Slashdot Log In
Dell Found Guilty of Fraud, False Advertising
Posted by
timothy
on Wed May 28, 2008 02:17 PM
from the among-other-things dept.
from the among-other-things dept.
Last year, the Attorney General of New York instigated a lawsuit against Dell for practices like long hold times, repeated call transfers, and disconnects for customers waiting for phone support — all of which make it harder to cash in on promises of (and paid-for) technical support." Now, raptor78 writes "IDG News reports on New York Attorney General's victory over the poor services and deceptive practices employed by Dell over the past years with regards to technical support and promotional offers. It is about time someone spoke up and realized some of the horrors people deal with at Dell." Another reader points to a quick report from Fortune magazine on the ruling.
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
It's just business? (Score:5, Funny)
I like this quote at the end of the article. Are they ha ha only serious?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That, unfortunately, is becoming the norm with MegaCorps. Verizon is the same way [lets get them next].
You know all those people following the Verizon guy around - "The Network"? I think I get transferred to every one of them just to get a bill straightened out or a service changed. If you want to add a phone line, they'll get you one that afternoon, but forget about anything looking like good service.
The Verizon Techs themselves are great, by the way.
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Interesting)
I found a great way to deal with the "sales-pitch-when-you're-trying-to-cancel-service" routine...
Growl.
Seriously...growl.
When they start the sales pitch, just start growling to yourself softly, and increase the volume every few seconds or so. It's funny as hell to hear them break off nervously in the middle of the pitch, and gives you the space to ask "Do you need any other info to complete the disconnection?" If they repeat, just do it again. I've yet to see/hear the marketer that can complete a pitch whilst hearing this...
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Funny)
Tangential to this is dealing with Telemarketers. I do the "We Don't Use That" method which I found on the Internet somewhere - and it works:
TM: How much copier toner do you need today?
ME: We don't use copiers.
TM: You don't? How about printers?
ME: We don't print anything either. Not one printer here.
TM: Oh... Ok, then have a nice day.
TM: You've won 4 days and 3 nights at Time Share Harbor in Orlando.
ME: Sorry, I can't travel. I'm under house arrest for the next eight years.
TM: Oh... uh... sorry to bother you. Goodbye.
TM: Hi, I'm with MegaTeleNet and we can aggregate all your phone and Internet services
ME: We don't use Internet and this is a payphone.
TM: Don't use Internet? How does your business survive without Internet?
ME: Don't need it - all of our customers are walk-ins.
TM: Oh... sorry to bother you. Goodbye.
TM: Hi, we can save your business thousands of dollars with our new light bulbs.
ME: We don't use light bulbs here.
TM: You don't? How do you see anything?
ME: Everything here is natural lighting and we leave at dusk.
TM: Oh... sorry to bother you. Have a nice day.
TM: Would you like to save a bundle on long distance?
ME: We don't use any long distance service.
TM: You don't make any long distance calls?
ME: No, all of our customers are local.
TM: Oh... sorry to bother you.
Of course the correct answer to the last one is "We use Skype."
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I'm a sysadmin, and have worked with Dell and their systems for the last 10 years.
I find they generally have a lower failure rate than other manufacturers I have used in the past, and their tech support has been second to none. I call them up, I get someone in North America, I explain what the problem is and how I've reached my diagnostic conclusion, and I have the par
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Informative)
To offer a counter-point, my last place of work saw regular failures with our Dell server equipment. My personal favorite was when the SQL Server database went offline and no one could figure out why. At first it appeared to be a disk failure. But if that was the case, why didn't the RAID array continue working with the other drives? Turns out, the RAID controller failed. Corrupted all the data on the disks, too. We had to pull the previous day's backup and apologize to customers that the day's data had been lost. (Thankfully it happened on a Saturday.)
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Interesting)
I've had printer techs who couldn't take a printer apart. I've had server technicians who couldn't handle basic terminology. I had hours and hours of sitting on the phone with optiplex capacitor problems trying to convince them to just fricking replace the motherboard like they claimed they were doing on their website. This is fricking GOLD corporate support here! I'm glad they got nailed, they richly deserved it.
Just as a footnote, we switched to HP about 18 months ago, and I have no idea what their customer service is like because we haven't had to call it yet.
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:4, Informative)
We, obviously, recommend Dell to pretty much all our clients. The failure rate for individual machines and components is about what I'd expect from any manufacturer.
Their technical support is generally OK for the business-grade stuff (like your GOLD support) and crap for home customers. But I won't rave about it. I've been on the phone with absolute morons entirely too many times.
We'd get sent out on calls to work on their printers because were were authorized and someone had taken the test... But we weren't given any special technical documentation. So we had no better idea where the parts were located inside any given printer than the end-user did.
Eventually it got too frustrating and we stopped doing the service calls.
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:4, Insightful)
I can attest to this - I worked for Dell for three years until they just recently shut down our call center (the Edmonton site, in Canada - curse our rising dollar!). For the past year my job was to field calls from the onsite technicians Dell sends out to fix laser printers. They'd call in having no idea what they were supposed to do, and would frequently make the problem worse in their struggles, prompting me to replace the whole printer rather than trying to replace the parts the tech broke, since it would just be the same inexperienced/untrainable tech going back out with the new parts. It wasn't always a training or documentation issue either though, these contracted locals were often bottom-of-the-barrel labor force types that had no concept of basic troubleshooting. You get what you pay for.
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:4, Insightful)
As far as quality of the actual systems goes, all of the pieces, if not the final assembly, are done by ASUS, Foxconn and a handful of other overseas companies. Dell and HP are marketing and distribution companies.
Anecdotal evidence of support problems will not prove a case either way. Statistically all of the major hardware companies are very similar. Shipments to support cases is around 4%.
The reason everyone (and I do mean everyone) has shitty support. Is that tech support is a shit job. Anyone who has ever worked the phones will tell you this. Most techs last around 6 months to a year. Consumer support, speaking with the unwashed masses, 8 to 12 hours a day, trying to squeeze bits of useful information out of the lady on the other end of the line who thinks her monitor is her computer. Who installed Microsoft Live Support AND Norton 360 with all the addons even though their system with Preloaded with McAfee. The guy sticking floppy disks in jewel cases and shoving them in the CD drive. Angry people trying to get you too pay their phone bill because they downloaded a porn dialer. The guy with wire snips trying to cut his AGP video card to make it fit in a PCI Express slot. Who is pissed off because everyone keeps telling him he can't.
*twitch*
Anyone that even comes close to having a clue will find a better job. I promise.
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Interesting)
The small business at which I work purchases Dells in low volume, and has a few smaller Dell servers (really, glorified NAS units). Their support for our company has been exceptional. Just troll through my posts to see that I am absolutely not a Dell shill - I dislike Windows, I dislike Dell supplied crapware, I think their systems are ugly, and I would never personally purchase a Dell. However, all those things aside, corporate and server support is truly excellent at Dell. When I have problems (which is comparatively rare), I get personally attention, overnight shipping of replacements, people who speak flawless English, and courteous follow-ups after the problem has presumably been solved.
One might claim that, by supporting their small-business clients well, it makes their poor consumer support all the more inexcusable - I won't argue that point one way or the other. All I can say that is that there are support sub-infrastructures at Dell that are excellent.
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Informative)
Based on personal experience, you'd win that bet.
Laptop my boss purchased for personal use, Latitude (well, consumer line...I don't recall if that's the Latitude or not). Busted keyboard. Literally ended up taking MONTHS to get it replaced.
Stupid techs never listened to the diagnostics, best part was it got shipped to a repair depot, they turn it on, "Computer turns on fine. User needs to type password in." was the return. NEVER actually typed anything otherwise they'd see the keys jam and repeat.
Fortunatly, since the initial issue was placed before the warranty expired, all work was done under warranty (even though it was finally fixed 4 months AFTER the expiration date.)
However, on our Optiplexes and Inspirons, service is all but flawless. PowerEdge support is like five nines of satisfaction, and the PowerVault tape loaders? Best. Support. EVER. They'll literally bend over backwards to support those devices.
I cannot, for the life of me, recall one single instance where I have been completely disappointed by Dell support on our business class products, and we've had to call in about 40 LCDs, 40 HDs, 30 PSUs, and single digit quantities of mobos, cd-rom drives, RAM, and LTO tapes.
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Interesting)
On the one hand, at no point was I ever encouraged to give less than anything but the highest quality service. There was no "nudge, nudge, wink, wink" about getting customers off the phone without really helping them, no prodding - subtle or otherwise - to cut corners. We were required to stay on a call for as long as it took to get it right, even though call times were of course monitored.
However, they treated us like crap. Although Dell had put a fair amount of time into training the techs, we were treated like service employees rather than technical professionals, and there were never enough people. Trust me, when you, as a customer, were sitting on hold for hours at a time, it wasn't because the call center folks were goofing off or whatever. It's because we were backed up like you wouldn't believe, because Dell was too cheap to hire enough technicians.
I worked for Dell tech support, and I've had three friends who did as well. There was/is absolutely no conspiracy to deny customers their service - on an individual-call level, Dell demands high quality performance from its techs. However, there was/is systemic disregard for the techs, their expertise, and their workloads, which led to, naturally, a shortage of highly qualified individuals (meaning that in many cases, Dell could only hire marginally qualified people, like myself), which exacerbated hold times as well as lowered the quality of service once the customer got a technician to talk to. There were also some glitches in the system as far as how transfers between departments were handled.
Customers never *intentionally* received the short shrift at Dell. We were all working as hard as we could. But poor employment practices often undercut customer service.
Parent
Re:It's just business? (Score:5, Interesting)
Where things fell short was in the quality of people that they chose. The Gold Technical Support team was advertised as the equivilant of Tier II consumer support at Tier I. The ad for the job indicated that 'advanced technical skill' was a requirement. I thought that I could put my skills to use in such an environment, and it wouldn't be like the wonderful folks I worked with at HP DeskJet support while I was in college.
When I got there, it was apparent that they were picking these people up off the street by driving up next to them, slinging a bag over their head, and dragging them to the training classes. If you could breathe through your mouth and manage to read a script, you were good enough to be on the front lines of Dell's premier technical support.
Once you were inside, things changed. If you went over the desired average call time, you would have a Tier II standing at your desk, asking if they could "help" so you could move on to the next person. It wasn't because call time was so much a strict requirement as much as we always were 150+ deep in queue, and there was a two minute answer time guarantee. Of course, the center was only ever half-full, with 350 people on-duty for freaking Monday morning, and more than half of those employed because they had a pulse and could read. The return for this sojurn in paradise was a pool table in the break room, and a sandwich machine that only ever seemed to have ancient egg salad sandwiches in it. Needless to say, I escaped.
Now, as an IT admin, I choose Dell because I know how to game the system to get what I need, when I need it, every time. I have no illusions as to the inherent quality of their wares, and I would never purchase something from the consumer side of things.
I also never, ever call on Monday.
Parent
This is a no-brainer (Score:5, Interesting)
p.s. the accent comment also means any strong accent, even southern or north eastern ones. Strong accents are, however, easier to find outside of the country.
Re:This is a no-brainer (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This is a no-brainer (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:This is a no-brainer (Score:4, Funny)
Customers? Fuck the customers. Who needs customers? Customers are a dime a dozen. There are six billion prospective customers on this planet and there are more customers born every day.
That's the 21st century way of doing business.
As to the accent, you won't find many American accents that can't be parsed by someone in America. The accent has two bad things in people's minds. First, when you call someone for support you expect them to speak the language that you used to buy the product, and what's more to speak it fluently and understandably.
Second, if the phone jockey has a foreign accent, the person calling for support is reminded that the thieving, unpatriotic bastards they bought the product from are shipping American jobs overseas. Nobody likes a traitor, and an "American" company that ships jobs overseas is seen by working people as traitorous. Because you know, it IS traitorous. Only a traitor sells out his native country for filthy lucre.
Parent
Re:This is a no-brainer (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Triumph or tragedy? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Triumph or tragedy? (Score:5, Insightful)
Whenever one company is held accountable it makes it easier for others to be held accountable.
Anyway, the class action suits do a decent job of holding big pharma in check. Juries just don't give out the same awards because your computer repair was a couple of days late.
Parent
Re: (Score:3)
So holding a company accountable is a bad thing because they didn't hold every company accountable at the same time?
Whenever one company is held accountable it makes it easier for others to be held accountable.
Anyway, the class action suits do a decent job of holding big pharma in check. Juries just don't give out the same awards because your computer repair was a couple of days late.
1) Dell tech support isn't half bad.
2) You think that "big pharma" is currently "in check?" The insane markups and massive profiteering that occur at the expense of millions of lives a year are the happy result of our effective class action lawsuits? Just checking.
Dell guy quoteth: (Score:5, Funny)
The sad thing about fines is (Score:4, Interesting)
IMHO, the fines levied should be something like 3x profits from bad behavior so that we get around this "fines as a cost of doing business" mentality.
Parent
Not my experience (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Not my experience (Score:5, Interesting)
You also have the "higher-class" business line in the Latitude and not the "lower-class" lines such as the Inspiron or the Vostro. My experience has shown that just this small difference in PC selection can make a huge difference in quality of service.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
maybe people with lesser maintenance contracts and whatnot get the runaround.
Yep.
I've dealt with Dell both as a home user (my wife's old laptop, now she uses a Mac) and as a corporate customer. There is a world of difference between the two. Their special line for big-money users is really worlds different from their oft-complained-about home user's customer support
When I represented the big contract, I gave the first guy I talked to an ID number, then was transferred to a friendly support representative. I explained my problem (four failed hard drives--in one month, no less,
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
My aunt bought an Inspiron in Malaysia, to use in NZ where she lives, and I told her to go for the "Complete Cover" thing. Sure Dell's "Complete Cover" _might_ be overpriced etc etc, but I figured it would be less hassle than getting the notebook insured, successfully getting a claim and getting whatever problem fixed. A
Wrong ad for the article (Score:4, Funny)
On the way to rtfa, a full-screen Dell ad popped up.
Or perhaps, the software is very, very clever and Dell was trying to discourage me from continuing on to read the article.
Good. (Score:5, Interesting)
In the end they decided to just replace it, told me to send the old one back when the new one was delivered but the courier guy said he only had a drop off.
I phoned Dell 3 times over the next 6 months to collect it and they told me the courier would be there on certain days yet never arrived yet I've never once had a courier let me down here despite using them like once or twice a week for the last 8 years so it was blatantly them not organising it.
After that period Dell decided to threaten me for not letting them have the laptop back by charging my card used for the original purchase 2 years prior for the new laptop despite me making every attempt to get it back to them and them not actually being arsed to properly arrange to collect it. When it came to it cost me a sizeable amount of cash in phone bills, hours on the phone trying to sort it out,
Worst company EVER. It's just a shame they didn't get a harder kicking than this. They used to be awesome, now I wouldn't touch them ever again no matter how able they are to improve because I went in to their service buying the laptop when they were still half-decent and watch them devolve into sheer incompetence and worthlessness over the next few years at which point as unfortunately needed their assistance as above.
Other practices I've noticed they used not mentioned here in the UK is they advertise really good offers on some hardware but when you phone up to purchase it when it's a phone only offer they say the offer doesn't really exist and try and sell you it for up to £100 more, I spoke to trading standards and they said they can do this as long as they sell at least some laptops for the offer price, even if that's only to 2 people in a population of 60 million despite blatantly infering that the offer is open to everyone until the end of the offer data.
All that said, I'm not sure there's really a better option out there for things like laptops either - all the major tech companies seem just as bad.
I hope the 'next day on site' counts... (Score:5, Interesting)
Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Insightful)
That kind of thing is much better handled by the system in place now.
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Interesting)
Why present a false dichotomy? Are you so intellectually bankrupt and slavishly devoted to your dogma of greed-driven, unrestricted capitalism that you can't think up any possible alternatives?
Or maybe you just think the status quo is just peachy?
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Which car company do you work for? (Score:5, Funny)
A major one.
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Informative)
If you believe that Ford motor company has the intent to commit murder, you are welcome to your opinion, however illogical it may be.
And I thought I was a conspiracy theorist.
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, whatever happens to the corps, the board members get to eat the penalties (e.g. Enron's board members being held criminally liable in proportion to involvement, etc).
I rather like the idea of the Corporate Death Penalty... sell off|dissolve|split the creature, and hold each individual board member civilly and/or criminally liable. If a CEO knows that no golden parachute will save his ass from being forcibly separated from his personal possessions and money, maybe he'll think a little before deciding to perpetrate fraud, monopolistic predations, and etc.
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:4, Interesting)
This is a pet peeve of mine, so I'll apologize in advance for the rant, but I think the idea of a so-called corporate death penalty, or revoking the corporate charter, is just a bad idea in general.
Why? Simple -- it gives corporate decision makers, i.e. the real, flesh and blood people actually responsible for these types of problems, an easy-out of the mess they created. The corporate death penalty is, it seems to me, just a giant grant of absolution for corporate officers who are, in many cases, committing out-and-crimes.
Think about it; did Enron's corporate charter, i.e. the legal fiction we once collectively called Enron the company, commit massive financial fraud? No. Kenneth Lay, Jeffery Skilling and the other directors of Enron deceived the public and their investors about Enron's true state of financial affairs. These individuals committed the crime. The corporate charter had no part in the affair. Does revoking the corporate charter affect Enron's decision makers in any way, forcing them to accept responsibility for their actions? No. What it does is get them off the hook for any personal financial responsibility to the investors they defrauded.
This I think is a bad idea. Acquitting the criminals and focusing on the legal entity as the responsible party does nothing to detour this type of behavior in the future.
Revoking the corporate charter in situations like the Enron debacle only shifts blame away from the individuals responsible for the bad conduct. In addition, killing the corporate entity hurts the investors and the regular employees of the corporation, the folks who, in most part, had little to do with the fraud involved. The employees are now suddenly out of a job and the investors, the real targets of the fraud in the Enron case, are now left with nothing, having been bilked by Lay and Skilling and now, with the imposition of corporate death penalty, further harmed by the public at large. Is that what we want? Does killing the legal facade of a corporation really serve any purpose except to make us feel better when we associate the name 'Enron' with billions of dollars lost to overstated earnings and financial fraud?
In the end, the people running Enron created the mess that sank the company. The investors paid the price; they saw their hard-earned money literally vanish overnight. Revoking Enron's corporate charter wouldn't have fixed this problem. If we want revenge for the crime, we should go after the people who committed the fraud -- the former directors of the company. The corporate charter is just a legal smokescreen, and it should be treated as such.
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:4, Interesting)
Why would the employees be out of a job just because the corporate charter is dissolved? The board, officers and stockholders would be rightfully fucked, but all that infrastructure isn't going to just disappear.
How about you keep your mouth closed until your brain is engaged, so you don't look like a fucking clown in public?
Parent
Re:Dude! Yer gettin' a slap on the wrist. (Score:5, Informative)
Martha Stewart was not incarcerated for anything that her corporation did. She was incarcerated for lying under oath regarding a completely different company - ImClone. In the ImClone case she wasn't an officer of the company, but a mere shareholder who traded illegally based on insider information.
Parent
Re:Are there ANY big box companies with good servi (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Not my experience at all (Score:3, Funny)
OF course, I:
- figure out everything I can and have the info at my fingertips when I call
- always treat the person on the other end of the phone with courtesy and respect, even when the only verb tense they know is present participle
- don't expect miracles from entry-level tech support
- have been with them for years and they value me as a customer