this ride (Score:4, Funny)
Really? Identity theft over P2P? Anyone who identity is so weak they could lose it by grabbing a torrent of Ubuntu probably has bigger problems than this congressdroid wants to address.
They did this (Score:2, Informative)
No surprises here (Score:5, Informative)
Hrm, who do I see here? The RIAA, ASCAP, the National Association of Broadcasters, and the American IP Law Association, all in his top 10.
The only surprise here is how long it's taken him to get around to taking care of them...
God bless America (Score:2)
Why stop there? (Score:3, Interesting)
Or write-able drives? Or photocopiers? Or word of mouth... Or books.. Hell, lets ban knowledge.
Blocking is USELESS (Score:3, Informative)
Sadly (Score:4, Insightful)
when will they get it? (Score:5, Insightful)
Its one thing for some old politician to not properly understand the technology that he is trying to ban, but one would think a university would be better educated than to assume ALL p2p traffic must be copyright infringment.
Is this the best trolls can do these days? (Score:3, Insightful)
Because in the latter example, you're stealing material property. That crime is called theft. In the former example, you're copying data illegally -- that crime is called copyright infringement, and the difference is that nobody was deprived of a physical copy of the merchandise. Thievery me