Slashdot Log In
China's Battle to Police the Web
Posted by
Zonk
on Thu Mar 27, 2008 03:05 PM
from the losing-battle dept.
from the losing-battle dept.
What_the_deuce writes "For the first time in years, internet browsers are able to visit the BBC's website. In turn, the BBC turns a lens on the Chinese web-browsing experience, exploring one of the government's strongest methods of controlling the communication and information accessible to the public. 'China does not block content or web pages in this way. Instead the technology deployed by the Chinese government, called Golden Shield, scans data flowing across its section of the net for banned words or web addresses. There are five gateways which connect China to the internet and the filtering happens as data is passed through those ports. When the filtering system spots a banned term it sends instructions to the source server and destination PC to stop the flow of data.'"
Related Stories
[+]
New "Iron Curtain" for Russian Internet 239 comments
Dionysius, God of Wine and Leaf, points out a story about the Russian government's interest in expanding anti-extremism laws to include the blocking of websites and ISPs. The laws would match those already in use for the country's print media. Russian internet users may soon be forced to deal with the same issues facing Chinese citizens. Quoting:
"An official at the Russian prosecutor's general office, Vyacheslav Sizov, told the Russian-language newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta that any web site that is determined to host what he terms 'extremist material' would be blocked from being accessible from within the Russian Federation. Given the Putin government's history with the media, 'extremist material' may be very broadly interpreted as any content unfriendly to the interests of the Russian government."
[+]
China's All-Seeing Eye 213 comments
Greg Walton brings us a lengthy story from Rolling Stone which describes China's comprehensive surveillance project, dubbed Golden Shield. The 'Great Firewall of China,' which we've discussed in the past, is but one aspect of Golden Shield. It also includes national ID cards, CCTV networks, and face-recognition software. This investigation showcases just how massive an undertaking it truly is. When finished, it will dwarf London's surveillance system. Quoting:
"Over the past two years, some 200,000 surveillance cameras have been installed throughout the city. Many are in public spaces, disguised as lampposts. The closed-circuit TV cameras will soon be connected to a single, nationwide network, an all-seeing system that will be capable of tracking and identifying anyone who comes within its range -- a project driven in part by U.S. technology and investment. Over the next three years, Chinese security executives predict they will install as many as 2 million CCTVs in Shenzhen, which would make it the most watched city in the world. (Security-crazy London boasts only half a million surveillance cameras.) ... This is the most important element of all: linking all these tools together in a massive, searchable database of names, photos, residency information, work history and biometric data. When Golden Shield is finished, there will be a photo in those databases for every person in China: 1.3 billion faces."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
SSL? Freenet? (Score:4, Interesting)
However, if it is only scanning for keywords why aren't people bypassing it with encrypted websites, Freenet, etc?
I think if we were talking to some average Chinese students on the street we would get the real 411 on just how effective this "Golden Shield" really is.
Re:SSL? Freenet? (Score:4, Informative)
I would like to know what else they are using. I might learn a thing or two from it.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Well, that would be my immediate choice. I do it from work sometimes if I don't their filters catching me.
You need a cooperative machine outside the firewall. Then you ssh to it. SSH can act as a SOCKS proxy if you give it the "-D" option and a port number.
Firefox and IE can both be set to browse using the proxy. Firefox even has a setting (in about:config or whatever it is) to do DNS through the proxy as well. Then everything is encrypted and travelling over a tunnel to the friendly box outside.
Extremel
the US does the same thing (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Re:SSL? Freenet? (Score:5, Informative)
The expats I've met in China use Firefox with the Tor extension. It slows things down, so they just normally browse, and then active Tor when they want to go to a banned site.
Parent
Re:SSL? Freenet? (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:SSL? Freenet? (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Imagine keeping a worker in a basement turning a wheel that powers your house. If you use the energy he generates to power a lock on the door, and use a portion of that power to keep him from getting any information on how to quit working, the system pays fo
Re:SSL? Freenet? (Score:4, Interesting)
A Chinese colleague of mine explained a simpler way that some Chinese have used to get past the censors. For instance, the character fa [mdbg.net] of "Falun Gong" gets split into two characters. The left part (the three dots) represents water, so shui [mdbg.net] is used instead. Without the three dots, fa becomes qu [mdbg.net]. So rather than write Falun Gong, a message board poster might write Shui-qu-lun Gong. This could be figured out by a person reading it, but wouldn't be found by computer search.
This was a while ago, and I assume that such a simple substitution would get figured out pretty quickly, but I thought it was neat.
Parent
Re:SSL? Freenet? (Score:4, Interesting)
The "golden shield," like Beijing's attempt to control anything that goes on in China is completely ineffective. Westerners (who believe society is synonymous with government and law) look at China's authoritarian policies and believe that all Chinese people live under repression.
That simply isn't the case. When Chinese people completely ignore international copyright law they aren't being selective; that's their attitude toward all laws. As the saying goes: heaven is high, and the emperor is far away. If authority can't see you or get to you, then it may as well not exist.
If the government decides to go after you you can consider yourself proper fucked, but they only do that very rarely, and it's always against individuals or groups that really irritate them. If you keep your head low and don't do anything to inconvenience or embarrass the government they don't care what you do. 99.99% of people have never had to deal with the police, ever. Not even parking tickets. Even fewer have any kind of criminal record.
That's how it is with internet censorship. The golden shield leaks like a sieve and everyone knows it. Since it's keyword activated you can get away with saying anything you want about the government so long as you abbreviate zhongguo zhengfu (Chinese government) to zgzf, and so on. The system is really only there as a passive (sometimes active) reminder from Beijing that a Chinese government really does exist and they really are in charge, goddammit.
