Slashdot Log In
Sears Installs Spyware
Posted by
kdawson
on Thu Jan 03, 2008 11:35 AM
from the naughty-naughty dept.
from the naughty-naughty dept.
Gandalf_the_Beardy writes in with news that's been around a while but is getting more attention lately. Last month Benjamin Googins, a security researcher at CA, determined that Sears Holding Corp. installed ComScore spyware without adequate disclosure. Sears said, yes we tell people about tracking their browsing. On Jan. 1 spyware researcher Ben Edelman weighed in, noting that Sears' notice occurs on page 10 of a 54-page privacy statement, and twits Sears because its installation identifies the software as "VoiceFive" and later claims it's coming from a company called "TMRG, Inc." even though a packet sniffer confirms the software belongs to ComScore, adding "These confusing name-changes fit the trend among spyware vendors."
Related Stories
[+]
FCC Declines To Probe Disclosure of Phone Records 97 comments
An anonymous reader writes "News.com reports that the FCC won't be investigating the phone record disclosures by communications companies under US government pressure. Despite a congressional request for that probe, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin quashed the inquiry based on comments from National Intelligence Director Michael McConnell. 'At issue are reports last year that some big telephone companies allowed the U.S. government access to millions of telephone records for an antiterrorism program. The reports have prompted scrutiny by the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Democratic Rep. Edward Markey, the chairman of a key Energy and Commerce subcommittee, asked Martin to investigate. Markey, of Massachusetts, said McConnell's stance was "unsurprising given that this administration has continually thwarted efforts by Congress to shed more light on the surveillance program."'"
[+]
UK ISP Admitted to Spying on Customers 163 comments
esocid writes "BT, an ISP located in the UK, tested secret spyware on tens of thousands of its broadband customers without their knowledge, it admitted yesterday. The scandal came to light only after some customers stumbled across tell-tale signs of spying. At first, they were wrongly told a software virus was to blame. BT said it randomly chose 36,000 broadband users for a 'small-scale technical trial' in 2006 and 2007. The monitoring system, developed by U.S. software company Phorm, formerly known as 121Media, known for being deeply involved in spyware, accesses information from a computer. It then scans every website a customer visits, silently checking for keywords and building up a unique picture of their interests. Executives insisted they had not broken the law and said no 'personally identifiable information' had been shared or divulged."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Sears is evil. (Score:5, Informative)
Now he works for a small appliance/TV repair shop, and he absolutely loves it. Just another reason to flip the bird to big corporations - they don't care about people, they care about money. The spyware installation on their own customers' computer systems is just one small example.
Re:Sears is evil. (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Sears is evil. (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyway, someone asked the manager for Sunday off, the manager said "sure, find someone to switch with you." The employee did one better and just switched his name on the board with someone else, without asking anyone.
So the person who has been switched realizes their now working six days in a row without being consulted, go to the manager, and the manager says "well so-and-so isn't working, so you need to find someone to cover." Somewhere I hear about this and mutter "isn't this the manager's job" and everyone just looks at me like I'm an idiot.
This snowballs. I show up, a trainee, during a heavily promoted sale, as the only "associate" (Can't I be a freakin' employee) working the electronics floor for four hours. I can't ring up sales. So I tell people the truth. I also tell them about other locations in the mall where they can find the product they're looking for. And you know what, about 30% came back to me later to buy the stuff when they knew I could ring up sales. One person even told the manager that I was the best employee he'd seen at that store and I bent over backwards to make him happy even if he didn't buy from me, and that if I wasn't there whenever he came in, he wouldn't buy from the store at all.
So now the manager was not happy with me because I made him and the other employees "look bad", to quote him.
I drove into work on that seventh day, and it was an absolute mad house. Big sale, horribly understocked (1 new computer, 3 floor models, about 25 people wanting them) and the manager starts telling me how he needs me on the floor.
So I look at the chaos that his scheduling and his lack of proper planning created, looked him in the eye, told him I quit, and walked out the door.
Shame I had to throw away that 3-cent commission on the big screen TV.
Parent
Re:Sears is evil. (Score:4, Funny)
BIG mistake.
What you should have done is tell him you quit, and then stick around to observe the carnage until asked to leave.
Parent
Re:Sears is evil. (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Will they push the extended warranty on you at the point of sale? Of course. So does just about everyone in a decently sized store.
If they didn't care about people as much as most Slashdotters think most corporations don't care about people, they wouldn't bother with the quality products. Of course, this doesn't absolve spying on their customers (time to turn of Javascr
Re:Sears is evil. (Score:4, Interesting)
Quality products = better reputation = more customers = more profits. Even good customer service equates directly to more customers and more profits. It has nothing to do with caring about customers. I work for a large credit card company, that before it was bought out, had a horrible reputation and customers were leaving in droves. Then the first buyout occurred, and our call center advisors were told all about how they had to start being sympathetic to the customers and make good impressions. And lo! customers started coming back, once the customer service reputation improved.
While there are some /employees/ in the large corporations who actually care about the customers, the ones making the executive decisions literally care only insofar as it affects the bottom line. If it was more profitable to sell crappy products and give shit service, Sears would be first in line to start doing that.
Parent
Re:Sears is evil. (Score:5, Insightful)
In fact, the Sears I worked at (in Houston) went out of their way to accommodate us (most of us high school or college students at the time). The supervisors were, for the most part, reasonable to work with, and nobody put undue demands on us to perform. I wasn't commissioned sales, but I probably knew everybody in the store, and I don't recall anybody relating horror stories like those mentioned already.
I'm not saying the stories related here didn't happen...but let's be fair: Mod up four or five "negative" stories without counterbalance?
Oh, wait, this is
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Just so happens that you're the only one who's counter-balanced so far. That would lead me to believe that there are many more negative stories about Sears than not...until other people decide to speak up, of course.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
One of the first things we learned is (a series of studies they did said) people are 10x more likely to be vocal about a negative experience than a positive one. I would imagine that's just as true on the employee perspective as it is the customer's side. People usually don't talk about how their boss pretty much met their expectations, just like they don't go around bragging that the toaster they got
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
O
Re:Sears is evil. (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course, the obvious way to avoid problems like these is to not sign up for such things in the first place. How many people receive an actual benefit by signing up for this kind of service?? I'd bet the number is somewhere between zero and two.
Parent
What is Sears Looking For? (Score:5, Interesting)
I would love to meet the decision maker that believes this is morally permissive act that can be "contracted" through an EULA.
Re:What is Sears Looking For? (Score:4, Interesting)
They link up with a spyware company, get people to sign up for a community or whatever, then rake in the user data that is generated from their browsing. There may or may not be any specific danger to an individual user, and most of the gathered data is probably used in an aggregate sense, but the problem lies in the fact that no one knows what's there, how it's gathered, coded, or stored, and how secure it is.
I wonder if a SHC Community member has their identity stolen because of weak software programming on the spyware company if that company can be held liable, or if there's a clause in there that absolves them of any real responsibility regarding the security of the data being collected.
Parent
Re:What is Sears Looking For? (Score:5, Informative)
Now that's almost criminal.
Parent
Re:What is Sears Looking For? (Score:4, Interesting)
The Sears VP responsible for this is a former VP of comScore. http://community.ca.com/blogs/securityadvisor/archive/2008/01/02/2nd-response-to-rob-harles-vp-of-sears-shc-community.aspx [ca.com] (last paragraph of the post).
Somethin' sure does smell funny round bouts here.
Parent
Re:What is Sears Looking For? (Score:5, Insightful)
Surely, you're kidding right?
Large companies operate on what is legally permissible. If current case law says you can legally put any bullshit into an EULA and have it be valid, that's the bar.
They don't give a flying crap about morally OK -- it's irrelevant.
Companies are impersonal entities, managed by people with a profit motive to maximize their bonuses by doing what they can do to maximize shareholder value in the short term. Morality doesn't apply if the lawyers tell them it was legal.
Cheers
Parent
Re:What is Sears Looking For? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Screwed Up (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Screwed Up (Score:4, Funny)
In my opinion this is worse than the "communities" some e-com sites have you join that secretly charge your card $2 a month, at least that you see on your CC statement.
Those "communities", my friend, are called "porn websites"
Parent
This is Sear's Privacy Statement (Score:4, Funny)
Re:This is Sear's Privacy Statement (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
What a deal! (Score:5, Funny)
Cue Sony Parallels (Score:2, Insightful)
What does SEARS need with this info? Honestly, this just smells bad. I won't call them evil just yet but this is pretty serious from a privacy POV.
Also, isn't it about time we push for a law that makes these privacy agreements shorter and in english (not legalese). One thing I like about CC is that they have a layman's terms version of all their licenses as well as the legalese ones. Not only would people be more likely to read them but it makes it hard for companies to bury important info several pages d
Plain English (Score:2)
What we need is Plain English legislation, generally. If a law, contract, or other legal document cannot be understood by a person of average intelligence and reasonable education, it is null and void.
Yeah, I know the lawyers would hate it. Tough.
...laura
Re:Plain English (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Part of a general trend: consumer as commodity (Score:5, Interesting)
This is a fairly obvious example of what has happened to the concept of "the customer" in the retail space. The old principle of serving the customer still applies, but the identification of the customer has changed. The customers of K-Mart Sears are no longer the people buying products in stores and use the Sears website; the new customer is the stockholder. The people who buy products and use the website are just commodities to be traded like anything else.
Installing spyware on website users? Why not, if the website users are just inventory to be controlled and traded.
This is true not only in retail, but in IT. Do you think the people who actually buy, say, operating systems, are the customers of the software companies that make them? Think again. Their customers are their stockholders too. The purchaser is just a commodity. Maybe companies which commoditize consumers need a wake-up call to remind them that consumers are still the real customers. A PR mess like this sends a bit of a reminder, but the only message that really hits home is one that impacts the EPS.
Re:Part of a general trend: consumer as commodity (Score:5, Insightful)
This is true of any publicly traded company. How or what that company does to produce max profits for its shareholders is a different matter...
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Part of a general trend: consumer as commodity (Score:4, Insightful)
You're like...completely right (in my opinion).
To expand on the economic side a bit, the stock holders own shares of publicly traded companies because they believe those companies will earn profit and grow in the future. Investment is a beautiful but risky thing. A company that no longer maintains the ability to expand and sell more widgets/services will not realize the growth needed to bring a return on the investments. That means a company like Sears always needs to expand and sell more and more stuff in order to compensate for the "interest" that must be paid out to the investors. Basically, investors will pull out if a company can't realize a certain growth in share value, so the company must grow. Hence, it is reasonable for the company to try and push spyware on to products they sell, because it opens them up to a new customer base--advertising companies willing to pay to gain access to marketing information people's computers. Companies who's cash is 'borrowed' from investors will always face this problem. They can't afford not to grow.
Do I lay blame to these "evil" companies for trying to screw over the consumer? Some of it is their fault, but I tend to also (read: not entirely) lay blame the consumer for making spam, spyware, rootkits, etc. profitable. Just as companies have an ethical code we more or less hold them to, consumers also must take responsibility and understand that their choices also effect change in the marketplace.
I really like supporting companies like Google and Whole Foods whose management teams profess to see value in giving back to the community. I also respect individuals who understand that the only way large, evil companies can seem to rule the world is if the majority of a society tolerate them. And if the majority of the society is not willing to tolerate these companies, then they won't buy the crapware filled computers, and no laws are needed. If the majority of the society is willing to tolerate these companies, than "Democracy" has failed.
Basically, I find that a society that needs huge amounts of laws above and beyond basic things like anti-trust in order to keep corporations in check will end up having a bunch of citizens who can't make responsible decisions for themselves. That means that such a society cannot support a democracy. Scary thought to me.
Parent
I Didn't Know Anybody Still Shopped at Sears (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Surprised that Sears is still in business? (Score:2)
They've been slowly going out of business for years as their clueless
management phases out of retail products and services and whiles away
its days with speculative [thestreet.com]
investments. Now, maybe they're going into the spyware
or pop-up advertising business to cash in on the dot com
boom. Sears is the poster boy for the pointy-hair boss in
Dilbert.
Re:Surprised that Sears is still in business? (Score:5, Funny)
I'll be goddamned if I'm going to buy TWO hammers during this lifetime.
Parent
New FTC rules should state . . . (Score:3, Funny)
Tell StopBadware.org (Score:5, Informative)
StopBadware [stopbadware.org] should hear about this. It's exactly the sort of thing that gets a company a big red X on the StopBadware site. Plus some really bad publicity.
StopBadware is sponsored by Harvard Law School, Oxford University, and Consumers' Union. There's heavy legal firepower available if needed.
Really just another reason... (Score:2)
When the corporations decide that getting caught doing dumb/unethical/improper stuff costs them more than whatever the stuff was going to get them, then this will stop.
Until then, one more corporation to put on my do-not-shop list. For a very long time...
Now we know that and ... nothing will change. (Score:2)
Well, we won't shop there anymore, maybe. But bankrupcy? Hardly. How many people know about that? A hundreth of a percent? Maybe? How many care about it? Even less?
"So Sears tracks my online surfing? So what? I got nothing to hide, and their stuff is so CHEAP!"
That's what you'll hear as the reply of Joe Average. People have not discovered yet that their privacy actually does have some value. Unfortunately, corporations have. Not only a value, th
Nobody checked his resume? (Score:4, Interesting)
CA's Benjamin Googins is being diplomatic, of course. If the guy in charge of the "community" was previously a senior VP at the spyware company, then he clearly has a vested interest in the continued success of comScore.
If this were happening in a government agency, there would rightly be cries of conflict of interest. So much for the "perfection" of the free market over the ebil gubbermint...
FWIW, I haven't stepped foot in a Sears in about 5 years, when I needed a spark plug socket, and I can't recall my last purchase before that. And I've rarely been in a K-Mart since they closed most of their Texas stores -- the ones in other states still suck just as hard as they did before the buyout, but it's hard to compare one strong vacuum against another.
Virus signature ID: Sears.ComScore (Score:2)
Then again, Sears' lawyers may request to have it changed to Sears®.ComScore.
Things to know about Sears (Score:3, Informative)
And now with this story, maybe it's time to stop even trying. (I had a minor loyalty to Kmart because I'm originally from their part of the country; and to Sears because the Craftsman guarantee policy is good.)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Sears is a trusted brand. They are using the trust to abuse consumers.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)