Parent
bbc copied article? (Score:2, Interesting)
Censorship (Score:3, Insightful)
(I'm just tired of people complaining about this place becoming a police state)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Censorship (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
One form is not allowing people access to content by blocking it. That's what China does.
Another way to censor is to fine people who display unwanted content. The US uses this to keep "bad language", images of a sexual nature, etc. off of non-premium television stations.
Another form of censorship involves controlling the media. The current administration does this primarily by blacklisting reporters who don't play nicely. A
Re:Censorship (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.cnn.com/ [cnn.com]
http://edition.cnn.com/ [cnn.com]
But who would think to put "edition" at the beginning of a URL?
Parent
Too bad (Score:4, Insightful)
Some things may not be *as bad* in America as they are in China, but they can still be *bad*.
In fact, we are seeing a slow but stead erosion of various civil liberties.
Yes, things could be worse, but that is no reason to avoid making them better now.
Parent
Can get out with VPN (Score:2, Informative)
Freedom! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Way to go BBC (Score:2)
How to frustrate the censors: a simple proposal (Score:5, Interesting)
Now the censors are rapidly going to discover that the firewall isn't working, because suddenly it's blocking all the stuff they want their people to be able to get to!
Re:How to frustrate the censors: a simple proposal (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Remind me again, why does China have MFN status? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Remind me again, why does China have MFN status (Score:2)
Re:Remind me again, why does China have MFN status (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Remind me again, why does China have MFN status (Score:5, Insightful)
Because they hold over $1.4 trillion dollars in US debt? Because they could crush our economy by unloading that paper [telegraph.co.uk] and their dollar reserves on the open market? Because the US is still going to China to beg for handouts because we can't balance our budget? Because their population of men available for military service exceeds that of the entire United States? And possibly, because our leadership, world famous as staunch defenders of civil rights themselves, really doesn't give a shit about Chinese human rights abuses?
But what do I know? I'm just guessing here...
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Sorry but Europe took over as their largest market a while ago. M.A.D doesn't work in this scenario (I'd argue that it doesn't work at all) as china is more than able to lose over 50% of its luxury economy (the goods they export, China is a primary producer just not an exporting primary producer) and
Re:Remind me again, why does China have MFN status (Score:4, Interesting)
Can you guess which team is doing the Nazi salute? It's the England team.
Parent
Re:More than just corporations selling us out, als (Score:3, Interesting)
Producing your own quality products in the US with US workers(or even a worker-friendly country) are 2 cardinal sins according to them.
Well...duh. The US has much stricter environmental laws than China, so any industrial plants are going to have problems over here. They're going to be more expensive, if they're even feasible, meaning the costs of producing the goods goes up, and the prices that they must sell for in order to make a profit also go up. That computer you're typing on? You probably couldn't afford it if all of the parts had been made in the USA.
Then there's the workers. In China, a person working in a factory for a full
Comcast??? (Score:5, Funny)
Comcast has service in China???
Borrowed Time (Score:4, Interesting)
More than ever, information is becoming the lifeblood of a people. Without access to the full volume of information freely available to the rest of the world, China will fall behind in crucial ways. The filtering solution won't block out everything important, but it will block out some. Maybe someone mentions Tibet in his chemistry thesis and it's filtered for China, or whatever. There's a piece of information the rest of the world gets for free that a researcher in China might well miss.
Ultimately I think China will decide it's in its best interest to allow the free flow of information into the country, and that in turn will help drive their country ever more towards modern democracy.
Of course, I could be completely wrong. Maybe the future will end up like Red Dawn.
Let's speed up this process (Score:2, Redundant)
only 5 gateways? (Score:2)
"Great Firewall of China" (Score:4, Insightful)
Absolutely pathetic come to think about it.
Re:"Great Firewall of China" (Score:4, Insightful)
It's a bit like when you are at work and you see some headline about the recent security problem at Facebook. You see Paris Hilton mentioned, so you stay clear from the link because you are not sure the article will be purely technical and not embarassing.
No need for a 100% efficient filtering system to frighten people and cause them to self-censor.
Parent
Government not entirely to blame (Score:5, Insightful)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7313998.stm [bbc.co.uk]
They don't think that their media is at all biased. They believe "western" media is biased and has an anti-Chinese agenda.
Too much fucking national pride is what it is. When I talk to Chinese people, in China, I often get this weird apologetic "our country is crappy in a socio-economic way", but "our morals and cultural values are superior to your hedonistic, non-family oriented foreign ways".
It's creepy. Take a look at the China-daily forum if you have morbid interest. It's full of the craziest ranting racists I have ever seen...and I visited 4chan once.
Bottom line is, I don't think the government oppressing the people with censorship should be looked at in such a simplistic way. There seems to be a need for the censorship for many people on some level. Like they can't take a single bit of criticism of their precious middle kingdom and it's 5000 (actually 50) year great history.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
From government sponsored schools and press releases.
They are victims of sweet sweet propaganda, so yes, you can blame the government. This is how totalitarianism works. China wants to block the internet to prevent it's people from finding the logical holes in their education.
It's about shame (Score:3, Insightful)
They can't take criticism, because they are suppressing so much shame. It's the natural human condition - when you feel that pain inside of you, you reach for pleasant dreams and feelings of superiority to make it go away. The louder the racist/nationalist, the bigger the mental image they are attached to. People create that mental image for a reason.
Having China stop its own spam... (Score:3, Interesting)
Who wrote the software? Supplied the hardware? (Score:3, Interesting)
Would you be capable of filtering all of China's net access using off the shelf boxes and some custom software, or would it need some specialised network hardware?
Are Cisco for (an obvious) example, supporting this censorship through hardware and/or software?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?lang=e&id=50A38A55EB758C0C80256C72004773CD [amnestyusa.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:encryption? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent